/
Biometrics – Fingerprints Biometrics – Fingerprints

Biometrics – Fingerprints - PowerPoint Presentation

faustina-dinatale
faustina-dinatale . @faustina-dinatale
Follow
423 views
Uploaded On 2016-04-19

Biometrics – Fingerprints - PPT Presentation

Brent Kennedy Agenda Overview Security Issues Usability Issues Bring it all together Discussion What is a fingerprint Sequence of ridges and valleys No two fingerprints can be exactly the same ID: 283815

cont fingerprint issues spoofing fingerprint cont spoofing issues usability http height fingerprints device print play cast soft biometric press

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Biometrics – Fingerprints" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Biometrics – Fingerprints

Brent Kennedy Slide2

Agenda

Overview

Security Issues

Usability Issues

Bring it all

together

DiscussionSlide3

What is a fingerprint?

Sequence of ridges and valleys

No two fingerprints can be exactly the same

Even two imprints from the same finger are different

Reliable and efficient biometric

Still are consScanners work by imaging the print and using an algorithm to compare images

http://denis.biometric-fingerprint.com/?cat=7

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FingerprintSlide4

Security Issues

Storage

How are the fingerprints stored?

Who can access them?

Privacy

Can fingerprints lead to more information?DeviceIs it susceptible to over the shoulder peeks?

Does it leave a trace?

Can it be spoofed?Slide5

>Slide6

Fingerprint Spoofing

Small experiment done at W&J College

January 2006

Aimed to spoof fingerprints using common household items

Total Cost: $12.82

Cast:

Play-

Doh

Gummy bears

Model Magic

Silly Putty

Modeling clay

Tac

N’ StikMold:Paraffin wax

http://www.washjeff.edu/users/ahollandminkley/Biometric/index.htmlSlide7

Fingerprint Spoofing (Cont.)

Devices

Microsoft Fingerprint Reader

APC Biometric Security deviceSlide8

Fingerprint Spoofing (Cont.)

What failed…

One-step method of taking a print directly from the source (no cast)

Gummy bears: Myth busted!

Wouldn’t even hold a fingerprint

Tac N’ Stik worked too well

Picked up old prints from the scanner

Silly putty stuck to the device

Play-

Doh

was too soft to withstand pressureSlide9

Fingerprint Spoofing (Cont.)

Success!

Very soft piece of wax flattened against hard surface

Press the finger to be molded for 5 minutes

Transfer wax to freezer for 10-15 minutes

Firmly press modeling material into castPress against the fingerprint readerReplicated several timesSlide10

Fingerprint Spoofing (Cont.)Slide11

Fingerprint Spoofing (Cont.)

Modified approach on the APC device

Requires less pressure so Play-

Doh

can be used

Form the Play-Doh around the scanner surfaceThen place the flat surface in the cast

More patience required to get authorized

After time, the mold becomes too soft to useSlide12

Fingerprint Spoofing (Cont.)

Caveats

Molding material becomes firm and brittle quickly

Hard to make a cast ahead of time

Very high quality mold is required

Attacker may need more advanced materialsAll molds were of the thumbSmaller prints may cause additional problemsSlide13

Usability Issues

The main usability factors for fingerprints:

Scanner height/angle

Training conditions

Age

HabituationSupervisionSlide14

Usability Issues (Cont.)

Height/Angle

Efficiency (time) not significantly affected by height or angle

Quality significantly affected by height but not angle

Still hard to determine optimal height

Overall satisfaction affected by height, angle, and user height

http://zing.ncsl.nist.gov/biousa/docs/NISTIR-7504%20height%20angle.pdfSlide15

Usability Issues (Cont.)

Age

18-25 age range gave consistent good prints

Prints get worse as age increases

Men overall better than women

HabituationNo trend to print quality over timeUsers didn’t know how to fix bad prints

http://zing.ncsl.nist.gov/biousa/docs/WP302_Theofanos.pdfSlide16

Usability Issues (Cont.)

Training/Supervision

Poster had worst success rate: 56%

Verbal vs. video instruction had equal success

Assistance significantly increased success rate

78% without assistance98% with assistance

http://zing.ncsl.nist.gov/biousa/docs/NISTIR-7403-Ten-Print-Study-03052007.pdfSlide17

Bringing it all together…

Can better usability solve the spoofing problem?

It can help

Smaller scanning area

Slap vs. roll

Better algorithms with better feedbackSlide18

Questions?