/
What do we mean in law when we say ‘guilty beyond a reaso What do we mean in law when we say ‘guilty beyond a reaso

What do we mean in law when we say ‘guilty beyond a reaso - PowerPoint Presentation

ellena-manuel
ellena-manuel . @ellena-manuel
Follow
398 views
Uploaded On 2016-10-14

What do we mean in law when we say ‘guilty beyond a reaso - PPT Presentation

REASONABLE DOUBT The phrase beyond a reasonable doubt is a very important part of our criminal justice system A reasonable doubt is not a far fetched or frivolous doubt It is not a doubt based on sympathy or prejudice It is a doubt based on reason and common sense It is a doubt ID: 475514

reasonable doubt evidence guilty doubt reasonable guilty evidence noa guilt based find offence proof crown counsel lack case certainty

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "What do we mean in law when we say ‘gu..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

What do we mean in law when we say ‘guilty beyond a reasonable doubt’?

REASONABLE DOUBTSlide2

The phrase, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, is a very important part of our criminal justice system.

A reasonable doubt is

not

a far fetched or frivolous doubt. It is not a doubt based on sympathy or prejudice. It is a doubt based on reason and common sense. It is a doubt that logically arises from the evidence, or the lack of evidence.

It is

not

enough for you to believe that the (NOA) is/are probably or likely guilty. In those circumstances, you must find him/her/them not guilty, because Crown counsel would have failed to satisfy you of his/her/their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Proof of probably or likely guilt is

not

proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.Slide3

You should also remember, however, that it is nearly impossible to prove anything with absolute certainty. Crown counsel is

not

required to do so. Absolute certainty is standard of proof that is impossib

l

y high.

If, at the end of the case, based on all of the evidence, you are sure that (NOA) committed the (an) offence, you should find (NOA) guilty of it, since you would have been satisfied of his/her/their guilt of that offence beyond a reasonable doubt.

If, at the end of the case, based on all of the evidence or the lack of evidence, you are

not

sure that (NOA) committed the (an) offence, you should find him/her/them

not

guilty of it.