/
Achieving Racial Equity Achieving Racial Equity

Achieving Racial Equity - PowerPoint Presentation

myesha-ticknor
myesha-ticknor . @myesha-ticknor
Follow
447 views
Uploaded On 2017-04-14

Achieving Racial Equity - PPT Presentation

A Multisystems Focus Lyman Legters Casey Family Programs and CYPM Consultant Shay Bilchik Director Center for Juvenile Justice Reform Todays Presenters Lyman Legters Senior Director ID: 537500

juvenile justice child racial justice juvenile racial child welfare youth systems source disparities ryan change foundation 2010 presentation powerpoint disproportionate joseph minority

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Achieving Racial Equity" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Achieving Racial Equity

A Multi-systems FocusLyman LegtersCasey Family Programs and CYPM ConsultantShay BilchikDirector, Center for Juvenile Justice ReformSlide2

Today’s Presenters

Lyman LegtersSenior DirectorCasey Family ProgramsCYPM Consultant

Shay

Bilchik

Director

Center for Juvenile Justice ReformSlide3

Primary Webinar Objectives

Preparing the Environment for the DiscussionIdentifying Racial Equity/Justice as a Cross-systems and CYPM GoalDefining and Framing the IssueEncouraging Multi-systems Efforts to Achieve Racial JusticeFocusing on the Crossover PopulationCollaborating and Sharing ResourcesHearing from CYPM JurisdictionsSlide4

Introduction

CYPM Goals Related to Reducing Racial DisparitiesCYPM Disparity Data – Racial Disparities ExistFocus on Responsibility and SolutionsSlide5

Agreements

Be Okay With DiscomfortListen For Understanding Create Safe SpaceThere Is No Quick FixStay At The TableAdapted from The People's Institute for Survival and BeyondSlide6

Racial Justice

Definition: Racial Justice is the creation and proactive reinforcement of policies, practices, attitudes and actions that produce equitable power, access, opportunities, treatment, impacts and outcomes for all. Indicators: Equitable impacts and outcomes across race is the evidence of racial justice.2009, Adapted from Race Forward, Formerly the Applied Research CenterSlide7

Racial Justice

Racial Justice ≠ Diversity (Variety)Racial Justice ≠ Equality (Sameness)Racial Justice = Equity (Fairness/Justice)09, Adapted from Race Forward, Formerly the Applied Research CenterSlide8

Racial Justice:

Related Values and Key Ideas

Equity / Equitable Outcomes

Inclusion / Accessibility

Equal Opportunity

Dignity / Human Rights

Fairness / Fair Treatment

Shared Power and Resources

2009, Adapted from

Race Forward

, Formerly the

Applied Research CenterSlide9

Racial Justice: Foundation for Change

Focuses on changing systems, institutional practices, policies and outcomesIs pro-active – develops and promotes equitable strategies and solutionsRequires ongoing attention to consciousness and strategic action – cannot be “colorblind” or silent.Slide10

Framing the Issue

Understand levels of racism – focus on institutions and structuresDominant public frames are powerfulPersonal responsibilityPost-racialColorblindEmbrace a “responsibility” frameSlide11

Racial Equity and Systems Integration

Disparities exist in all systemsDisparities in one system impact disparities in other systemsAnalysis and strategies are similarRacial Equity Impact toolsPolicy and practice lensesWorkforce capacity buildingCYPM structure supports cross-systems racial equity workSlide12

Racial Equity

and The Crossover Youth Practice ModelSlide13

Who Are Crossover Youth?

13Slide14

What is the Crossover Youth Practice Model?

The Crossover Youth Practice Model describes the specific practices that need to be in place within a jurisdiction in order to reduce the number of youth who cross over between the child welfare and juvenile justice systems, the number of youth entering and reentering care, and the length of stay in out of home care. The CYPM infuses into its work values and standards, evidence-based practices, policies and procedures, and quality assurance processes. It provides a template for how states can immediately impact how they service crossover youth and rapidly impact outcomes.Slide15

CYPM Values

15Strength-based approaches

Collaborative systemic responses

Fair and equitable treatment

Evidence-basedSlide16

CYPM Goals

Reductions in: the number of youth placed in out-of-home carethe use of congregate carethe disproportionate representation of youth of color, particularly in the crossover populationthe number of youth crossing over and becoming dually-adjudicated16Slide17

What Contributes to Crossing Over

Placement TypePlacement InstabilityLack of School StabilityAbsence of Positive AttachmentsDiminished Positive Youth Development OpportunitiesSlide18

Characteristics of Crossover Youth

African-American Youth OverrepresentedFemale Youth OverrepresentedHigh Rates of Mental Health and Substance Abuse ProblemsTruancyAcademic and Behavioral Problems at SchoolSlide19

Juvenile Justice System Experiences

Reduced Opportunities for DiversionHigh Rates of DetentionDisparities in Use of Out of Home PlacementLack of Permanency PlanningSlide20

Source: Ryan, Joseph. Investigating DMC in Juvenile Justice: The Role of Child Welfare. PowerPoint presentation. 16 March 2010.

