Academic - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

Academic

Leadership

R

et

r

e

at

Augus

t

28

,

2013

1Slide2

Journey to

the

Top 25

2Slide3

Students

§

We are a student-focused

university

§ How

we treat

our students is important§

One Stop

3Slide4

J

une

Board

of Tr

ustees

4

§ 6% Tuition Increase

§ 5% Raise Pool – 3

rd

year in a row

§

Fee Increases

§

Transfer streets to universitySlide5

Governor’s Review

of

Higher Education

§

Access

§

Quality§ Preparing students for

careers

5Slide6

Branding &

Communications

6Slide7

Branding &

Communications

§

Branding contributes to success

§

Consistency is

essential§ Good

stories reinforce the brand and everyone benefits§

Buy-in is

critical

7Slide8

§

We are strategic

communicators

Branding provides framework

Work with

campus

partnersUse data

to make decisionsBranding is a continual

process

Branding &

Communications

8Slide9

Branding &

CommunicationsSlide10

Development

$92,402,645

raised

32,54

0 donors

10Slide11

Development

Priorities

Support

the

Journey to the Top 25

11§ Chairs, professorships,

and faculty awa

rds

§ Scholarships

and Fellowships

§

College Priorities§ Deans, Department

Heads vital to

fundraisingSlide12

Athletics

§

Not

most important, but

most visible

§

Clean, successful program is critical

§ Most top public universities

succeed in both

§

Working toward

better financial model

12Slide13

Athletics

13

§

Suspended

$6 million/year of support

-- no impact on current commitments

§ Athletics funds

facilities & utilities – budget

reserve inadequate

§

80% of

student

athletes pay

out-of-state tuition§ UTM and UTC

each invest

~$5 million annually§

38 of Top 50

publics transfer money to athleticsVirginia$13.1 million

Georgia Tech

$18 millionRutgers$27 millionTexas A&M$5.2 millionAlabama$4.5 millionSlide14

Athletics

§

Academic

success

Record performance

– student

athletes 3.05+ GPA

58% of student athletes 3.0 GPA or higher

115 student

athletes on Dean’s List

Herman Lathers

– Chancellor’s Citation

for Extraordinary Community Service

14Slide15

New

Tuition Model

15

§

Take 15, graduate

in 4

§ Applies to new

undergraduates in Fall 2013§ Full-time

students

pay for 15 hours

§

No additional

cost

for 15+ hours§ Expectation – limit

tuition

increases to 3% annually for three

years for Class

of 2017Slide16

Average

Net

Price of Tuition

$

(

5,619.00)

16

$2,945.00

$3,700.00

$3,752.00

$(8

,

000.00)

$(6

,

000.00)

$(4

,

000.00)

$(2,000.00)$-­‐$2,000.00$4,000.00$6,000.00BoIom QuarKle ($0 -­‐ $46,515)Second QuarKle ($46,516 -­‐$95,444)Third QuarKle ($95,445 -­‐$151,369)Fourth QuarKle ($151,370 -­‐$1,506,000)Slide17

In-State

Tuition at

Four-Year Schools

FY

2012-2013A comparison

of undergraduate in-­‐state

maintenance and mandatory

fees between four-­‐ year higher educaKon insKtuKons in Tennessee.

InsKtuKon

Mandatory

U

G Maint

.Fees Fees*Total

$ from

UTK

InsKtuKon

TBR

schools based on 15 credit hours each semesterSource – Tennessee Higher EducaKon Commission17Mandatory FeesMiddle Tennessee1,594UT

ChaIanooga

1,490UT Knoxville1

,290University of Memphis1,256AusKn Peay1,

224Tennessee Tech1,200UT MarKn

1

,

103

East

Tennessee

1

,

075

Tennessee State

930

Sorted

by Mandatory

Fees

Sorted

by Total

Fees

*Higher

than UT Knoxville

U

T

K

nox

v

ille

1

,

290

7

,

802

9

,

092

University of

Memphis

1

,

256

6

,

978

8

,

234

858

Middle

Tennessee

*

1,594

5

,

898

7

,

492

1

,

600

UT ChaIanooga

*

1,490

5

,

722

7

,

212

1

,

880

UT MarKn

1

,

103

5

,

978

7

,

081

2

,

011

East

Tennessee

1

,

075

5

,

922

6

,

997

2

,

095

T

e

nn

e

ss

e

e T

e

ch

1

,

200

5

,

748

6

,

948

2

,

144

A

usKn

Peay

1

,

224

5

,

694

6

,

918

2

,

174

Tennessee State

930

5

,

772

6

,

702

2

,

390Slide18

Student

Debt

Ave

rage U

T student d

ebt (2012-13):

