Michael Drabkin MD Margaret Steiner Isael Perez Steven Lev MD Nassau University Medical Center eEdE106 Purpose To review and classify causes of errors in diagnostic neuroradiology via a casebased approach with a focus on strategies for error prevention for the oncall resident ID: 549903
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "A Comedy of Errors: Identifying, Classif..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
A Comedy of Errors: Identifying, Classifying and Preventing Cognitive and Perceptual Errors in Neuroradiology
Michael Drabkin MD Margaret Steiner, Isael Perez, Steven Lev MDNassau University Medical Center
eEdE-106Slide2
Purpose
To review and classify causes of errors in diagnostic neuroradiology, via a case-based approach, with a focus on strategies for error prevention for the on-call residentSlide3
Approach/Methods
Various systems for the classification of radiologic diagnostic errors have been proposed, encompassing perception, interpretation, communication and technical
factors
. We retrospectively reviewed our database of resident- attending discrepancies of emergency and trauma cases at our level-1 trauma center over a span of 10 years. We then organized and classified the cases based on several criteria. Slide4
Approach/Methods
Errors were first divided into two groups, perceptual and cognitive. We further divided cognitive errors into false positives, false negatives, and misjudgments in which the abnormality was identified but misinterpreted.
Preliminary Report Error Identified
Perceptual
CognitiveSlide5
Interpretation
Radiologist looks for deviations from a mental template. Any variation from this template will raise concern for pathology. Slide6
Cognitive ErrorsSlide7
Bias
Despite identical levels of knowledge and training, two different radiologists may be inclined to different interpretations. This is dependent on several biases, stemming both from the radiologist’s temperament internally and also from the external circumstances.They may have a different bias/criterion
.
Raising one’s threshold to call an abnormality will decrease the false positive rate, but may also lead to more misses.
Likewise, lowering one’s threshold will decrease the false negative rate, but will also lead to more overcalls.Slide8
Cognitive Biases
AnchoringFramingSatisfaction of search
Multiple alternative bias
Availability Bias
Outcome biasSlide9
Anchoring
Locking onto a diagnosis from the beginningRelying too heavily on the first piece of information offeredUndervaluing data that would support an alternative diagnosis or that does not support the favored diagnosis (similar to confirmation bias). Slide10
Framing
Arriving at a conclusion based on how information is presented or “framed” Slide11
Satisfaction of Search
An eye-catching finding grabs the attention and diverts from consideration of other diagnoses.May lead to missed comorbidities, complications, or additional diagnoses. Slide12
Multiple Alternative Bias
Narrowing a list of diagnostic possibilities to a smaller subset with which a physician is most familiar.May fail to consider other possibilities. Slide13
Availability Bias
Considering a diagnosis more likely because it easily comes to mind.A notion that things which first come to must be important/relevant.Slide14
Outcome Bias
An optimistic radiologist might favor a diagnosis with a better outcome for the patient than one with a more harmful outcome. Slide15
Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage
Lesson
A unilateral high density in the basal ganglia should alert one to the possibility of hemorrhage and warrant follow-up examination. Bilateral basal ganglia high densities, on the other hand, often represent calcification. Density measurements are helpful, but can sometimes be misleading due to partial volume averaging.
Bilateral basal ganglia calcifications were overcalled as hemorrhage. Bilateral basal ganglia calcifications occur commonly as patients age.Slide16
Subdural Hematoma
Noncontrast Head CT demonstrating an overcall of an anterior interhemispheric fissure subdural hematoma due to “hematocrit effect” in neonates.Slide17
Satisfaction of search
Fixation on a large intraparecnchymal hemorrhage lead to overlooking the coexisting subarachniod hemorrhage.This large MCA aneurysm was an unusual cause of intraparenchymal bleed. Recognizing the SAH was important in prompting CTA.
Axial CT of 46 y/o female with headache shows large intraparenchymal bleed, with subarachnoid components and mild left to right shift.
Subarachnoid HemorrhageSlide18
Subacute Infarct
There is superficial enhancement of the brain parenchyma in distribution of the middle cerebral artery in a patient with recent infarct. This can be mistaken for subarachnoid hemmorhage.Slide19
Virchow-Robin spaces
A young patient with bilateral symetric well-defined hypodensities in the basal ganglia.These represent enlarged Virchow-Robin spaces.However, this can be mistaken for lacunar infarcts.Slide20
Cavernous Malformations
Initially interpreted as hemorrhage
.
