especiaunequa - PDF document

1 Her Doi: 1 0 In D. R especiaunequa The
Her Doi: 1 0 In D. R especiaunequa The o bj selecte zones i n rando influen Keywo Internati t address: N e d: August 1 0 .5296 lly in Sou t l distributi o bj ective of t u l ocks with i 11995, t these f o a l the yield w here and C ceous fora g g e Leg u S outh- . D. Katu n F or Tropic a titute of St u Buk E-mail: ka t J. rsité OfficiE-mail: je a A ccepted: URL: htt p e is still m o vince. D e is to test a 26, 2 p ://dx. anaged in e mographic tro Interna t t icipatory e v w a model s . In spite o s Cook, he farmer s . All the ac c s Adaptatio n J A daptat . R. C o s ponding a u u re (CIAT), B A griculture b lished: No v j ab.v3i1.65system wi t o n the lan d d herbace o A gricultura using var i areas. For a i c soils, for a D. intortu m systems. V. unguicu l e ases and i n p articipato pplied Biot e ISSN 2015, Vol. www.macrot R. Congo ember 4, 2 0 48 h crop in t d is highl ILRI in the b with a remov sample that re a herbac some f o Sampl ADF, 2.2 Fa r Farmer 5 men 2.3 Da t Descri of vari a analys 3. Res u 3.1 Ag r

2 3.2 Nut r 4 Cook), V 1 31-2) and ac
3.2 Nut r 4 Cook), V 1 31-2) and aced in the b locks with i zation cutt e d off ste m alia brasili e , all other l i c , 1998). S i of about 3 0 h arvest and a ched 40-4 5 e ous with l i o rage (g) × e s have bee n A DL and T A beba, Eth i r mers Parti c s evaluatio n per locati o d plots by d n . After th e s us (Stür et t a Analysis p tive statist nce (ANO V e s in Past S o u lts r ritive Valu e V igna ung u Desmodiu hole befor e 3 replicate s 0.25 m an d ings were m m s and we r e nsis, Clito r i nes of the u i x overall c 0 0 g leave s was put u n 5 °C in bri ttle stems) Dry mater n analyzed o T IVOMD) opia. c ipatory Ev a n was done o n and sea s d ropping a e choice of i cs were co m V A), graph s o ftware. luation s o f Forag e u iculata (C I m intortum e the planta t s . Every pl o d 0.5 m be t m ade in Ja n r e weighe d r ia ternate a u seful plot c uttings w e s and 300 g n til consta n ghtened ti m yield (M F (%) / Su ( m o n reflecta n at the In t a luation during the s on indicat i w hite pape r fora

3 ges, th e m puted and s in STAT V e
ges, th e m puted and s in STAT V e s IAT IT95 K as a local c t ion at the t w o t measure d t ween line s n uary, 201 1 d separatel y a , Lablab p u and border s e re made o g of stems b n t weight d u m e. The m e F LSY) in k g m ) × 10, ( K n ce spectro s t ernational rainy and d i ng prefere n r . Data we r e two tea m d difference s V IEW softw J K 52-34, C I c ontrol. Fo u w o sites. F o d 3 m × 3 m s . At avera g 1 in Nyang e y for the u rpureus, were cut ( o ver eight w b y accessio n u ring at le a e an fresh l e g ha = F r K atunga, 20 s copy for n u Livestock ry season a n ces accor d r e presente d m s gathered s of MFLS Y a re, Cluste r J ournal of A AT IT97 K u r handsha k o rages were . The seedl g e 50% flo w e zi and Tu b herbaceou igna ungui c ( Schultz-K eeks. A h n and / or s st three m o e aves and s r esh leaves 04), Su is t h u trient cont e Research t both sites d ing to ow n d as ranks o to discuss a Y were esta b r analyses a n A pplied Biot e ISSN 2015, Vol. www.macrot 1069-6 an k es of