UT students with NO debt: Av

erage expenses:

Less than $21,000

5

1%

Less

than $26,000/year

Most scholarships expire:4 ye

ars

18Slide19

We Remain a Great

Value

§

Great value

§

Future of tuition increases

§ Financial burden on our students§

Net tuition

is

low

19Slide20

20

Journey to

the

To

p

25Slide21

UTK

Position

Metr

i

cs

UTK

June 20

1

0

UTK

June 2013

UTK

Change 2010-201

3

ACT Equivalent29/24

29/24

No changeRetention Rate84%

85%

+1 pt6-Year Graduation Rate60%66%+6 ptPh.D. Degrees277319+42Master’s and Professional Degrees1,845

18

35- 10Federal Research

Expenditures$70 M$127 M+$57 M

Total Research Expenditures$165 M$230 M

+$65 M

Tenure-

L

ine

Salary Range

$6

6

t

o

$10

7 K

$

73

t

o

$12

1 K

+$7

to

$14 K

Undergraduate

Student/Tenure-

L

ine Faculty

20

Waiting on

data

Faculty

Awards

10

Waiting on

data

Teaching

and Support

Expenditures/ Student

$16,100

$1

7

,9

75

+ $1,875

Endowment/

Student

$14,380

$15,803

+ $1,4

2

3Slide22

Progr

ess

22

§

1 st

ayed same – Met

our goal§

8 Metrics improved§ 1 de

creased

§

2

Metrics TBDSlide23

72

74

76

78

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

Freshman Retention

Rate

1

st

to

2

n

d

Year

Retention Rate; 2002-2011 Fres

h

men Co

h

ort

Years

23

77.8%

78%

79.6%

81.7%

84.0%

83.6%

83.8%

86.2%

84.5%

84.6%

80

82

84

86

88Slide24

Freshman Retention

Rate

§

Even great

players have a coach

§ W

e want all of our students to succeed and complete

their degrees

24Slide25

Graduation

Rates

Four,

Five and Six

Year Graduation

RatesFall

Cohorts 1999 - 2008

FOUR-­‐YEAR

FIVE-­‐YEAR

SIX-­‐YEAR

Preliminary

28

.

7%

30

.

6%

29

.

4%

30

.

0%

31

.

2%

30

.

6%

33

.

7%

35

.

7%

36

.

7%

39

.

0%

40

.

0%

23

.

4%

24

.

2%

23

.

7%

24

.

7%

24

.

3%

25

.

2%

24

.

8%

25

.

8%

25

.

3%

5

.

1%

5

.

3%

4

.

7%

5

.

1%

5

.

1%

4

.

7%

4

.

7%

4

.

6%

6

.

0%

10%

0%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

1999

2000

2001

2002

200

3

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Fall

Cohort

Years

57

.

2%

63

.

2%

66

.

1%

68

.

0%

60

.

6%

60

.

5%

57

.

8%

59

.

8%

60

.

1%

25Slide26

Graduates

2011-2012

Academic Year

4539

3911

2724

1673

2146

1696

1514

1312

959

1116

729

39

2205

954

1370

2047

826

462

556

320

540

132

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

Bachelor's

Graduate/Professional

6,744

4,865

4,094

3,720

3,001

2,158

2,070

1,499

1,880

1,248

768

26Slide27

Graduate

Degrees

1845

1807

1726

1835

277

258

270

319

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2010

2011

2012

2013

P

hD

Masters and Professional

27Slide28

Research

Me

trics

28

AREAS OF FOCUS

INDICATORS

2010

BASELINE2013

ASSESSMENT

THREE-­‐YEAR PROGRESS

CHANGE IN GAP

TO

TOP 25 TARGET

2010 VS. 2013RESEARCH

FEDERAL

RESEARCH EXPENDITURES

$70 M

$127 M+57 MFAVORABLETOTAL

RESEARCH EXPENDITURES

$165 M$230 M+65MFAVORABLESlide29

Research/Scholarship

§

Governor’s Chairs

§

National Academy

of Science

§ National Academy

of Engineering§ Brede

sen Center

§ Center

for the

Humanities

§ Ande

rson Centerfor Entrepreneurship

29Slide30

Faculty

and Staff

Metric

s

30

AREAS OF FOCUS

INDICATORS

2010BASELINE

2013ASSESSMENT

THREE-­‐ YEAR PROGRESS

CHANGE IN GAP

TO

TOP 25 TARGET2010 VS. 2012

FACULTY

AVG. TENURE-­‐LI

NE SALARY

RANGE$66 to$107K$73 to$121K+$7 to$14K

Favo

rableUNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS/TENURE-­‐ LINE FACULTY20WaiKng on dataSlide31

