/
Teachable Unit: Utilization of evidence to construct the tr Teachable Unit: Utilization of evidence to construct the tr

Teachable Unit: Utilization of evidence to construct the tr - PowerPoint Presentation

debby-jeon
debby-jeon . @debby-jeon
Follow
390 views
Uploaded On 2017-05-02

Teachable Unit: Utilization of evidence to construct the tr - PPT Presentation

Group Fabulous 5 Laura Hake Jenny Frederick Carl Hashimoto Kirsten Fertuck Bill Rando Serena Moseman Facilitators Steve Chordas III Justin Hines Teaching Unit Goals and Outcomes ID: 543964

tree evidence life students evidence tree students life morphological traits data related morphology learning trees understand relationship relationships build

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Teachable Unit: Utilization of evidence ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Teachable Unit: Utilization of evidence to construct the tree of life

Group (Fabulous) 5Laura Hake, Jenny Frederick, Carl Hashimoto, Kirsten Fertuck, Bill Rando, Serena MosemanFacilitators: Steve Chordas III, Justin HinesSlide2

Teaching Unit Goals and OutcomesLearning Goals

Learning Outcomes1. Students will understand how morphology is used as evidence to build a tree. Students will use morphological traits to evaluate similarity and differences between organisms. 2. Students will understand how sequence data is used as evidence to build a tree.Students will be able to explain the rationale for using specific genomic sequences.

Given 3 sample sequences, they will analyze and interpret data to explain relationships.

3. Students will understand the limits and

complementarity

of these two types of evidence.

Students will compare the conclusions generated by genetic vs. morphological evolutionary analyses.Slide3

ContextIntroductory general biology course for majors or non-majors

Evolution unit (mid-semester)Topics taught prior to this: -genome composition -definitions of species, phylogenies -reading phylogenetic trees -the value of the tree of life - using trees to evaluate evolutionary relationships

Broader goal:

to illustrate how knowledge

is constructed.Slide4

Check your homework:

How many aliens did you place correctly on the tree?54321 or 0

Prior Assignment: Tree building with aliens

(in Mastering Biology- Pearson)Slide5

Choose the statement that is true about how scientists use evidence to create the tree of life.

(A) The phylogenetic tree was recently updated with new evidence and now it is complete.(B) There are multiple trees of life that are strongly supported by evidence.(C) The purpose of the tree of life is to show how organisms are related to humans.

(D) The increased number of recent revisions to the tree of life suggest that it is no longer a useful tool.

(E) None of the above.Slide6

Learning GoalStudents will understand how morphology is used as evidence to build a phylogenetic tree. Learning outcome

:Students will use morphological traits to evaluate similarities and differences between animals.Tid bit #1: Morphology as evidence Slide7

Deer

Cow

Pig

Hippo

Whale

camelSlide8

Using morphology…

1. Which one animal appears to be most distantly related to the others? 2. Which

two

animals appear to be most closely related to one another?

Record your answers and the

evidence

that supports your choices.

Deer

Cow

Pig

Hippo

whale

CamelSlide9

With more data, we can be more certain about these relationships.What other kinds of evidence could be used?Slide10

Reflection:

How is this process like what scientists do?Slide11

One (of several) traits supporting relationship ASlide12

One (of several) traits supporting relationship A

QUICK CLICK:Which animal is most closely related to the deer?(A) Cow (B) Hippo(C) Pig(D) Camel(E) All are equally relatedSlide13

One (of several) traits supporting relationship ASlide14

Which is true about the use of morphology in tree-building?Morphological evidence is always weaker than molecular evidence.

Morphological evidence has no value for determining evolutionary relationships.Morphological traits are always visible.It is one of many pieces of evidence used to construct trees.Morphology cannot be used for bacteria.Slide15

Evidence That Whales and Hippos Form a Monophyletic Group

Data on the presence and absence of SINE genes support the close relationship between whales and hippos.0 = gene absent1 = gene present? = still undetermined

Whales and hippos share four

unique

SINE genes (4, 5, 6, and 7)

15

Tid bit #2: Sequence data as evidence

…and is later confirmed by fossil evidence!Slide16

Goal of scientific teachingTidbit Elements

Active learningThink pair share, (quick) clickers, reflection (writing), class brainstormAssessmentClicker question, Pre-and post-question, recall (quick click), homework resultsDiversityAbstract approach first to evolution (aliens)Variety of methods: -pictures and text-groups and individual activities- homework in advanceAsked “Record” instead of “write” answer