Disproportionate Minority Contact in Connecticut’s Juvenile Justice System - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

Disproportionate Minority Contact in Connecticut’s Juvenile Justice System

A presentation to the Commission on Racial & Ethnic Disparity in the Criminal Justice System September 9, 2013Slide2

Guiding Principles

Divert youth from formal system involvement and unnecessary system penetration when consistent with public safetyStructure system decision-making to decrease opportunity for biasServe youth in the community, or in the least restrictive environment required to meet the youth’s supervision and service needsEnsure that youth of color have comparable access to opportunities for diversion as white youth

Use data to inform policy, practice and program developmentSlide3

CSSD

Diverse Governing Body for DMC ReductionSlide4

Goals of Work to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Disparities

Reduce over-representation of youth of color at key decision pointsReduce the disparate treatment of youth of color at key decision pointsPrevent youth of color from unnecessarily entering

and moving through the juvenile justice systemSlide5

Key decision points for DMC reduction in the juvenile justice system

School-based arrests Community-based arrests Secure detentionPlacementsProbation

Parole revocationSlide6

Effective use of data

Examine baseline data at key decision points, disaggregated by:

Race

Ethnicity

Age

Referral Source

Identify points of disparity for deeper analysis

Use data to select sub-populations for targeted reductions

Gender

Geography

Offense

Reason for ReferralsSlide7

The school-to-prison pipeline andreducing school-based arrests

Hartford & Bridgeport school districts had a significant history of arresting youth in schools. A significant percentage of all juvenile arrests were being made at schools. These arrests were primarily of youth of color. Availability of data and review of data has helped identify ways to reduce these school-based arrests

Data reviewed includes: Which schools are arresting kids?What are youth being arrested for? What is the color composition of these arrests? Slide8

What are the leading reasons for referral to juvenile court for delinquency?

Source: CSSD; Hartford based data from January – March 2013.Slide9

What are the Hartford schools with the largest number of referrals to juvenile court from the 2012-13 school year?

Source: CSSD. Data reflect school-based referrals of youth in Hartford Public Schools reported from the beginning of the school year to February 22, 2013.Slide10

Highest Number of School Based Arrests: Bridgeport

2012-2013 School Year

Source: CSSD. Data reflect school-based referrals of youth to the Bridgeport Juvenile Court as of June 12, 2013.Slide11

Results: DMC projects and MOUs between school and police

lead to reduction in school-based arrestsHartford MOU signed in October 2012Bridgeport MOU signed in July 2012Source: CSSDSlide12

Results: School Based Referrals to Hartford Juvenile Court Overall Substantially Reduced

2011-2012 School Year(Sept. –Feb.)

2012-2013 School Year(Sept. –Feb.)

Source:

CSSDSlide13

Results: Reduction in School-Based Referrals to Hartford

Juvenile Court Reduced by Race & Ethnicity

52% reduction from last school year to this school year

At the time this project began, non-magnet Hartford Public Schools generated 113 referrals just from March through the end of the 2010-2011 school year

Source: CSSD. Data reflect school-based referrals of youth in non-magnet Hartford Public Schools.Slide14

In Hartford, youth of color end up in detention more often

Source: CSSD. Slide15

In Hartford, Youth of Color spend a longer number of days in detention

Source: CSSDSlide16

CSSDSlide17

On average, how many days did youth in New Haven, Bridgeport, Hartford spend in detention awaiting placement during 2012?

Source: CSSDSlide18

Results: Reduction in Detention Figures

Source: CSSDSlide19

Youth of color, especially African American youth, spend a longer t

ime waiting in detention for placement

Based on data from 2012 Calendar year.

Source

:

ValueOptions

. Statewide data reflect 121 youth (45 African American, 38 Hispanic, 37 white, 1 Asian).Slide20

Percentage of youth awaiting placement received at least one denial from a program

Source: ValueOptions. Statewide data reflect 121 youth (45 African American, 38 Hispanic, 37white, 1 Asian).Slide21
Slide22

What is the race and ethnicity of youth admitted to detention compared with youth admitted to

Solnit from April through June 2012?

Source

: CSSD. Statewide detention admission data reflect 253 African American youth, 129 Hispanic youth, 137 white youth, and 1 other youth. 21 cases with missing data on race and ethnicity are excluded.

*Source

for youth admitted to Riverview: DCF. Riverview admission data reflect 11 white youth, 6 African American youth, 7 Latino youth, and 4 “Mixed/Other” youth. 72% of youth placed from detention, 14% from home, 7% from hospital, and 7% other.

Average overall wait: 12 days

Wait for male youth: 8 days

Wait for female youth: 16 daysSlide23

Solnit South (Riverview) population by gender & race

2012Source: CSSDSlide24

Arrests in Congregate Care: Top PlacementsApril – June 2013

Source: DCFSlide25

Race & ethnicity of youth being arrested incongregate care: April – June 2013

Placeholder Ines 6

Source: DCFSlide26

What is the average length of stay in days for

girls in JJ facilities (discharges from April 2012 through March 2013) by race and ethnicity?

Source: DCF. No statistical significance found when ethnicity and LOS were comparedSlide27

Results: Arrests in DCF Congregate Care Going Down

Source: DCFSlide28

Results: Parole Revocations going down

Source: DCF