4 cow e installed r a l ing were s e w
cow e installed r a l ing were s e w ering in a b imbi. Lea v s with littl c ). Af t r aft &Tole d h omogeneo pecie was o nths in a s s tems (onl y and / or s t t he net plot e nts (DM, O Institute (I s with 5 wo m w n criteria. o f preferen c and reach a b lished by A a nd Corresp e chnology 327-0640 3, No. 1 h in .org/jab d CIAT manure ndomly t in line a ll plots, v es were e stems t er every o, 1990; u s fresh s un drier y for the t ems for M, CP, m en and Farmers e at the a gender A nalysis In gene r guiane ranks 3 p urpur 4 was o V. The fol l In Nya n p urpur Tubim S. gui a intortu 11995,differe c b Table 4 e ral, the for a r e 1 meani n n and zi were 21603 a and 4 wer e 21603 a I n Tubimbi o bserved in u nguiculata 1. The reco v n gezi the b e 22759, b C. brasil i a Co o m L. purp u and Tubim b S. guiane n n ce of reco v c ant differe n n the forag e m ass Prod u shows the a ges were n n g without g uianensis p urpureus 2 a L. pur p e also obs e a nd pests V with the r a the two sit e 52-34.

5 u res show t h v ery of the b est rec
u res show t h v ery of the b est recove r L. purpu re i ensis k. Forage s u reus C. brasi l n sis ery rates b e n �ce (P0.0 5 e �s (P0.05) . u ction a ot consider a impact of d Cook. For a 2 2759, ureus 227rved in Ny V . unguicul a a nk 3, for d i e s on disea s h e height a n forages (% ) r y was per f e 21603, m D. int o s with a b 9 S. guian e l iensis C. m a V. un g e tween the f 5 ). In Tubi m . a ss fresh an d ably attack e d iseases an d a ges fairly a m and . 59. Fodde r angezi occ u a ta seases wer e s es with V. d recovery ) Figu r f ormed by D , S. guian e L. p b etter heig h e 1199 5 m olle, D. in t g uiculata 3 forages (P m bi the ra t d stems yie l J e d by disea s d pests in N a ttacked by . intortum a r s most att a u V. unguicu e C. brasili e u nguiculat e 2. The h e D . intortu m e 1199 5 urpureus 2 h t were in 5 S. guian e t ortum, L. p 3 1-2. In N y 0.05) wher t es of reco v l d accordin g J ournal of A s es and pes t N yangezi a n diseases a n a nd for Tub i a cked by d i C. bra

6 silie n 131-2 e and C a 1069-6, V
silie n 131-2 e and C a 1069-6, V . a t the sites. e ight (cm) o m C. brasil i S. guian e 2 S. gu e Cook p urpureus 2 y angezi th e e as for the h v ery and h e g to season s A pplied Biot e ISSN 2015, Vol. www.macrot s. Fodders n d Tubimbi n d insects, r i mbi D. int o i seases and n sis C. ter n V. un g C . ternatea, unguicula t o f forages i C. m e Coo k C. brasili e V. un g S. g u e re is a si g h eight ther e e ight did n o s . chnology 327-0640 3, No. 1 h in .org/jab that had ank 2 in o rtum, L. insects, atea, L. g uiculatathe rank t 131-2 m olle and in D. uiculata g was no o t differ Table 4 e C. bras i C. moll e C. tern D. into r L. pu pu S. V. un g u i V. un g u i V. un g u i Lsd (p n.m*= differe Tubim the pro d are cla s Forage . Yield pro d e ous legum e i liensis 170 0 e 15160 a 20692 r tum reus 3 u reus 9 n 1199 5 n Cook 106 9 i culata 131 - i culata 52- 3 0,05) ing to seas o n ce (P 0 b i. During t ion of fod d d uction of f s sified in t w s with the b D . intortu m m e was the s

