January 9, 2014 COE Faculty 101 - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

January 9, 2014

COE Faculty 101

Teaching/student support (3:30-4:25)

COE advising (15 min)

Center for Teaching and Learning (30 min)Rubrics (10 min)Course Development (4:25-4:40)Assessment and Accreditation COE and OSU (4:40-5:00)***Break (5:00 to 5:30)***Broader Impact Partners (5:30-5:50)***Socialize***

Outline

Summer 2015, all first-year COE students advised centrally

What is advising?

Professional verses Faculty advisingExploration, academic success, career, PIN, curricular, proceduralMyDegreesAdvisors are your friends

COE Central advisors

COE Head Advisor

Brett Jeter

COE Central Advising

Mary

Sarah

Kameron

Michelle Chuinard Kyllo Kadooka White

International and academic success advisingCaine Francis and Nova Schauss  

School Advisors

MIME Advising

Tyler Carrie John NancyDeAdder

Randall Barber Holman

CBEE

Advising

Kristen Richard

Rorrer

Kerr

NERHP Advising

Joan

Stueve

BEE AdvisingRoger Ely

School Advisors

EECS Advising

Calvin Shannon Lizabeth Padma Nicholas

Hughes Reed Marquez Akkaraju

Malos

(

Ecampus

) (

Ecampus)

CCE AdvisingJanice Katie

Nave-Avebele Whitehead

CTL Website (

http

://oregonstate.edu/ctl/) Winter SymposiumTeaching Tools (Rubrics, etc.)Video Introduction to cognition (https://media.oregonstate.edu/media//0_rwgtq59h)Rubrics and more…. (https://media.oregonstate.edu/media//0_k6clrdif)

Center for Teaching and Learning

rubrics

Performance Indicators

1

(unsatisfactory)

2

(satisfactory)

3

(good)

4

(excellent)

Develop process flow diagrams PFDs are incomplete (missing unit operations),  missing or incorrect  standard elements (stream and equipment #s, correct symbols, flow information)

PFDs incorporate appropriate unit operations and conventions, but not all minor elements (utility streams, pumps, etc.)PFDs accurate, thorough, incorporate conventions appropriatelyPFDs incorporate additional processing not explicitly defined in the description based on appropriate process considerations (e.g. minimizing wastePerform economic analyses

 Missing major aspects of costs (capital and manufacturing) or profitability analysesConsiders capital costs and depreciation, manufacturing costs and determines profitability. Substantially complete and somewhat accurate

Complete and relatively accurate cost and profitability analysesComprehensive and accurate assessment of costs, multiple measures of profitability with analysis of meaning, discussion of sensitivity

Optimize design given constraintsNo recognition of constraints and no alternatives consideredConsideration of constraint(s). Attempt to evaluate multiple alternatives

Comprehensive evaluation of multiple alternatives (accurate calculation of costs, profitability) Consideration of multiple constraints

Example Rubric to Assess Design

Performance Indicators

1

(unsatisfactory)

2

(satisfactory)

3

(good)

4

(excellent)

Develop process flow diagrams PFDs are incomplete (missing unit operations),  missing or incorrect  standard elements (stream and equipment #s, correct symbols, flow information)

PFDs incorporate appropriate unit operations and conventions, but not all minor elements (utility streams, pumps, etc.)PFDs accurate, thorough, incorporate conventions appropriatelyPFDs incorporate additional processing not explicitly defined in the description based on appropriate process considerations (e.g. minimizing wastePerform economic analyses

 Missing major aspects of costs (capital and manufacturing) or profitability analysesConsiders capital costs and depreciation, manufacturing costs and determines profitability. Substantially complete and somewhat accurate

Complete and relatively accurate cost and profitability analysesComprehensive and accurate assessment of costs, multiple measures of profitability with analysis of meaning, discussion of sensitivity

Optimize design given constraintsNo recognition of constraints and no alternatives consideredConsideration of constraint(s). Attempt to evaluate multiple alternatives

Comprehensive evaluation of multiple alternatives (accurate calculation of costs, profitability) Consideration of multiple constraints

Example Rubric to Assess DesignSet of criteria that define and describe the important components of the work being evaluated

Performance Indicators

1

(unsatisfactory)

2

(satisfactory)

3

(good)

4

(excellent)

Develop process flow diagrams PFDs are incomplete (missing unit operations),  missing or incorrect  standard elements (stream and equipment #s, correct symbols, flow information)

PFDs incorporate appropriate unit operations and conventions, but not all minor elements (utility streams, pumps, etc.)PFDs accurate, thorough, incorporate conventions appropriatelyPFDs incorporate additional processing not explicitly defined in the description based on appropriate process considerations (e.g. minimizing wastePerform economic analyses

 Missing major aspects of costs (capital and manufacturing) or profitability analysesConsiders capital costs and depreciation, manufacturing costs and determines profitability. Substantially complete and somewhat accurate

Complete and relatively accurate cost and profitability analysesComprehensive and accurate assessment of costs, multiple measures of profitability with analysis of meaning, discussion of sensitivity

Optimize design given constraintsNo recognition of constraints and no alternatives consideredConsideration of constraint(s). Attempt to evaluate multiple alternatives

Comprehensive evaluation of multiple alternatives (accurate calculation of costs, profitability) Consideration of multiple constraints

Example Rubric to Assess Design

Provides clear targets of proficiency to studentsEnables unambiguous assessment of qualitative tasksPromotes consistency between multiple

evaluators

Creative Thinking

Critical Thinking

Ethical ReasoningGlobal LearningInquiry and AnalysisIntercultural Knowledge and CompetenceFoundation and Skills for Lifelong LearningOral CommunicationProblem SolvingQuantitative LiteracyTeamworkWritten CommunicationValue Rubrics

Developed

by the Association of American Colleges and Universities

Problem Solving Rubric

So….you want to offer a new course.

Review plans with School’s curriculum committee

Develop a syllabus with the required contentOptionsOffer under a blanket course #New course #Online Curriculum Proposal System

Course Development

Visit “Course Proposals” from right menu of APAA

(

http://drupaldev.cws.oregonstate.edu/apaa/academic-programs/home)Checklist for proposalsCommon problemsSyllabus templateBlooms taxonomySelect “Curriculum Proposal System” from top menu of APAAOSU Course proposal

By Program (ABET)

6 year cycle

Single self-study report due at year 6by University (NWCCU)7 year cycleReports every 2 years with different contentAccreditation

Effect on you (typical faculty)?

Course outcomes (on your syllabus) must map to specific program outcomes

Must complete course reflection after each course

During year 5 and 6 collect graded student work

Help with proposal project description and budget

Work with PI to develop integration

Implement, administer and assess broader impact project Deliver material for final reportsBroader Impact Partners will…