PPT-THE FUTURE OF FUKUSHIMA

Can nuclear energy overcome its bad rap CHAPTER 27 NUCLEAR FUTURE Learning Outcomes At the end of this chapter you should know As radioactive isotopes decay varying levels of danger may occur. When heated to 300 to 400 degrees Centigrade the crystal releases the energy as luminescence that can be quantified Credit University of South Carolina This is the time of year when birds come out and really spread their wings but since a disastrous ‘Zerorisk mindset’ is a thing of the past(?) Unknown and contested, but potentially very severe fallout hazards. (Health & environmental).Enormous financial costs. (Japan Center for Economic Team Alpha. Student1 Name. , . Student2 . Name, . Student3 . Name, . Student4 . Name, . Student5 . Name . What risks were overlooked in the Fukushima nuclear disaster and what risk controls could have been put in place to avoid this catastrophe?. Binding energy and masses. a) The mass lost when p + e- .  H is 13.6 . ev. .. b) The mass lost when n + . 120. Sn  . 121. Sn is 8,000,000 . eV. .. The nuclear processes. John C. Besley, Ph.D., Associate Professor and Ellis N. Brandt Chair. Part 1: . Publicly reported polls. Part 2: . Academic research. Bisconti. Research for the . Nuclear Energy Institute. (data collection by . 2. What . was the Promise of Nuclear Power. ?. Economic . Cost. Power too cheap to meter. Nuclear fusion – cheap power and no waste. Environmental costs of alternatives. Coal – dirty and dangerous to mine. . Engaging . Artists to Bring Hope and . Healing. . to . Fukishima. , Japan . Eisuke Kanda. FVI. Friends with the Voiceless . Intn’l. Magnitude 9.0. The Great East Japan Earthquake. March 11, 2011 . Radiation and Thyroid . Cancer: Tutorial Session. “Overview of the . Fukushima Health Management Survey”. Time. and Date. : . 14:10-14:55, . February . 21, 2014. Venue. : . Shinagawa Prince Hotel, Tokyo. Applicability of Radiation-Response Models to Low Dose Protection Standards. Tri-Cities, Washington, USA. October 2018. Christopher Clement. ICRP Scientific Secretary. sci.sec@icrp.org. 1. ICRP. international, independent group of scientists, practitioners, policy-makers, and specialists. Gesellschaft für Strahlenschutz e.V. – GSS . Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH – HMGU (i.R.). Für eine Olympiade in Tokyo, die die Gefahren von Fukushima nicht verschweigt. Deutsch-Japanische Gesellschaft Dortmund in der Auslandsgesellschaft.de e.V.. Tomohiro Matsuda 1, Kumiko . Saika. 1, . Eisaku. Sasaki 2, Emiko Ando 3 and Tomotaka Sobue 3. 1. . National Cancer Center, 2 Fukushima Medical University, . 3 Osaka University. IACR2019 Vancouver, Canada. Post - The Safety Culture Challenge World Nuclear University Summer Institute Oxford George Felgate WANO Managing Director August 1, 2012 2 WANO Overview  In 1986, the accident at Chernobyl occ 1 “Post - Fukushima stress tests peer review” Perspectives on the stress tests and peer review ENSREG - Second public Meeting – Brusssels May 8 2012 WANO London Moscow Paris Tokyo Created in f. ollowing the Fukushima Daiichi . NPP . accident. International Workshop on Radiation and Thyroid Cancer. 22 February, Tokyo, JAPAN. Outline. WHO. 's mandate. First-year dose estimation (preliminary dose estimation report).