Axial
T2WI in the same “trauma” patient reveals the right frontal (and left basal ganglia)
density
to be
a
caveroma
,
demonstrating mixed signal intensity and
“
popcorn
” appearance. The right frontal lesion shows a dark signal
hemosiderin
rim. Slide21
Perceptual ErrorsSlide22
Perceptual ErrorsSlide23
Contrast, Mach Bands, and the Background Effect
The Mach phenomenon exaggerates the contrast between edges of the slightly differing shades of gray where they meet. This enhances edge-detection by the human visual system.An interesting phenomenon is background contrast effect, where the perceived brightness of an object is affected by a neighboring object’s optical density. Slide24
Contrast, Mach Bands, and the Background Effect
In the figure below, the central grey squares all appear to have different densities, however, when the background is eliminated it is apparent that the small squares have the same gray levels.Slide25
Contrast, Mach Bands, and the Background Effect
In the figure below, the central grey squares all appear to have different densities, however, when the background is eliminated it is apparent that the small squares have the same gray levels.Slide26
Effect of Neighboring Density
There is diffuse cerebral edema in this 18 year-old male who experimented with cocaine. The vessels appear hyperdense against the dark parenchyma causing a “pseudosubarachnoid” hemorrhage effect.
Focal sparing of gray matter within an infarct may mimic hemorrhage as seen in the above block diagram and companion case.Slide27
Normal or Mass Lesion?
We try to complete shapes and objects. The line drawings below are created when we try to connect the dots. When four dots are present, some of us may see a square, others, perhaps more imaginative, see various shapes and forms emerge. The on-call resident questioned whether the patient to the right had a right parietal well circumscribed mass. This necessitated an overnight stay for the patient and follow-up imaging. Needless to say, the “mass” disappeared on follow-up? Was this a cure by repeat CT or an erroneous interpretation of sulcal lines that created the illusion of an object? Subjective contours
caused by the need for completeness create
pseudolesions
that can be mistaken for real ones.Slide28
Normal or Mass Lesion?
We try to complete shapes and objects. The line drawings below are created when we try to connect the dots. When four dots are present, some of us may see a square, others, perhaps more imaginative, see various shapes and forms emerge. The on-call resident questioned whether the patient to the right had a right parietal well circumscribed mass. This necessitated an overnight stay for the patient and follow-up imaging. Needless to say, the “mass” disappeared on follow-up? Was this a cure by repeat CT or an erroneous interpretation of sulcal lines that created the illusion of an object? Subjective contours
caused by the need for completeness create
pseudolesions
that can be mistaken for real ones.Slide29
Subjective
Contour Formation“Subjective contours” are the result of mental completion of partial lines to form familiar or expected shapes. These
contours are illusions formed by extending lines and boundaries. This can create the illusion of a pathologic lesion.Slide30
Perceptual Grouping
Perceptual grouping is a means by which the brain arranges objects according to certain available visual cues. In the Kanizsa triangle illusion, the positioning of black three-quarter circles in the “correct” orientation results in the appearance of a central white triangle, even though none really exists. The neural circuitry required involves the pathways connecting the lateral geniculate nucleus, V1, and V2. Slide31
Fogging Effect
Noncontrast Head CT demonstrating the fogging effect 2 days later, which can be missed depending on the timingSlide32
Discussion
It is imperative to both perceive and accurately interpret abnormal findings in order to facilitate appropriate and expeditious radiologic workup and clinical management. Slide33
Discussion
Perceptual errors are related to scanning, fixation, satisfaction of search, and the inherent characteristics of the human visual system, such as subjective contour formation and the Mach effect. Slide34
Discussion
A major contributor to cognitive false positive and false negative errors is misconstruing normal variants, especially pertaining to bony and vascular anatomy; errors in interpretation frequently involve infarcts and hemorrhages. These types of misjudgments may be caused by incomplete knowledge, misleading clinical history, and anchoring bias. Slide35
Discussion
The adverse consequences of misinterpretations include prolonged hospitalization, unnecessary testing and procedures, and needless patient anxiety.Slide36
Discussion
Strategies for improvement include maintaining a missed-case database which can be drawn from as an opportunity for learning. It is essential to communicate with referring physicians, assess for distinguishing radiologic features and consider all possible etiologies, however unlikely.Slide37
Summary/Conclusion
By utilizing such a system of error classification in conjunction with maintaining an organized case database, institutions may be able to provide improve quality in
neuroradiologic
diagnostic
imaging
.Slide38
Thank You