/
Watchman I: First Report of the 5-Year PROTECT-AF and Exten Watchman I: First Report of the 5-Year PROTECT-AF and Exten

Watchman I: First Report of the 5-Year PROTECT-AF and Exten - PowerPoint Presentation

debby-jeon
debby-jeon . @debby-jeon
Follow
409 views
Uploaded On 2017-10-26

Watchman I: First Report of the 5-Year PROTECT-AF and Exten - PPT Presentation

Vivek Y Reddy MD Helmsley Trust Professor of Medicine Director Cardiac Arrhythmia Service The Mount Sinai Hospital vivekreddymountsinaiorg Grant supportConsultant Boston Scientific ID: 599575

primary rate endpoint stroke rate primary stroke endpoint prevail 2013 watchman patient event protect yrs warfarin 2014 score vasc

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Watchman I: First Report of the 5-Year P..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Watchman I: First Report of the 5-Year PROTECT-AF and Extended PREVAIL Results

Vivek Y. Reddy, MDHelmsley Trust Professor of MedicineDirector, Cardiac Arrhythmia ServiceThe Mount Sinai Hospitalvivek.reddy@mountsinai.org

Grant support/Consultant

: Boston Scientific,

Coherex

Medical, St Jude Medical

I will be discussing the use of non-FDA approved catheter-based devicesSlide2

All faculty disclosures are available on the CRF Events App

and online at www.crf.org/tctSlide3

PROTECT-AF: Overview

Randomized FDA-IDE TrialCan the WATCHMAN device replace Warfarin?Efficacy Endpoint:StrokeCV death (& Unknown)Systemic embolismSafety EndpointNon-inferiority & SuperiorityBayesian Sequential DesignAnalysis at 600 pt-yrs & every 150 pt-yrs thereafter

1500 pt-yr

Follow-up till 5 years

Follow-Up

Non-Valvular AF

CHADs ≥ 1

Randomization (1:2)

Warfarin

Watchman

Anticoagulation Regimen

Implant to 6 weeks

Warfarin (INR 2-3) for 6 weeks

Aspirin (81 – 325 mg)

6 weeks to 6 months

Clopidogrel (75 mg)

Aspirin (81 – 325 mg)

After 6 months

Aspirin (81 – 325 mg)Slide4

PROTECT AF

PREVAILCAPRegistry

CAP2

Registry

Totals

Enrolled

800

461566579

2406

Roll-in

93

54

--

--147Randomized707407----

1114WATCHMAN : warfarin (2:1)463 : 244269 :1385665791877: 382

Patient-years271786020223325931Patient Enrollment Slide5

PROTECT AF

PREVAILCAPRegistry

CAP2

Registry

Totals

Enrolled

800

461566579

2406

Roll-in

93

54

--

--147Randomized707407----

1114WATCHMAN : warfarin (2:1)463 : 244269 :1385665791877: 382

Patient-years271786020223325931Patient Enrollment Slide6

Characteristic

PROTECT AFN=707

PREVAIL

N=407

CAP

N=566

CAP2

N=579Age, mean ± SD72.0 ±

8.9

74.3

±

7.4

74.0 ± 8.3

75.3 ± 8.0Sex (Male)70.3%70.0%

65.5%61.0%Ethnicity / Race

Asian0.7%0.5%1.6%0.7%

Black/Afr. American1.6%1.7%1.9%1.2%Caucasian

91.5%

94.4%

91.9%

94.1%

Hispanic/Latino

5.7%

2.7%

3.5%2.1%Other0.6%0.7%1.1%1.0%

Patient Demographics

* EstimatedSlide7

CAP

96%

PREVAIL

100%

CAP2

100%

Majority of WATCHMAN

Patients are High Risk

Patients

CHA

2

DS

2

-VASc Score

CAP

96%

PREVAIL

100%

CAP2

100%

CHA

2

DS

2

-VASc Score ≥2

PROTECT AF

93%Slide8

CAP

96%

PREVAIL

100%

CAP2

100%

Majority of WATCHMAN

Eligible for Anti-Coagulation

Patients

CHA

2

DS

2

-VASc Score

Anti-coagulation recommended

per ACC/AHA/HRS Guidelines 2014Slide9

PREVAIL Met Safety Primary Endpoint

WATCHMAN(N=269)Events6Patients (%)

2.23%

95% Credible Interval (CrI)

2.65%

Performance Goal (1-sided 95%

CrI

)< 2.67%

Event Rate (95% CrI)

Performance GoalSlide10

Consistent Safety Profile Since Second Half of PROTECT AF

Patients(%)

PROTECT AF

2013

2014

1

st

Half

2

nd

Half

N=232

N=231

N=566

N=269N=579CAPPREVAILCAP2Slide11

 

Event Rate

(per 100 Pt-Yrs)

Rate Ratio

(95% CrI)

Posterior Probability

WATCHMAN

Warfarin

Non-inferiority

Superiority

Primary efficacy

2.2

3.7

0.61

(0.42, 1.07)

>99%

95.4%

Stroke (all)

1.5

2.2

0.68

(0.42, 1.37)

>99%

83%

Ischemic

1.3

1.1

1.25

(0.72, 3.27)

78%

15%

Hemorrhagic

0.2

1.1

0.15

(0.03, 0.49)

>99%

>99%

Systemic embolism

0.2

0.0

N/A

N/A

N/A

Death (CV/unexpl)

1.0

2.3

0.44

(0.26, 0.90)

>99%

99%

PROTECT AF: WATCHMAN Final Primary Efficacy (2717 Pt Yrs)Slide12

 

Event Rate

(per 100 Pt-Yrs)

Rate Ratio

(95% CrI)

Posterior Probability

WATCHMAN

Warfarin

Non-inferiority

Superiority

Primary efficacy

2.2

3.7

0.61

(0.42, 1.07)

>99%

95.4%

Stroke (all)

1.5

2.2

0.68

(0.42, 1.37)

>99%

83%

Ischemic

1.3

1.1

1.25

(0.72, 3.27)

78%

15%

Hemorrhagic

0.2

1.1

0.15

(0.03, 0.49)

>99%

>99%

Systemic embolism

0.2

0.0

N/A

N/A

N/A

Death (CV/unexpl)

1.0

2.3

0.44

(0.26, 0.90)

>99%

99%

PROTECT AF: WATCHMAN Final Primary Efficacy (2717 Pt Yrs)Slide13

 

Event Rate

(per 100 Pt-Yrs)

Rate Ratio

(95% CrI)

Posterior Probability

WATCHMAN

Warfarin

Non-inferiority

Superiority

Primary efficacy

2.2

3.7

0.61

(0.42, 1.07)

>99%

95.4%

Stroke (all)

1.5

2.2

0.68

(0.42, 1.37)

>99%

83%

Ischemic

1.3

1.1

1.25

(0.72, 3.27)

78%

15%

Hemorrhagic

0.2

1.1

0.15

(0.03, 0.49)

>99%

>99%

Systemic embolism

0.2

0.0

N/A

N/A

N/A

Death (CV/unexpl)

1.0

2.3

0.44

(0.26, 0.90)

>99%

99%

PROTECT AF: WATCHMAN Final Primary Efficacy (2717 Pt Yrs)Slide14

PROTECT AF:

All-Cause Mortality All-Cause MortalityHazard Ratio(95% CI)

Posterior

Probability

(Superiority)

p-value

0.69 (0.47, 1.03)

91.4%0.063244

233

222

216

204

192

17616115314393

463403389381372

360352341334324243

WarfarinWATCHMANSlide15

Posterior

Probability2013

93%

2014

93%

PREVAIL: Efficacy Primary Endpoint (2013 and 2014)

18-month Rate Ratio

Non-inferiority

Bayesian model results; Ad hoc analysisSlide16

Posterior

Probability2013

97.6%

2014

89.2%

PREVAIL Ad hoc Analysis: Second Primary Endpoint (2013 vs 2014)

18-month Rate Difference

Non-inferiority

Bayesian model resultsSlide17

Endpoint Event

New First Events Since 2013 PanelWATCHMAN N=269

Warfarin

N=138

n

%

n

%

Primary Efficacy10

3.7

5*

3.6

All Stroke

93.321.4Ischemic83.0

00Hemorrhagic10.42*1.4

Systemic Embolism0000Death (CV or Unexplained)

10.44*2.9PREVAIL-only: New First Events Since 2013 Panel

* One patient had a hemorrhagic stroke followed by death. This was only counted as a single event for the combined primary endpoint per the statistical analysis plan

* One patient had a hemorrhagic stroke followed by death. This was only counted as a single event for the combined primary endpoint per the statistical analysis planSlide18

Endpoint Event

New First Events Since 2013 PanelWATCHMAN N=269

Warfarin

N=138

n

%

n

%

Primary Efficacy10

3.7

5*

3.6

All Stroke

93.321.4Ischemic83.0

00Hemorrhagic10.42*1.4

Systemic Embolism0000Death (CV or Unexplained)

10.44*2.9PREVAIL-only: New First Events Since 2013 Panel

* One patient had a hemorrhagic stroke followed by death. This was only counted as a single event for the combined primary endpoint per the statistical analysis plan

* One patient had a hemorrhagic stroke followed by death. This was only counted as a single event for the combined primary endpoint per the statistical analysis planSlide19

Endpoint Event

Total Endpoint EventsEvent Rate (per 100 pt-yrs)WATCHMAN

N=269

Warfarin

N=138

Composite Primary Efficacy

4.3

3.0Individual Components

All Stroke

2.7

1.0

Ischemic

2.3

0.3Hemorrhagic0.40.7

Systemic Embolism0.20Death (CV or Unexplained)1.42.3PREVAIL-only: Primary Efficacy Rates

* One patient had a hemorrhagic stroke followed by death. This was only counted as a single event for the combined primary endpoint

* One patient had a hemorrhagic stroke followed by death. This was only counted as a single event for the combined primary endpoint per the statistical analysis planSlide20

PREVAIL: Warfarin Stroke Rate Differs from Other Trials

Rate per Patient-years

Trial (Warfarin Arm)

Stroke / Embolism

Rate per 100 pt-yrs

Mean CHADS

2

PREVAIL

2.6

PROTECT AF

2.2

RE-LY

1

2.1ROCKET AF

23.5ARISTOTLE3

2.11. Connolly SJ. N Engl J Med (2009)

; 2. Patel MR. N Engl J Med (2011); 3. Granger CB. N Engl J Med (2011)Slide21

PREVAIL Ischemic Stroke Rate Aligns with Expected Rate

PAF

2013: 1.4

2014: 1.3

PREVAIL

2013: 1.9

2014: 2.3

CHADS VASC

PAF: 3.5PREVAIL: 4.0

Friberg.

Eur Heart J (2012); NICE UK (2014)

CHA

2

DS2-VASc ScoreSlide22

PREVAIL Ischemic Stroke Rate Aligns with Expected Rate

PAF

2013: 1.4

2014: 1.3

PREVAIL

2013: 1.9

2014: 2.3

CHADS VASC

PAF: 3.5PREVAIL: 4.0

Friberg.

Eur Heart J (2012); NICE UK (2014)

CHA

2

DS2-VASc ScoreSlide23

PREVAIL Ischemic Stroke Rate Aligns with Expected Rate

PAF

2013: 1.4

2014: 1.3

PREVAIL

2013: 1.9

2014: 2.3

CHADS VASC

PAF: 3.5PREVAIL: 4.0

Friberg.

Eur Heart J (2012); NICE UK (2014)

CHA

2

DS2-VASc ScoreSlide24

PREVAIL Ischemic Stroke Rate Aligns with Expected Rate

PAF

2013: 1.4

2014: 1.3

PREVAIL

2013: 1.9

2014: 2.3

CHADS VASC

PAF: 3.5PREVAIL: 4.0

Friberg.

Eur Heart J (2012); NICE UK (2014)

CHA

2

DS2-VASc Score

WarfarinSlide25

Now what?Slide26