S 10A of the Children and Young Persons care and Protection Act S462B of the Adoption Act The new hierarchy in the care act S10A Permanent Placement principles 1 In this act Permanent placement ID: 159659
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Adoption" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Adoption
S 10A of the Children and Young Persons (care and Protection) Act
S46(2)(B) of the Adoption ActSlide2
The new hierarchy in the care act
S10A Permanent Placement principles
(1) In this act
Permanent placement
means a long-term placement following the removal of a child or young person from the care of a parent or parents pursuant to this Act that provides a safe, nurturing, stable and secure environment for the child or young personSlide3
S10A (2)
(2) Subject to the objects in section 8 and the principles in section 9, a child or young person who needs permanent placement is to be placed in accordance with the permanent placement principles.Slide4
S8 and S9 Amendments
S8(a1) recognition that the primary means of providing for the safety, welfare and well-being of children and YP is by providing them with long term, safe, nurturing, stable and secure environments through permanent placement in accordance with the permanent placement principles.
S9(g) If a child .. is placed in out-of-home care, the permanent placement principles are to guide all actions and decisions made under this Act (whether by legal or administrative processes) regarding the permanent placement of the child or young person.Slide5
s10A(3)(a)
The permanent placement principles are as follows:
(a) If it is practicable and in the best interests of the child, the first preference for permanent placement of the child is for the child to be
restored to the care of his or her parent
or parents so as to preserve the family relationship;Slide6
S10A(3)(b)
If it is not practicable for the child to be placed in accordance with paragraph (a), the second preference for permanent placement of the child is
guardianship of a relative, kin or other suitable person.Slide7
S10A(3)(c)
If it is not practical or in the best interest of the child to be placed in accordance with paragraph (a) or (b), the next preference (except in the case of ATSI child) for the child is to be
adopted
.Slide8
S10A(3)(d)
If it is not practicable or in the best interests of the child to be placed in accordance with paragraph (a), (b) or (c) the last preference is for the child to be placed under the
parental responsibility of the Minister
under this or any other law. Slide9
S10A(3)(e)
If it is not practicable or in the best interests of an
ATSI child
to be placed in accordance with paragraph (a), (b), or (d), the last preference is for the child to be
adopted
.Slide10
Permanent Placement Principles
(is it practicable and in the best interests of the child?)Slide11
What does this mean
Permanency placement principles means that in the case of non- ATSI child adoption is preferred over parental responsibility to the MinisterSlide12
What are the implications of the Permanent placement principles on adoptions proceedings?
Not talking about the numbers of potential adoptions.
Not talking about assessment of proposed adoptive parents.
Just talking about the issues the court needs to consider when making an adoption decision and even then, just one discrete issueSlide13
The Adoption Act (2000)
Objects
The best interests of the child both in childhood and in later life, must be the paramount consideration in adoption law and practice (s7(a))
Adoption is a service for the child s(7)(b)
… the act requires decisions in connection with adoption to be made on the basis that the prime consideration is benefit to the child, as distinct from providing a service to people who wish to adopt a child. However, that does not mean that no service is provided to a child by adoption just because his or her needs are already being adequately met –
Brereton J in Adoption of NG [2014] NSWSC 608 at para 14.
To ensure that adoption law and practice assists a child to know and have access to his or her birth family and cultural heritage s(7)(c)
No adult has a right to adopt a child (principles s8(3)).Slide14
S90 of the Adoption act.
S90(1) of the adoption act provides that the Court must not make an adoption Order unless it is satisfied in relation to a range of matters – including best interests, suitability of adoptive parent and other issues.
S90(2) provides that the court may not make an adoption order unless it is satisfied that any adoption plan agreed by the parties is in the best interests of the child and proper in the circumstance. Slide15
S90(3)
The Court may not make an adoption order unless it considers that the making of the order would clearly be preferable in the best interests of the child than any other action that could be taken by law in relation to the care of the child.Slide16
The cases suggest that s90(3) has been historically used by birth parents as an argument against the court making an adoption order.
There is no typical case. The proposition sometimes put by the birth parents is that whilst they are not in a position to seek restoration, it clearly preferable that PR remains vested in the Minister. This is because it is a less intrusive intervention which preserves the status quo of the child but does not extinguish the parent’s capacity to make an application under s90 of the care act – see Adoption of BS (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 2033.Slide17
Impact of s10A
s10A (3)(c) suggests that the parliament has clearly determined that it is consistent with the best interests of a child for an adoption of a non-aboriginal child to be a preferred option to that of parental responsibility to the Minister.
It is suggested that the Court in making a determination under s90(3) will be obliged to consider the new hierarchy and that this may close down arguments about whether PR to the Minister is preferable to an adoption. It does not prevent arguments being made about Guardianship or PR to the PAP.Slide18
Will adoptions be easier?
The hierarchy will probably make very little difference to outcomes in adoption cases.
Where the argument has been run that PR is preferable to adoption it has generally been unsuccessful
Recalling the adoption is a service to the child the court has typically focused its consideration on the manifest benefit to the child in being provided with certainty whilst ensuring ongoing identification with the birth parents. Slide19
Adoption is also superior to all alternatives in respect of the provision of a sense of security and stability to the child, because it would provide what Ms Hogan described as “felt security” , and resolve any outstanding concerns that the child might not be a permanent member of the family. In doing that, it would also provide a sound and secure basis for the child to explore and develop his relationship with his birth parents.
Brereton J in BS (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 2033 at 79Slide20
In thinking about the impact of the new hierarchy on adoption practice I think the real question is :
Is there a realistic possibility of restoration of the child to the birth parents
If yes – make an application to rescind or vary the order
If no then - is the uncertainty of potential s90 application consistent with the best interests of the child?
Other arguments can be made in adoption proceedings – re: suitability of cares, compliance with the legislation and consent issues.Slide21
Adoption plans
Adoption plans are like care plans and can make provision for contact with the birth parent, religion, exchange of information, change of name, etc.
Birth parents can participate in Adoption plans and in some case mediations are held between the birth parents, the PAP and the DG or delegate regarding the content of the plan.Slide22
An adoption plan can be registered and if it is registered then a party to the plan can seek a review.
It used to be the case that a birth parent could only be a party to an adoption plan if they consented to the adoption. Slide23
Amendments to the Adoption act
S46(2B) has been amended to provided that
A non-consenting birth parent who agrees to an adoption plan is for the purposes of sections 47, 48,50,51 and 90 to be treated as if the non-consenting birth parent were a party to the adoption of a child.Slide24
Conclusions
No real changes to adoptions decisions will arise from the permanent placement principles
Issues with adoption plans have been resolved providing birth parents with a greater voice in the open adoption of their
child even when they do
not consent to an adoption.