/
PERCEPTION BY HEALTH WORKERS IN THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY PERCEPTION BY HEALTH WORKERS IN THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY

PERCEPTION BY HEALTH WORKERS IN THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY - PowerPoint Presentation

danika-pritchard
danika-pritchard . @danika-pritchard
Follow
391 views
Uploaded On 2017-12-27

PERCEPTION BY HEALTH WORKERS IN THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY - PPT Presentation

HOSPITAL KATH BY DR NANA SERWAA A QUAO OVERCROWDING IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ED DR GEORGE ODURO DR JOE BONNEY DR PAA KOBINA FORSON COAUTHORS INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OBJECTIVE METHOD ID: 618167

patient overcrowding health emergency overcrowding patient emergency health department freq workers 108 care 2015 source field data delays poor

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "PERCEPTION BY HEALTH WORKERS IN THE ACCI..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

PERCEPTION BY HEALTH WORKERS IN THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY CENTRE, KOMFO ANOKYE TEACHING HOSPITAL (KATH)BYDR. NANA SERWAA A. QUAO

OVERCROWDING IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT (ED):Slide2
Slide3

DR. GEORGE ODURO

DR. JOE BONNEY

DR. PAA KOBINA FORSON

CO-AUTHORSSlide4

INTRODUCTIONPURPOSE

OBJECTIVE

METHOD

SAMPLE

RESULTS

DISCUSSIONRECOMMENDATIONCONCLUSIONREFERENCES

OUTLINESlide5

Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is gradually becoming a growing trend in many hospitals worldwide.

According to a 2002 national US survey, more than 90% of large hospitals report EDs operating “at” or “over” capacity.

Overcrowding can be defined as “a situation in which demand for service exceeds the ability to provide care within a reasonable time, causing physicians and nurses to be unable to provide quality care”.

INTRODUCTIONSlide6
Slide7
Slide8
Slide9
Slide10

A number of effects have resulted from ED overcrowding:Inadequate patient care

Prolonged delays in the treatment of pain and suffering

Long waiting times and patient dissatisfaction

Ambulance diversions

Decreased nurse/physician satisfaction

Negative effect on teaching and research

(Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians,

CJEM (2001

)).Slide11

KATH ED receives an average of 84 patients per day and 28,000 patients in a year.

Overcrowding

and long boarding hours has been a challenge in the EDSlide12
Slide13

To assess the perception and causes of patient overcrowding among health personnel and to identify strategies to reduce overcrowding in the emergency department.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDYSlide14

To determine the perception of overcrowding in the emergency department among health personnel

To identify the factors contributing to overcrowding in the emergency department

To ascertain the effects of overcrowding on patient care among health personnel

To identify strategies to reduce patient overcrowding in the emergency department

SPECIFIC OBJECTIVESSlide15

A cross-sectional study was used.

The study was carried out for three months in 2015.

Questionnaire based interviews were conducted among health workers to give their perception about patient overcrowding and its effects.

Analysis was done using

Epi

Info 7 by CDC.METHODSlide16

A total of 513 health workers (47 doctors, 189 nurses, 277 clinicians in internal medicine, surgery, trauma and orthopaedics, EENT combined) work in the Emergency units of yellow, red, orange and CDU under the Emergency Department.

110 ED health care workers were recruited using systematic random sampling.

SAMPLESlide17

A total of 110 health workers were surveyed with 59 (53.64%) being nurses and 51(46.36%) as doctors.

Females were 52(47.27%) and males were 58 (52.73%).

All workers had attained some form of level of education with Diploma as the highest, 41(42.27%).

Majority of the respondents were residents, 21(19.44%), senior nursing officers, 20(18.52%), and house officers, 14912.96%).

RESULTSSlide18

VARIABLE (N)

Frequency

Percent

SEX (N=110)

 

 

MALE

58

52.73%

FEMAE

52

47.27%

AGE (N=96)

 

 

20-29

41

42.71%

30-39

49

51.04%

40-49

5

5.21%

50-59

1

1.04%

OCCUPATION (N=110)

 

 

NURSING

5953.64%MEDICAL DOCTOR5146.36%EDUCATIONAL LEVEL (N=97)  DIPLOMA4142.27%UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE3536.08%TERTIARY1111.34%POST GRADUATE77.22%MGCS22.06%CERTIFICATE11.03%

Source: Field Data, 2015

UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF HEALTH WORKERSSlide19

RESULTS

The average waiting time of a patient at the ED as perceived by the health workers was 30minutes before being seen by a physician.