Overrepresentation in the Crossover Youth Population

20Slide21

Disproportionality Through a Cross- Systems Lens

Overrepresentation and disproportionality are long standing – and stubborn – issues for both child welfare and juvenile justiceAt national level, African Americans account for approximately 15% of the population, 25% of child protection investigations, 30% of substantiated cases and 36% of placement casesMaltreated children and adolescents are at an increased risk of delinquency

Despite these well established facts, there has been no work focused on understanding and estimating child welfare contribution to DMC in juvenile justice

Research Questions:

(1) Does the child welfare system contribute to DMC in juvenile justice? (2) Are specific types of child welfare placements associated with an increased risk of juvenile justice involvement? (3) Are African American youth disproportionately exposed to such placements in the child welfare system? and (4) Is there a lingering effect for children in the foster care system beyond the point of arrest?

21

Source: Ryan, Joseph (2010).

Child Welfare and Disproportionate Minority Contact in Juvenile Justice.

PowerPoint presentation presented at the MacArthur Foundation

s Models for Change conference on June 24.Slide22

22

Source: Ryan, Joseph (2010).

Child Welfare and Disproportionate Minority Contact in Juvenile Justice.

PowerPoint presentation at the MacArthur Foundation

s Models for Change conference on June 24.Slide23

23

7% of all detention placements have open CW cases

Source: Ryan, Joseph (2010).

Child Welfare and Disproportionate Minority Contact in Juvenile Justice.

PowerPoint presentation at the MacArthur Foundation

s Models for Change conference on June 24.Slide24

24

One might argue that CW is not contributing to DMC if 7% emerged within each column

Source: Ryan, Joseph (2010).

Child Welfare and Disproportionate Minority Contact in Juvenile Justice.

PowerPoint presentation at the MacArthur Foundation

s Models for Change conference on June 24.Slide25

25

Open CW cases account for 7% of all detentions, yet account for 16% of all AA youth entering detention

Source: Ryan, Joseph (2010).

Child Welfare and Disproportionate Minority Contact in Juvenile Justice.

PowerPoint presentation at the MacArthur Foundation

s Models for Change conference on June 24.Slide26

26

CW contributing to DMC in JJ, especially for AA females

Source: Ryan, Joseph (2010).

Child Welfare and Disproportionate Minority Contact in Juvenile Justice.

PowerPoint presentation at the MacArthur Foundation

s Models for Change conference on June 24.Slide27

27

Source: Ryan, Joseph (2010).

Child Welfare and Disproportionate Minority Contact in Juvenile Justice.

PowerPoint presentation at the MacArthur Foundation

s Models for Change conference on June 24.Slide28

28

Source: Ryan, Joseph (2010).

Child Welfare and Disproportionate Minority Contact in Juvenile Justice.

PowerPoint presentation at the MacArthur Foundation

s Models for Change conference on June 24.Slide29

29

Source: Ryan, Joseph (2010).

Child Welfare and Disproportionate Minority Contact in Juvenile Justice.

PowerPoint presentation at the MacArthur Foundation

s Models for Change conference on June 24.Slide30

Summary of Results

Child welfare does contribute to DMC in Juvenile Justice

Consistent across all sites, and at various levels throughout Juvenile Justice System, especially for girls

Estimates would be far greater if we considered children/families previously involved with DCFS (7% vs. 21%)

Child welfare should be included in discussions of DMC and DMC-related efforts

30

Source: Ryan, Joseph (2010).

Child Welfare and Disproportionate Minority Contact in Juvenile Justice.

PowerPoint presentation at the MacArthur Foundation

s Models for Change conference on June 24.Slide31

Further Implications of Ryan’s Research

Disparities in one system may contribute to disproportionality in other systems:EducationMental HealthSlide32

DMC/DMR Workgroup Task

32Slide33

Strategies to Address Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Crossover Population

Source: Racial and Ethnic Disparity and Disproportionality in Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice: A Compendium, Center for Juvenile Justice Reform and Chapin Hall (2009)

Increasing Transparency

Management information systems must be able to collect race and ethnicity information, and they must be able to cross agency boundaries.

Re-engineering Structures and Procedures

Processes and procedures should be reviewed on a routine basis to determine whether they contribute to disparities, and when they do, they should be re-designed.

Mobilizing Political Leadership

Build awareness and consensus among the key decision makers in order to advance needed changes in policy and practice through their ownership of and leadership on the issue.

Changing Organizational Culture

Influence the attitudes and values of agency staff in order to shape organizational culture in a way that may reduce disparate treatment and disproportionality.

Partnering in Developing Family and Community Resources

Work at the community level to build better support systems for families.

33Slide34

Resources

CJJR: Racial and Ethnic Disparity and Disproportionality in Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice: A CompendiumThe Aspen Institute: www.aspeninstitute.orgHaywood Burns Institute (Adoration of the Question, Balancing the Scales of Justice) www.burnsinstitute .orgCenter for the Study of Social Policy: www.cssp.orgRace Forward: www.raceforward.orgGovernment Alliance on Race and Equity: www.racialequityalliance.orgFrameworks Institute:

www.frameworksinsitute.org

The People’s Institute for Survival and Beyond:

www.PISAB.orgSlide35

Dialogue/Q and A

Describe the barriers to eliminating disparities in your jurisdictionsHow can CJJR add support to your efforts to eliminate disparities?What successes are you seeing in your work on racial disparities?Q and A