/
Provisional data on coverage for the following immunisation Provisional data on coverage for the following immunisation

Provisional data on coverage for the following immunisation - PowerPoint Presentation

danika-pritchard
danika-pritchard . @danika-pritchard
Follow
396 views
Uploaded On 2016-11-04

Provisional data on coverage for the following immunisation - PPT Presentation

12 months DTaPIPVHib 24 months MMR dose 1 5 years MMR dose 2 Provisional data not for release outside the NHSPublic Health Department Childhood immunisation coverage q2 201415 Camden had 92 coverage in 12month olds which was significantly higher than London 90 although ID: 484332

children coverage camden target coverage children target camden analysis practices locality north data months medical needed centre note south

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Provisional data on coverage for the fol..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Provisional data on coverage for the following immunisations: 12 months: DTaP/IPV/Hib24 months: MMR dose 15 years: MMR dose 2 Provisional data, not for release outside the NHS/Public Health Department

Childhood immunisation coverage

q2 2014/15Slide2

Camden had 92% coverage in 12-month olds, which was significantly higher than London (90%), although still short of the WHO 95% target.14th out of 31 London boroughs.Context – Camden vs London boroughs, 12 months

2

Note

: Enfield is not included in this

analysis as data is not available. City of London is also

excluded, due to small numbers of eligible children. Source: PHE, 2015Slide3

Camden had 85% coverage in 24-month olds, which was significantly lower than the national average (92%). Context – Camden vs London boroughs, 24 months

3

Note

: Enfield is not included in this

analysis as data is not available. City of London is also excluded, due to small numbers

of eligible children. Source: PHE, 2015Slide4

Camden had 82% coverage in five-year olds, which was significantly lower than the national average (89%). Context – Camden vs London boroughs, 5 year

4

Note

: Enfield is not included in this

analysis as data is not available. City of London is also excluded, due to small numbers

of eligible children. Source: PHE, 2015Slide5

Coverage in one-year old children ranged from 83% to 100% among GP practices in North locality. Only one GP practice in North locality had significantly lower coverage than the WHO target (95%). DTaP/IPV/Hib coverage in children aged 12

months

5

Note

:

Red bars indicate a coverage lower than the WHO target and blue bars indicate a coverage no different to the WHO target. Bedford Square Medical Centre and Plender Street in South Camden are now closed and are not included in this analysis. Source

: PHE, 2015Slide6

In total there were 9 children aged 12 months needed to be immunised to meet the 95% target in Q2 2014/15 in North locality. The five practices below the 95% target were between 1 and 3 children away from meeting it.How many children aged 12 months needed to be immunised to meet 95% WHO target?

6

Note

:

Bedford

Square Medical Centre and Plender Street in South Camden are now closed and are not included in this analysis. Source: PHE, 2015Slide7

MMR coverage among two-year old children ranged from 46% to 100% among GP practices in North locality. A half of the GP practices in North locality had significantly lower coverage than the WHO target (95%). MMR coverage in children aged 24 months

7

Note

:

Red

bars indicate a coverage lower than the WHO target and blue bars indicate a coverage no different to the WHO target. St Philips Medical Centre in South Camden has not submitted the data and is not included in this analysis. Bedford Square Medical Centre and

Plender

Street in South Camden are now closed and are excluded from this analysis.

Source

: PHE, 2015Slide8

In total there were 37 children aged 24 months needed to be immunised to meet the 95% target in Q2 2014/15 in North locality. The nine practices below the 95% target were between 1 and 12 children away from meeting it.

How many children aged

24

months needed to be

immunised to meet WHO target?

8Note: St Philips Medical Centre in South Camden has not submitted the data and is not included in this analysis. Bedford Square Medical Centre and Plender Street in South Camden are now closed and are excluded from this analysis. Source: PHE, 2015Slide9

MMR2 coverage among five-year old children ranged from 67% to 100% among GP practices in North locality. A half of the GP practices in North locality had significantly lower coverage than the WHO target (95%).

MMR 2 coverage

in children aged 5

years

9

Note: Red bars indicate a coverage lower than the WHO target and blue bars indicate a coverage no different to the WHO target. St Philips Medical Centre in South Camden has not submitted the data and is not included in this

analysis.

Bedford Square Medical Centre and

Plender

Street in South Camden are now closed and are excluded from this analysis

.

Source

: PHE, 2015Slide10

In total there were 43 children aged 5 years needed to be immunised to meet the 95% target in Q2 2014/15 in North locality. The nine practices below the 95% target were between 1 and 10 children away from meeting it.

How many children aged

5 years needed

to be

immunised to meet WHO target?

10Note: St Philips Medical Centre in South Camden has not submitted the data and is not included in this analysis. Bedford Square Medical Centre and Plender Street in South Camden are now closed and are excluded from this analysis. Source: PHE, 2015Slide11

How many children needed to be immunised? Q4 2013/14 to Q2 2014/15 combined, North locality11

Note

: The percentages are the additional number of children needed to immunised to bring coverage up to the 95% target split by whether the practices missed the target continuously or not, as proportion to the additional number of whole children needed. Slide12

12Camden has low coverage in childhood immunisations compared to London and England, particularly for vaccinations in older children (two and five year olds).There is considerable variation in immunisation uptake between GP practices within Camden, particularly in

older children.

In

Q2

2014/15

4 GP practices in North locality achieved 95% coverage for MMR2 in 5 year olds. However, 7 practices were significantly below the WHO target and all of those were also significantly below target in the previous quarter.Further work is needed to improve uptake of immunisations to reach WHO recommended coverage levels (95%).The findings from the previous quarters suggest everyone can do more, and only a small additional number of children vaccinated would result in a noticeable rise in coverage. Focus needs to be on improving the accessibility and reach of the immunisation programme, as well as to improve data recording, reporting

and monitoring.

Key messagesSlide13

Thank you For any questions about the childhood immunisation coverage data, please contact us at: marta.Calonge-Contreras@islington.gov.uk

minkyoung.choi@islington.gov.uk

13