Jennifer J Telford MD MPH FRCPC CSGNA September 22 2017 Victoria BC Objectives Tips to a difficult cannualtion Management of large stones Management of benign biliary strictures Prevention of postERCP pancreatitis ID: 917175
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "ERCP: This changed my practice" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
ERCP: This changed my practice
Jennifer J. Telford MD MPH FRCPC
CSGNA September 22, 2017
Victoria, BC
Slide2Objectives
Tips to a difficult cannualtion
Management of large stones
Management of benign biliary strictures
Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis
Slide3Difficult biliary cannulation
In expert hands, selective cannulation is achieved in over 90%
Difficult bile duct cannulation
10 minutes
>
5 attempts (continuous contact with the papilla)
Increased risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis
Slide4Alternative techniques
Double
guidewire
technique
Pre-cut sphincterotomy
EUS-guided biliary access
Percutaneous biliary access
Slide5Double-guidewire (DGW) technique
Inadvertent PD guidewire cannulation
Place the first wire into the PD and remove the sphincterotome
Re-attempt biliary cannulation with a second guidewire
The first wire facilitates cannulation by straightening the
intraduodenal
segment of the common channel
Variation on this technique is to place a PD stent
Slide6Slide7Double-guide wire technique
3 randomized trials have assessed DGW in difficult biliary cannulation
Pooled success rate 58% (range 47%-79%)
Pooled PEP rate 22% (range 17%-38%)
Similar success rate to persisted cannualtion and pre-cut
papillotomy
Slide8How I changed my practice
In a difficult biliary cannulation, if the guidewire cannulates the PD, then the double guidewire technique is used prior to a pre-cut
papillotomy
Slide9Difficult CBD stones
Up to 15% of bile duct stones cannot be removed by conventional methods
Large size relative to duct/papilla
Distal stricture
Intra-hepatic location
Slide10Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation
With or without endoscopic sphincterotomy
Through-the-scope balloon is passed over a guidewire into the bile duct to dilate the papilla and distal bile duct
B
alloon
dilation
(12-20 mm)
Minimum = size of largest stone
Maximum = size of bile
duct
Inflate slowly in a step-wise fashion
Maintain inflation until waist disappears (30-60 sec)
Slide11Slide12Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation
International Consensus for EPLBD. GIE 2016;83:37
Indication
Large bile duct stones as an alternative to mechanical lithotripsy
Repeat procedures with prior sphincterotomy
In place of sphincterotomy in patients with coagulopathy
Slide13How I changed my practice
If a large stone is identified on
cholangiogram
, a moderate sphincterotomy is performed and then EPLBD is performed prior to mechanical lithotripsy
Particularly when the distal bile duct diameter is less than the stone or the papilla is small
Slide14Cholangioscopy
Cholangioscopy
= scoping the bile duct
Cholangioscope
passes through the accessory channel of the
duodenoscope
single
operator possible
Sphincterotomy
Cannulate
the bile duct directly or over a previously placed guidewire
Cholangioscope
has a channel to pass biopsy forceps or a lithotripsy wire into the duct
Slide15Slide16Cholangioscopic EHL
EHL fiber is passed up the accessory channel of the
choloangioscope
High amplitude hydraulic pressure waves fragments the stone
Stone fragments are withdrawn with a biliary extraction basket or balloon
~90% success rate for complex stones
Slide17Cholangioscopy complications
Infection
Bactermia
9%
Cholangitis in 7%
Prophylactic antibiotics
P
erforation if EHL probe touches bile duct wall or with prolonged EHL sessions due to heat generated
B
leeding
Slide18Cholangioscopic
tissue acquisition
Indeterminate bile duct strictures
Suspected malignant but non-diagnostic brushing or biopsy during ERCP or EUS
Slide19Other indications
Guidewire placement
Pancreatic duct
Tissue acquisition
Pancreaticolithiasis
Radiofrequency ablation of
intraductal
neoplasms
Slide20How I changed my practice
For suspicious bile duct strictures with a negative brushing,
cholangioscopic
biopsy is performed at the next ERCP
For unsuccessful stone removal, a stent is placed and the case re-booked with
cholangioscopic
EHL
Slide21Management of benign biliary strictures
Plastic stents (single or multiple) have been the standard of care for many years
Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents (
cSEMS
)
Larger diameter
Patent longer
Therapeutic
Easy to insert
Ability to be removed
Increased cost of device but fewer ERCPs
Migration rate ~ 30%
Slide22Fully covered SEMS for benign biliary strictures
Coté
et al. JAMA 2016;315:1250-1257
Randomized 112 patients to
cSEMS
vs. multiple plastic stents
S
tricture resolution at 12 months
cSEMS
93% Plastic 85%
Require fewer ERCPs
Complication rate was similar but more
cSEMS
migrated
Slide23Slide24How I changed my practice
For benign distal biliary strictures
Insert a fully covered SEMS for 6 months
If the stricture has not resolved, then insert a second fully covered SEMS repeat for another 6 months
At 12 months, if the stricture has not resolved, then I consider endoscopic therapy to have failed and refer to surgery
Slide25Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis
Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in 10% in the placebo arm of trials
PEP occurs in up to 30% of high risk individuals
Overall mortality rate from PEP is 0.7%
Decreased with avoiding diagnostic ERCPs, early pre-cut, PD stent, adequate IV hydration
Contradictory data regarding NSAIDs for PEP prevention, particularly in average-risk patients
Slide26Indomethacin to prevent PEP
Patai
et al. GIE 2017;85:1144
Systematic review of NSAIDS to prevent PEP
4741 patients from 17 trials
Decreased rate of PEP 0.60 (95%CI 0.46-0.78, p=0.0001)
NNT 20
Rectal administration better than oral
Effective for average and high risk patients
Slide27Indomethacin + Ringer’s Lactate to prevent PEP
Mok
et al. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2017;85:1005-13.)
Randomized 192 high risk patients to:
Saline bolus + placebo suppository (21%)
Saline bolus + indomethacin suppository (13%)
Ringer’s lactate bolus + placebo suppository (19%)
Ringer’s lactate bolus + indomethacin suppository 6%
Ringer’s lactate + indomethacin superior to placebo in decreased PEP and hospital re-admission
Ringer’s lactate 1L infused over 30 minutes pre-ERCP
Limited by small sample size
Slide28How I changed my practice
P
atients at high risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis based on patient characteristics or planned procedure receive indomethacin 100 mg suppository prior to ERCP
Patients at high risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis based on the ERCP receive indomethacin 100 mg suppository following the ERCP
I have proposed to our ERCP group to routinely give indomethacin 100 mg suppository to all patients following ERCP
Slide29Summary
Cannulation
–
DGW following inadvertent wire cannulation of PD
Big stones
–
Papillary balloon dilation
Big stones
–
Cholangioscopic
EHL
Indeterminate strictures
–
Cholangioscopic
biopsy
PEP prevention
–
Indomethacin 100 mg rectally post ERCP
Slide30Thank you