Faculty

$73

$90

$85

$80

$75

$70

$65

$60

$55

$50

$95

Average Assistant

Professor

Salary; Fall

2012

$100

31

AspiraKon

Target

PeerSlide32

Faculty

Average Associate Professor

Salary, Fall

2012

$120

$86

$90

$80

$70

$60

$50

$100

$110

AspiraKon

Target

Peer

UTK

u

p 1

posi

t

ion

sin

ce 20

11

32Slide33

Faculty

Average Full

Professor

Salary, Fall

2012

$190

$121

$130

$110

$90

$70

$50

$150

$170

AspiraKon

Target

Peer

UTK

u

p 1

posi

t

io

n

sin

ce 20

1

1

33Slide34

Faculty

and Staff

§

Raises since

2011 – 16% compounded (5%

per year)

§ $52M in salaries since

2011§ Permanent

funding stays within

college

34Slide35

Faculty

and Staff

Accompli

shments

§

Endowed 37

chairs, professorships, and faculty awards

§ Implemented career paths for lecturers

§ Completed

a benchmarking compensation study

§

Performance-based merit

pay

35Slide36

To

p 2

5 Inf

rastr

uctur

e Prog

ressProjects

underway üStudent Union üStrong Hall ü

Residence Hall ü

Landsca

pe Master

Plan

Re

cently completed

ü Natalie

Haslam Music Centerü

John D. Tickle Engineering Building

ü Humanities and Social Sciencesü Greve Hallü Brehm Animal Science

and Food Science

Buildings36Slide37

To

p 2

5 Inve

stm

ents

§

$10.4M invested in the past

3 yearsStrategic Instructional Fund

Research

Relieve

bottleneck courses

Faculty

Hires

Development and Alumni

Advising

First Year and Transition Programs

–

Vice Chancellor for Diversity37Slide38

38

Looking ForwardSlide39

Civility/Diversity/Citizenship

§

Core v

alue§

Eve

ryone’s responsibility§

Critical to achieving excellence

§ Vice

Chancellor

for Diversity

30Slide40

Internationalization

4

0Slide41

Productive

Partnerships

41Slide42

§

   $6.9M formula phase-in

§  

$7.4M appropriation improvements

§  

$3.0M College of Engineering

§   $1.2M fringe benefit funding

§   $2.6M 1.5% salary

increase (55%)

$21.1M proposed funding

§

   $24M steam plant

§  

$6M deferred maintenance§   $20 million ($5m/year x 4 years) fora successful NSF Super Computer Proposal

FY

2013-14 Budget

42Slide43

Fixed

costs,

key iniKaKves,

and strategic investments

FY

2013-­‐14 Budget

In

millions

43

Salary

plan

$11

.9

College of Engineering$

3.0

Systems charge increase/ recalibraKon$ 1.9Hires / promoKons / ladders$ 1.1Faculty startup commitments$ 0.8Contract escalaKons & new building costs$ 1.4Scholarship commitments

$ 4.7

Top 25/academic reinvestments$ 4.3

Benefits + Grad Health Insurance$ 1.6Waivers / Summer / DE / Shares

$ 6.0FY 2012-13 Proposed Uses of RevenuesSlide44

Finances

44

§

Why are budgets

tight?

– Tuition increases

also cost us more money

– Raises $52M–

Construction/Renovation–

Strategic

Top 25 investments

– Missed

UG enrollment

projection last year– Graduate

Fellowships ($12M)Slide45

Plan Going

Forward

45

§

Tuition primary revenue source

§

15-4 is being implemented

§ UG Enrollment goal=21,5

00, Fall 201

4

§

Creative proposals

to the

stateSlide46

Plan Going

Forward

46

§

How can we

be more confident

in year-to-year

funding?§ Why is athletic funding

model

changing?Slide47

47

Challenges

UT

Flor

i

da

State

ClemsonTexas A&M

UC-

Davis

% of cl

asses <

20

33%34%

52

%19%

33%

% of classes of 50 or more8%16%14%

2

5%25%First-year retention85%91%91%92%92%Total students27,01840,695

20,768

50,22732,354

Number of faculty1,4581.2681,051

2,0341,596Student/Faculty Ratio

19

32

20

25

20Slide48

Challenges

48

§

Board of

Trustees –

What do faculty

do?How much

do they teach?§ What is

the

role of

higher education?

§

How

can the cost of a degree be reduced?

–

Increase productivity? Cut costs?

§

Political challenges…Slide49

Future

49

§

We have set

our vision

§ We have made

significant progress§

But I need your continuing advice, support,

and helpSlide50

50

Questions/ Comments