PPT-Inductive Reasoning, Conditional Statements, & Deductiv
Author : danika-pritchard | Published Date : 2017-09-25
Test 3 Find the next three terms in the sequence 3 5 7 9 7 3 12 20 C GK Find the next three terms in the sequence 3 5 7 9
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Inductive Reasoning, Conditional Stateme..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Inductive Reasoning, Conditional Statements, & Deductiv: Transcript
Test 3 Find the next three terms in the sequence 3 5 7 9 7 3 12 20 C GK Find the next three terms in the sequence 3 5 7 9 . A. rgue . S. uccessfully. Deductive and Inductive Reasoning. Introduction. “Logic has been a formal academic discipline for . almost 2,500 years. For much of western history, logic was one of the main branches of schooling (the classical curriculum consisted of grammar, logic and rhetoric - Language used to persuade or influence others). With the growth of more specialized disciplines and wider curricula in the 20th century, formal logic got lost in the shuffle. In its place, philosophers began formulating courses in what we now call critical thinking, or informal logic.” (FactCheckEd.org, 2008). Argument. Monty Python – Argument Clinic video. Monty Python. Premises + Conclusion = Argument. Argument – a group of statements including one or more premises and a conclusion. Premise – a statement in an argument that provides reason or support for the conclusion. It’s Logical. What is Logic?. Logic. – The science of correct reasoning.. Reasoning. . – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from known or assumed facts. .. There are two main types of reasoning:. The other side of logic. Deduction . vs. Induction. Deduction – General to Specific. Induction – Specific to General. Inductive reasoning. Uses particular facts, common threads and ideas to draw a conclusion suggested by evidence. Lecture Outline. Inductive Reasoning. Generalizations. Cause and Effect. Analogy. Deductive Reasoning. Syllogism. Enthymeme. Inductive Reasoning. Inductive Reasoning: Review. The process of citing a number of specific examples or . Thinking Mathematically. Objectives. Understand mathematical reasoning . Distinguish between inductive and deductive reasoning . Identify . arithmetic and geometric sequences . Thinking Mathematically. Inductive Reasoning . When you use a pattern to find the next term in a sequence you’re using . inductive reasoning.. The conclusion you’ve made about the next terms in the pattern are called a . Mimi . Opkins. CECS 100. Fall 2011. Problem Solving. Logic. – The science of correct reasoning.. Reasoning. – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from known or assumed facts.. When solving a problem, one must understand the question, gather all pertinent facts, analyze the problem i.e. compare with previous problems (note similarities and differences), perhaps use pictures or formulas to solve the problem.. To form conjectures through inductive reasoning. To disprove a conjecture with a counterexample. To avoid fallacies of inductive reasoning. Example 1. You’re at school eating lunch. You ingest some air while eating, which causes you to belch. Afterward, you notice a number of students staring at you with disgust. You burp again, and looks of distaste greet your natural bodily function. You have similar experiences over the course of the next couple of days. Finally, you conclude that belching in public is socially unacceptable. The process that lead you to this conclusion is called. Basic APA Style. Reky Groendal. Resources. APA Manual Sixth Edition. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/10/. http://www.lib.monash.edu.au/tutorials/citing/apa.html. http://flash1r.apa.org/apastyle/basics/index.htm. To form conjectures through inductive reasoning. To disprove a conjecture with a counterexample. To avoid fallacies of inductive reasoning. Example 1. You’re at school eating lunch. You ingest some air while eating, which causes you to belch. Afterward, you notice a number of students staring at you with disgust. You burp again, and looks of distaste greet your natural bodily function. You have similar experiences over the course of the next couple of days. Finally, you conclude that belching in public is socially unacceptable. The process that lead you to this conclusion is called. Examples. If it is lightning, then practice will be cancelled. If it is 3:20, then school is over.. If you have a daughter, then you are a parent. If 2 lines intersect, then they do so at one point. If 2 planes intersect, then they do so at a line.. Reasoning and Proof Geometry Chapter 2 This Slideshow was developed to accompany the textbook Larson Geometry By Larson , R., Boswell, L., Kanold , T. D., & Stiff, L. 2011 Holt McDougal Some examples and diagrams are taken from the textbook. JavaScript Controlling the flow of your programs with ‘if’ statements if (something is true) { Do this stuff here } else { Do this other stuff } Learning Objectives By the end of this lecture, you should be able to:
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Inductive Reasoning, Conditional Statements, & Deductiv"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents