PPT-Rebuttal

Author : danika-pritchard | Published Date : 2017-06-05

II Training 23112011 Warwick Debating Society Proudly sponsored by Things to note 1 You can show why different areas of the other sides argument is wrong the explanation

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Rebuttal" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Rebuttal: Transcript


II Training 23112011 Warwick Debating Society Proudly sponsored by Things to note 1 You can show why different areas of the other sides argument is wrong the explanation can be wrong ie the arguments justification does not make sense the example can be wrong ie it is either irrelevant or invalid or the link can be wrong it is irrelevant to the debate. Tetzel, Johann, 1460–1519Johann Tetzel’s rebuttal against Luther’s sermon on indulgences and grace / Translation and introduction by Dewey Weiss Kramer.32 p. cm.1. Luther, Martin, 1483& Most of the comments were positive, which were appreciated.. Of the negative comments, while we agree with most, the ones we don’t agree with was our shortened introduction. We believe that our topic was a continuation of the solar cell discussion Dr. Seminario gave on the first day of class, and therefore a long introduction was not needed.. named the souper of the lorde. Souper of the Lorde published in the spring of that Amwere.' My procedure, therefore, polemical devices which tude towards opponent, then Soup as inepq5 a by Thomas Jefferson. Common Core Standard. Literature. Common. Core. Date Taught. Date Tested. “The Declaration of Independence” by Thomas Jefferson. RL 5. L3a. 9/23/2014. 10/2/14 Even. 10/3/14 Odd. Eiji Hayashi. Human-Computer Interaction Institute. Carnegie Mellon University. Presented @ WISS 2012 Night Session. Dec. 6. th. , 2012. CC BY-NC-SA © 2012 Eiji Hayashi. Some rights reserved. . Additional Note. “I’m all about that rebuttal.”. English 1020. Breaux. Why?. Sometimes, people think that including counterarguments weakens their own argument, but that is not the case.. It’s expected in academic argument/scholarly writing, and it’s an important part of everyday disagreement, as well.. Spring ‘15. Essential Question. What elements of an argument make it different from other types of writing?. Learning Targets. I can identify the argument and specific claims.. Parts of an Argument. Rubuttal. Rebut a definition. Rebut a proposal. Rebut a cause / consequence. Rebut an evaluation . What 4 Things Should a Rebuttal Do?. Summarize. Find Common Ground (concede points). Expose bad reasoning (analogy). Years 8-10. Administration. Administration . Questions-Email Tony Scarcella. . admin@qdu.org.au. If it’s urgent, call him on 0422 022 237. Debating Questions-Email . James Rigby . adjudicators.vp. Overview. Lincoln-Douglas Debate is . a  . VALUE. debate, meaning it is a debate about what . ought to be . rather than specific policy.  . It is usually a topic regarding the conflict . of rights or moral obligations. We want this!. We don’t want this!. Structured discussion and contest. Used in democratic societies to explore and resolve problems:. Board meetings. . Public hearings. . Legislative assemblies. and Rebuttal. Purpose of an Opposing Claim. The purpose of an opposing/counter claim is to show the reader you have considered all sides of the question or issue. An opposing claim and rebuttal strengthen your essay by showing that you have looked at all sides and made an educated choice.. COUNTERCLAIM = THE OTHER SIDE’S ARGUMENT. WHY REBUTTAL. IN AN ARGUMENT, READERS TAKE SIDES. MOST READERS IMMEDIATELY PICK A SIDE. SOME ARE “ON THE FENCE”. REBUTTALS TRY AND PUSH THE READERS ON OFF THE FENCE ONTO YOUR SIDE. House That Jack Built. Concession/Rebuttal. House that Jack built. (Causal Chain). Causal Chain. This elaboration strategy is referred to both as. “House that Jack Built” . AND a . “Causal Chain”..

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Rebuttal"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents