PPT-Transorbital approach to

dural CCF Dr Rennie Dr Solbach Dr Robertson Dr Brew Dr Cowley Dr Rangi Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology The National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery Queen Square London. “There is nothing in a caterpillar that tells you it’s going to be a butterfly.”. OBJECTIVES OF THE WORKSHOP. General objective: . Explaining the strength-based . approach. Providing the participants with tools. IOCG. deposits in the NT. Anthony . Schofield and . David . Huston. Targeting uranium and copper-gold systems in Australia using a mineral systems approach. Challenges:. ~80% covered. Relatively small footprint of most mineral deposits. The Formalist Approach:. This . approach regards literature as “a unique form of human knowledge that needs to be examined on its own terms.” All the elements necessary for understanding the work are contained within the work itself. . Northeastern University. Yongfang. Cheng. 1. , Yin Wang. 1. , Mario Sznaier. 1. , . Necmiye. Ozay. 2. , . Constantino. M. Lagoa. 3. 1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA. More than You wanted to Know!. Walter Freeman. 3 Types of Lobotomies. Prefrontal leucotomy. Prefrontal lobotomy. Transorbital. lobotomy. Prefrontal Leucotomy. Drilled holes in the top of the skull. Used a . Hey Where’s the Runway?. 1. Missed Approach Segment. A . Missed approach . is a procedure used when an instrument approach cannot be completed to a full-stop landing. The . Missed Approach Segment . in A deep sea mining context. Outline. 2. 3. What . is the. P. recautionary . principle?. 4. Precautionary Principle. Higher . level of environmental protection through precautionary decision-making in the case of . (12 marks). Outline the biological approach - 6 marks. Evaluate the biological approach - 6 marks. Begin your essay by summarising this information in one paragraph. The biological approach treats psychological disorders in the same way as physical disorders. Individual . Diffrences. Evaluation – strengths . Strength. Evidence. Aims to look at the motivations behind behaviour (what causes people to behave the way they do). . E.g. in Griffiths,. the ‘thinking aloud’ aimed to see their irrational reasoning, showing how different types of gambler use different heuristics.. in A deep sea mining context. Outline. 2. 3. What . is the. P. recautionary . principle?. 4. Precautionary Principle. Higher . level of environmental protection through precautionary decision-making in the case of . Under the Guidance of . V.Rajashekhar . M.Tech. Assistant Professor. Presenting By. N.L.Prasanna(13FF1A0503). V.Anjali(14FF5A0501). V.Harish(13FF1A0508). Y.Saikrishna(13FF1A0509). . . Robert D. Blagg. Todd M. Franke. NHSTES – May 28, 2014. 2. Simulation training in public child welfare: An approach to evaluation . Outline. Background & . Context. The Simulation Process. Evaluating . mechanics. Irina Tezaur. 1. , . Maciej. Balajewicz. 2. 1. Extreme Scale Data Science & Analytics Department, Sandia National Laboratories. 2. Aerospace Engineering Department, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Lesson 3. Test: research methods. Objectives:. You will be able to. Outline the assumptions of the humanistic approach. Outline and evaluate humanistic qualitative methods. Evaluate the contribution of humanistic approach in terms of strength, limitations, applications and ethical issues. .