Charles E Price University of Utah The anomeric effect was discovered in 1955 with the work of JT Edward NJ Chu and RU Lemieux Edwards observed axial preference Edward notice ID: 920957
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The Anomeric Effect Cody F. Bender" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
The Anomeric Effect
Cody F. BenderCharles E. PriceUniversity of Utah
Slide2The anomeric effect
was discovered
in
1955 with the work of J.T. Edward, N.-J. Chu, and R.U. Lemieux.
Edward’s
observed axial preference
Edward notice alkoxypyranose rings favored axial positioning, which contradicted previous notions1He was the first to state lone pairs affected conformation by suggesting the cyclic oxygen’s lone pairs interacted with substituents1
Discovery of the Anomeric Effect
1
Edward, J.T. Chem. Ind. (London)
1955
, 1102.
2
Lemieux, R.U.
Explorations with Sugars-How Sweet It Was,
In
Profiles, Pathways, and Dreams,
Seeman
, J.I., Ed.; American Chemical Society: Washington D.C.,
1990.
3
Lemieux, R.U.; Chu, P.
Abstracts of Papers
; 133
rd
National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, San Francisco, CA.; American Chemical Society: Washington D.C.,
1958
; 31N.
Slide3Discovery of
the Anomeric Effect
1
Edward, J.T. Chem. Ind. (London)
1955
, 1102.2Lemieux, R.U.
Explorations with Sugars-How Sweet It Was, In Profiles, Pathways, and Dreams, Seeman, J.I., Ed.; American Chemical Society: Washington D.C., 1990.3Lemieux, R.U.; Chu, P. Abstracts of Papers; 133rd National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, San Francisco, CA.; American Chemical Society: Washington D.C., 1958
; 31N.
Chu
and Lemieux’s acetylated
aldohexopyranose
results
Chu and Lemieux noticed a similar effect while observing equilibrium of acetylated
aldohexopyranose rings2The measured energy difference of α- and β-pyranose rings to be 0.94 kcal/mol, favoring the α-conformer (Figure 3)2It was also measured that the free energy difference was 1.48 kcal/mol for α-xylose2.
The term anomeric effect was first coined at an ACS meeting in 1958 due to the frequent occurrence of this phenomenon on the anomeric carbon of sugar molecules
3
Slide4The Anomeric Effect Defined
The
anomeric
effect describes the tendency for electronegative substituents
geminally
bound to other heteroatoms within a cyclohexyl
system to prefer the axial position. HyperconjugationHyperconjugation is believed to be the prominent factor for the anomeric effect4Shown is where
the cyclic heteroatom’s lone pairs donate electron density to the σ* oribtal of
the
adjacent carbon-substituent bond, known as a
σ
*-π
interaction4
Due to orbital alignment, this interaction is not possible with equatorial subsitution4π-σ* interaction 4Cuevas, E.; Juaristi, G. (1995). The Anomeric
Effect.
Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Slide5The Anomeric Effect Defined
The
anomeric
effect describes the tendency for electronegative substituents
geminally
bound to other heteroatoms within a cyclohexyl
system to prefer the axial position. 4Cuevas, E.; Juaristi, G. (1995). The Anomeric Effect. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Dipole
minimization
Dipole Minimization
Another
contributing argument is the result of a reduced dipole of the molecule due to lone pair orientation
4
(Figure 5)
Slide6Overcoming the
Anomeric
Effect
Since the
anomeric
effect only gives a benefit of 1-2 kcal/
mol, it can easily be overcome by solvent and in synthesis. Solventε% Axial
CCl42.2
83
C
6
H
6
2.382CS22.680CHCl34.771
CH
3
COCH
3
20.7
72
CH
3
OH
32.6
69
CH
3
CN
37.5
68H2O78.552
Solvent EffectsSince equatorial conformers give larger dipoles, solvents with larger dielectric constants, or polarity, can aid in overcoming the anomeric effect5The table shows this trend using 2-methoxytetrahydropyran in various solvents
Solvent effects on axial preference
5
Lemieux, R.U.; Pavia, A.A.; Martin, J.C.; Watanabe, K.A. Can. J. Chem.
1969
, 47,4427.
6
Koenigs, W.; Knorr, E. Eur. J.
Inorg
. Chem.
1901
, 34, 957.
Slide7Overcoming the
Anomeric
Effect
Since the
anomeric
effect only gives a benefit of 1-2 kcal/
mol, it can easily be overcome by solvent and in synthesis. 5Lemieux, R.U.; Pavia, A.A.; Martin, J.C.; Watanabe, K.A. Can. J. Chem. 1969, 47,4427.6Koenigs, W.; Knorr, E. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 1901
, 34, 957.
Koenigs
-Knorr
Reaction
5
Anti-
Anomeric SynthesisVarious reactions have been developed to produce products that evade the anomeric effect due to low relative energetic benefits, coming from high energy contributions of sterics in the case of a ring flip.6
Slide8Example of the
Anomeric
Effect in
Avermectin
1b
The avermectins
are a class of 16-membered macrocyclic lactones with anthelmintic and insecticidal properties. They are natural products that can be isolated from the bacteria Streptomyces avermitilis.7,8 William C. Campbell and Satoshi Omura were awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 2015 for these molecules’ discovery. The
avermectins show three different examples of the anomeric effect, highlighted in
red
. Two occur in the disaccharide moiety and the third occurs in the
spiroketal
structure, in which the
anomeric effect is not entirely observed. The external ring of the spiroketal
follows the anomeric effect as a substituent. But, the isopropyl group on this ring disrupts the ability for the internal ring to occupy the axial position.9 7Omura, S.; Shiomi, K. Pure and App. Chem. 2007. 79. 581.8Pitterna, T. et al. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2009
. 17. 4085.
9
Springer, J.;
Arison
, B.;
Hirshfield
, J.;
Hoogsteen
, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1981
. 103. 4221.
Structure
of
avermectin
1b3
Slide9Practice Problems
1) Predict the
K
eq
for the following equilibrium.
2) What is the preferred position of the
allyl substituted anomeric carbon on this tri-methoxybenzylpyranose ring?
3) What is the position of the vinyl group in the product of the given reaction?
K
eq
> 1
K
eq
= 1Keq < 1AxialEquatorialNo preferenceRacemicAxialEquatorial
10
Shuto, S.
Angew
. Chem. Int. Ed.
2003
. 42. 1021-1023.
11
Aponick, A. Chem. Eur. J.
2013
. 19. 11613-11621.
Solutions: 1) C, 2) A, 3) B
Slide10Contributed by:
Cody F.
Bender, Charles
E.
Price (Undergraduates)
University of Utah, 2016