Health personnel thought that there was not much variation in the days when the ED is overcrowded but agreed afternoon shifts were mostly crowded among all shifts. Slide20

Source: Field Data, 2015Slide21

RESULTSHealth personnel most agreed strongly that

inappropriate referrals 59.63%

and

delays in getting radiological imaging 49.07% were the main causes of overcrowding.Slide22

CAUSES OF OVERCROWDING

Table 4.1.3 CAUSES OF OVERCROWDING

VARIABLE

STRONGLY AGREE

AGREE

INDIFFERENT

DISAGREE

STRONGLY DISAGREE

FREQ

%

FREQ

%

FREQ

%

FREQ

%

FREQ

%

Lack of Hospital beds (106)

30

28.30%

34

32.08%

10

9.43%

16

15.09%

16

15.09%

Inappropriate Referrals (109)

65

59.63%2926.61%54.59%87.34%21.83%Patients who come without referrals (105)4038.10%2523.81%1918.10%1615.24%54.76%Inadequate Personnel/staff(107)

32

29.91%

31

28.97%

14

13.08%

21

19.63%

9

8.41%

Inadequate logistics and tools (108)4440.74%4339.81%76.48%1211.11%21.85%Radiology Delays (108)5349.07%4440.74%65.56%54.63%00.00%Laboratory Delays (106)3734.91%4441.51%109.43%1413.21%10.94%Delays in dispensing drugs (108)1715.74%4137.96%2220.37%2725.00%2725.00%Theatre Delays (107)4037.38%4441.12%1413.08%98.41%00.00%Delays in transporting patients (108)3229.91%3128.97%1413.08%2119.63%98.41%Delays in billing or assessments (108)3027.78%4238.89%1614.81%1917.59%10.93%

Source: Field Data, 2015Slide23

NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF OVERCROWDING ON PATIENT CARE

Table 4.1.4

NEGATIVE EFFECTS

OF OVERCROWNDING ON PATIENT CARE

VARIABLE (N=108)

STRONGLY AGREE

AGREE

INDIFFERENT

DISAGREE

STRONGLY DISAGREE

FREQ

%

FREQ

%

FREQ

%

FREQ

%

FREQ

%

INCREASED DELAY IN CLINICAL ASSESSMENT

52

48.15%

44

40.74%

7

6.48%

5

4.63%

0

0.00%

INCREASED MARGIN OF MEDCAL ERROR3532.41%5147.22%98.33%1312.04%00.00%INCREASED STAFF STRESS7771.30%2926.85%21.85%00.00%00.00%

POOR WORK SATISFACTION62

57.41%

37

34.26%

7

6.48%

2

1.85%

0

0.00%

Source: Field Data, 2015Slide24
Slide25

Majority of the health workers (95%), said that overcrowding in the ED contributed to poor patient outcome.

Ways in which health workers think overcrowding contribute to poor patient outcome include:

staff exhaustion (40.37%),

compromised quality of patient care (36.70%),

standard procedures not followed

(36.70%),

long waiting time of patients before being assessed by a physician

(29.36%) and

poor working conditions

(27.52%).Slide26

VARIABLE

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Long Waiting Time

32

29.36%

Logistics Not Enough

17

15.60%

Poor Health Worker Concentration

30

27.52%

Staff Exhaustion

44

40.37%

Can’t Explain

17

15.60%

Cross Infections

28

25.69%

Preventable Poor Outcome

28

25.69%

Standard Procedure Not Followed

40

36.70%

Quality of Care Compromised

40

36.70%

Don’t know

32.75%EFFECTS OF OVERCROWDING ON POOR PATIENT OUTCOMESource: Field Data, 2015Slide27

RESULTS

Health personnel strongly agreed that

Equipping district hospitals to handle non-emergency cases (77.78%),

Appropriate referral system (75.93%),

Provision of adequate logistics and consumables (57.41%) can help curb the problem of overcrowding.Slide28

Table 4.1.5

STRATEGIES

TO REDUCE PATIENT OVERCROWDING

VARIALE (N=)

STRONGLY AGREE

AGREE

INDIFFERENT

DISAGREE

STRONGLY DISAGREE

FREQ.

%

FREQ.

%

FREQ.

%

FREQ.

%

FREQ.

%

INCREASE NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (106)

28

26.42%

45

42.45%

13

12.26%

14

13.21%

6

5.66%

INCREASE NUMER OF BEDS (106)3129.25%2018.87%1312.26%3129.25%1110.38%INCREASE THEATRE SPACE (108)3229.63%4238.89%1715.74%1412.96%32.78%BUILD MORE EMERGENCY CENTRES (108)

6459.26

31

28.70%

7

6.48%

4

3.70%

2

1.85%

EQUIP DITRICT HOSPITALS TO HANDLE NON EMERGENCY CASES (108)

8477.78%2323.00%00.00%00.00%10.93%APPROPRIATE REFERRAL SYSTEM (108)8275.93%2523.15%00.00%10.93%00.00%BED MANAGER POSITION (107)4844.86%3936.45%1514.02%54.67%00.00%PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LOGISTICS AND CONSUMABLES (108)6257.41%3835.19%43.70%43.70%00.00%Source: Field Data, 2015Slide29

RESULTS

A greater number of the respondents (98%) agreed that information about bed state on the wards should be sent to the ED as a means of reducing overcrowding whiles 2% thought it was not a good idea.

