/
Improving Survey Response Rates: The Effect of Embedded Questions in Web Survey Email Improving Survey Response Rates: The Effect of Embedded Questions in Web Survey Email

Improving Survey Response Rates: The Effect of Embedded Questions in Web Survey Email - PowerPoint Presentation

doggcandy
doggcandy . @doggcandy
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2020-08-06

Improving Survey Response Rates: The Effect of Embedded Questions in Web Survey Email - PPT Presentation

Nick Inchausti SurveyMonkey Mingnan Liu Facebook Response Rates 2 Response rates are a critical indicator of data quality for surveys and we as survey researchers are always trying to get to 100 response ID: 800143

embedded survey question email survey embedded email question rate standard response respondents data condition click rates effect higher invitation

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Improving Survey Response Rates: The Eff..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Improving Survey Response Rates: The Effect of Embedded Questions in Web Survey Email Invitations

Nick

Inchausti

, SurveyMonkey

Mingnan

Liu, Facebook

Slide2

Response Rates

2

Response rates are a critical indicator of data quality for surveys, and we as survey researchers are always trying to get to 100% response

For mixed-mode or web surveys, email invitations are widely used as the first point of contact to reach respondents

We wanted to find out what happens if you begin data collection in the initial survey invitation itself?

Slide3

Literature Review

3

Email personalization sometimes boosts response rates

(

Heerwegh

, 2005

), but sometimes has no effect

(Porter & Whitcomb,

2003)

A white

background and simple header had higher response rates than other conditions (Whitcomb & Porter, 2004

)

Mentioning

the purpose of an email (requesting for survey participation) and the sponsor of the survey in the email subject line also had an impact on survey participation (Porter & Whitcomb, 2005

)

Several

other factors, including the length of the email, placement of the URL, and the estimated time of the survey, have also been explored in survey experiments in order to improve survey participation and response rate (

Kaplowitz

,

Lupi

, Couper, & Thorp, 2012;

Keusch

, 2012;

Trouteaud

, 2004).

Slide4

Research Question

4

New product feature: ability to embed survey question within an email

Research Question: Do survey invitations that include an embedded question have higher response rates than standard invitations?

Click rate

Completion rate

Data quality check: comparison of responses to the first question

Slide5

Embedded Question

5

Screenshot:

standard

survey invitation email

Screenshot:

embedded

survey invitation email

Slide6

Experiment Design

6

Sample frame: group of SurveyMonkey customers who had agreed to participate in research projects and provided their email addresses

Data collected July 27 – August 8, 2016

Initial email invitation to complete a survey, follow-up reminder 4 days later

Random assignment into 1/2 conditions: standard and embedded first question

4333 valid emails for embedded condition

4347 valid emails for standard condition

13-question

survey, identical in each condition

Experience with SurveyMonkey

Satisfaction with the survey platform

Interest in additional features

Slide7

Results – Improved email click rate

7

Higher click rate for embedded survey than the standard survey (32.0% vs. 26.2%)

Statistically significant p<.001

This means that respondents in the embedded condition were more likely to

click on the embedded question and start the survey than the respondents in the standard condition to click on the “Begin survey” button.

Slide8

Results – Improved survey completion rate

8

Higher completion rate for the embedded survey than the standard survey (29.1% vs. 24.4%)

Statistically significant p<.001

Completion rate =

# complete

# sent

Slide9

Results – Small negative effect on survey drop-out rate

9

The proportion of respondents who completed the survey divided by the number who clicked int

o the survey was slightly higher for those in the standard condition…

Which means that the embedded version had a slightly higher drop-out rate…

But this difference is not statistically significant (p=.07).

 

Valid email

Clicked

Completed

% Completed/Clicked

Embedded

4333

1388

1261

90.8%

Standard

4347

1141

1059

92.8%

Slide10

Results – No effect on data quality

10

Do we get different responses when we ask a question embedded in an email vs. in the survey itself?

No.

The ratio

of the two NPS scores between the embedded and standard email invites was 0.98, suggesting the two responses to the first question were almost identical for the two conditions.

Slide11

Summary of Results

11

Using an emailed survey invitation with the first question embedded:

Improves the email click rate

Improves the survey completion rate

Has only a small negative effect on the survey drop-out rate

Has no effect on data quality, in terms of responses to the first (embedded) question

Slide12

Discussion

12

Overall, successful test for adding a new feature.

Additional advantage:

even if respondents drop out

of the

survey, their answers to the first question will be recorded in the embedded condition. In the standard condition, if respondents drop out before completing the first page, all data will be lost.   

 

Future research opportunities:

Embedding more than one question

(or the whole survey

?) in the email itself

Experimenting with different survey lengths and question types

Will this work with a different population of respondents?

Slide13

Thank you

13

Contact us at:

Nicki@surveymonkey.com

Mingnanliu@fb.com