7 a d uction per e s Rai 9 950.0 ± 1000.
a d uction per e s Rai 9 950.0 ± 1000. 62.0± 1316. 368.0 ± 9 568.0 ± 5 1807. 0 1593. -6 88.0± 9 - 2 42.0± 1 3 4 190.0 ± 1130. d ns, Turke y 0 1) betwee n the dry s e d ers in the d f odders in t h w o groups. b est yield i n m , S. guia n a me except season (M F n y season y angezi 945.8ab ±353.4ab 9.3bc ±1147.8ab 386.8bc 402.1b ±1639.7a ±809.7ab 4.5bc 6.1bc 171.3bc y test gathe r n the produ c ason, ther e d ry season. h e dry seas o the rainy s n ensis 119 C. bra s 18 LSY mea n Tubi 1226.0±6 130.8±26918.0±79 182.0±13 484.0±42 1055.0±4 1128.0±6 64.0±59. 65.0±80. 132.0±19 689.2 s means in c tion of the e is a sig n In Tubimb o n. At both eason wer e 9 5 and S. iliensis i J n s kg ha-1 m .4ab 30 7 7.1a 571.6bc n. m 7 .3ab 39 7 .7bc 47 9 .5b 56 7 2.7ab11 0.2ab72 bc n. m 4 bc n. m 3 .4bc n. m 58 two classe s biomass i n ificant dif f i there is n o sites and a c e the same a g uianensis ch perfor m J ournal of A D ry season Nyangezi 0.1±207.3b 2.0±22.1ab m 2.0±221.4b .0±0bc 3.0±218.9b 88.0±204.5 a 1.0±370ab m m 0.2 . T

8 here is a rainy seas o f erence (P o
here is a rainy seas o f erence (P o differenc e c cording to a t both sitesCook. In t m ed well on l A pplied Biot e ISSN 2015, Vol. www.macrot Tub 513.0± 2 1814.0 573.0± 4 n.m n.m 325.0± 3 1162.3 a highly si g o n in Nyan g 0.05) bet w e � (P0.05) b seasons, t h C. brasili e t he dry se a l y in Tubi m e chnology 327-0640 3, No. 1 h in .org/jab imbi 57.1ab 1263.2a 57.9b 63.9ab 91.7ab ezi and w een the b etween e means e nsis, C. a son the m bi. and Cp . The fi g intortu 3.5 Pa r Table 5 Table 5*n,m.: In gen e sites. T h guiane farmer C. bras i C. moll e C. tern D. into r L . pu pu S. V. un g u i V. un g u i V. un g u i . The eigen g ure shows m S. guian e r ticipatory shows the f n ot mentio n e ral, the fa r h e forages c n 11995. s while taki n h erbaceous i 15160 a 20692 r reus reus 1199 i value of th e that fodde r e 11995 E valuation forage cho i f armers’ ch o n e d r mer’s choi c c hosen are Figure 6 n legumes 3 9 5 3 4 - 2 9 e two first a r s are clas s , S. guiane n 0 f Forag

9 e H ces of the fa o ice c e of forag
e H ces of the fa o ice c e of forag o f gender a n Rainy yang 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 xes was 9 9 s ified in t w n sis Cook a n H erbaceous r mers. g es is not d i C. brasilie n correspon nd the seas o s aison e zi T u 1 4000300 J 9 .9%. w o groups i n d C. moll e Legumes fferent bet w n sis,S. gui a d ence anal y o n. bimbi ournal of A i n which t h e . w een the t w a Co o y sis of the Dry sai s N yange 3 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 pplied Biot e ISSN 2015, Vol. www.macrot e best inc l w o seasons o C. moll e fodders c h s on z i Tu b 2 1 0 3 0 4 0 0 chnology 327-0640 3, No. 1 h in .org/jab D. in both e S. osen by b imbi Cook, farmer the acc e was se n indicat Refere Ayisi, and Yi e Africa Uwum Cox, T . Kivu. M., … crop-li l'estim raising Comm . molle a cropping s e ssions of V n sitive to d o r for agro ces . K., Bopa p e ld of Div e ” In Tropica b y A.M. W h e nda, M., S u kiza, D. ( 2 o ns. sar R w . P. (2011). .doi.org/1 amps, S., v Oberson estock sys m CIAT Co l a, M. M. D a tion de l a q ue). Cahie r a, M. M. D in

10 tegrating 12 p. Facu l g , B. A., C a y
tegrating 12 p. Facu l g , B. A., C a y challenge s in the Afr i e , P. H., M m be, N. ( 2 u nally Man a s in south e R Proceedin g R., Chiku m Evaluatio ck Farmin g s in south e R Proceedin g n D. into r s ystems. T h V . unguicul a d iseases an d n omists and p e, M. P., & e rse Labla b l legumes fo h itbrea an d hem, M. N . 2 007). Yiel d w anda Res e Farming i n t ic Rep u 0 .1111/j.14 an der H o A . (2008). R tems in th e l umbia, p. 1 D ., et Com p a valeur a r s du CERP R D . (2013). A the rabbit a l ty of veteri n a rberry, P. S in sub-Sa h i can highla n M ajee, D., P 2 004). Ev a a ged Rang e e rn Af r ica s No. 115, m ba, N., C n and Scree n g Systems o e rn Africa a g s No. 115, r . The s h e seasons d a and insects. F also a way & Pengelly, fo r sustaina b d B.C. Pen g . , Kanuya, N d potential o arch of Ani m n the battl e u blic of 6 7-7717.20 k , R., B e R ealizing t h e hillsides ère, R. (20 g rostologi U n 14, 2 0 A daptation nd the gui n n ary medic i S ., & Dixo n h aran Afri c n ds, pp. 20-

11 P oshiwa, luation o f e lands in Zi m a
P oshiwa, luation o f e lands in Zi m a nd Austr a (Printed v e C hakoma, I n ing of Fo d o f Wedza D a nd Austra l (Printed v e 23 econd step d idn’t infl u ternatea armers p a to early in v B. C. (200 4 p urpureus le farming g elly, ACIA R N . L., Ntab a o f grass-le g i mal Scienc e e field: the m the C o 11.01257.x navidez, of Central a q ue; Cas d 0 00 Bukav and partici p n ea pig to t h i ne Univer s n , J. (2013) c a In Agr o 35 ., Chigarir o f Herbace o m babwe In a lia, edited e rsion publ i ., Mazaiw a dd er Legu m D istrict In T a lia, edited e rsion publ i J should be u ence in ge n d not adap t a rticipatory ). Assess m G ermplas systems in R Proceedi n a beza, I., G a g ume pastu r e (2), 59 - m eanings o f o ngo. i A ., Humber t of l America raison de c d u pâturag e u , RDC, pp. p atory fora h e South-K i s ity of Lub u . Agricultu r o -ecological , B., Ndl o o us FoddeTropical l e by A.M. W i shed in 20 0 a na, P., M u m es for Sus t T ropical le g by A.M. W i shed in 20 0 J ournal of A to adapt t h n eral t

12 he yi t anywhere s in the in n m ent o
he yi t anywhere s in the in n m ent of the V m in Limpo p southern gs no. 115 a sana, J., U es under di - 61. war, cattl e i sasters, , F. L., U e l ia brasilie n A nnual rep o c ertaines Pilet à e legumi n i vu, R. D. C u mbashi. e intensifi c intensific vu, B., W a r Legume s e gumes for s W hitbread 4 pp. 51-5 7 u kombe, N. , ainable Int e g umes for s W hitbread 4 pp. 58-6 3 A pplied Biot e ISSN 2015, Vol. www.macrot ese forag e i eld produc t C. br a should be n ovations. V ariation in p o Provinc e A frica and A . wimana, fferen man a e and soil i (2), , N . n in sm a o rt Tropic a m éthodes pe r Corroie-le ous in a s y C ongo, Ph. D c ation and t a tion of ag r Wa shayanyik Introduc s ustainable P 7 ) , & Magw e gration in t s ustainable nd B.C. P 3 ). chnology 327-0640 3, No. 1 h in .org/jab s in the t ion. All a siliensis Growth , South A G., … a gement n South 2 33-248. , Mena, a llholder l forage r mettant stem of D . thesis, t he food r iculture , F., & ed into farming farming enge