Those who agreed, majority responded that ward bed states should be sent every

six hours

(four times) in a day.Slide30

VARIABLE (N)

 

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

PHONE CALL (48)

 

47

31.97%

TEXT MESSAGE (34)

 

34

18.18%

PHYSICALY GOING UP TO CHECK (34)

 

33

17.64%

MOBILE APP/ SOFTWARE (63)

 

63

33.68%

ALL OPTIONS ABOVE (10)

 

10

5.34%

Best ways identified to send ward bed state information to the

ward

Source: Field Data, 2015Slide31

Mobile Phone Application On An Android PhoneSlide32

VARIABLE (N=43)

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Help Reduce Overcrowding

8

14.04%

Fast Way to Disseminate Bed State

13

22.81%

Software Is Good and Effective

19

33.33%

Will Not Change Situation

3

5.26%

Benefits For Using Mobile Phone Technology

Source: Field Data, 2015Slide33

VARIABLE(N=54)

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

ADVANTAGES

Effective and quick means for checking and transferring patients to the main wards

21

38.89%

Speed up patient recovery

1

1.85%

Easiest way for information Dissemination about updates of bed state

13

24.07%

Easier and convenient

6

11.11%

Reduces work load at emergency Unit

2

3.70%

DIASADVANTAGES

Information is not accurate

7

12.96%

Does not make any difference

2

3.70%

Increase Inefficiency of personnel

2

3.70%

PROS AND CONS OF USING MOBILE PHONE TECHNOLOGY

Source: Field Data, 2015Slide34

The average waiting time to see a physician is 30 minutes in the ED compared to……

KATH-A

& E is the only

tertiary centre serving the Northern zone of the country and therefore the only one providing specialist services in addition to normal OPD services.

The impact of nearby district hospitals on overcrowding in a Tertiary centre

Overuse of equipment and resources in the hospital

Health

workers are usually tired, exhausted and fatigued so much

that there

can be errors leading to increased morbidity and mortality

DISCUSSIONSlide35

There is a need to put in measures to curb overcrowding.

One

way of curbing overcrowding is to enhance patient outflow from the ED.

A

number of hospitals have implemented patient flow improvement strategies that have resulted in reductions in measures of ED crowding.

As a result, numerous organizations—including the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, the Joint Commission, and the Institute of Medicine—have encouraged hospital leaders to adopt patient flow improvements. (Mcghuh

, 2011)

DISCUSSIONSlide36

DISCUSSION

Contacting doctors on phones to review

patient

Bed

managers have been

introducedReal-time monitoring of patient flow via the use of a mobile phone software application.It

involves the integration of information technology to aid the monitoring of bed states and patient transfers (

Theummler

et al, 2005

).Slide37

RECOMMENDATIONS

Internal Emergency Department

Actions and

Processes That Will Improve Access and Flow:Develop a fast track for treating simple

fractures, lacerations

, sore throats, etc.Minimize silos within the department.Expand the practice of observation medicine.Implement triage protocols.

Expand

the size of

the ED

Provide

additional staff during times of increased volume.

Examine

the discharge process and measure

all reasons

for delays in discharge of the

patient.

Establish

hospital-wide protocols for

addressing capacity

issues in the emergency

department and

implement an alert system when

the hospital

is over capacity

. ACEP 2007Slide38

RECOMMENDATIONS

Expansion and equipping of existing health facilities to manage non emergency cases/ OPD

to reduce

the number of patients waiting in tertiary centres.

Increase

access to immediate diagnostic testing (e.g., ultrasonography, CT scans, MRI) and laboratory investigations to improve patient flow.Slide39

CONCLUSIONOvercrowding

in the ED is perceived to cause staff burn-out and result in poor patient outcomes. Evidence-based interventions may improve

overcrowding. Slide40

Cowan, R.M. & Trzeciak, S., 2005. Clinical review: Emergency department overcrowding and the potential impact on the critically ill.

Critical care (London, England)

, 9(3), pp.291–5. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15987383 [Accessed August 10, 2016

].Joint

Position Statement on emergency department overcrowding. CJEM [Internet]. 2001 Apr 21 [cited 2016 Aug 12];3(2):82–4. Available from:

http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1481803500005285Forson PK (2011). An audit of emergency care at the Accident and Emergency Unit of KATH, Kumasi, Ghana. Masters Thesis Community Health Department, KNUST, Kumasi. (Unpublished)

Mchugh

, M. & Dyke, K.V., 2011. and Reducing Emergency Department Crowding : A Guide for Hospitals Improving Patient Flow Department Crowding : improving Patient Flow and Reducing Emergency Department Crowding, p.8.

REFERENCESSlide41