continued The fracturing of form To review previous claim Inchbald solves the most serious plot problemthe threat of incest and sacrilegethrough a comic move Dorriforth is released from his religious vows so that he can inherit the title and estate ID: 512566
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Inchbald" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Inchbald continued
The fracturing of formSlide2
To review previous claim
Inchbald
solves the most serious plot problem—the threat of incest and sacrilege—through a comic
move
:
Dorriforth
is
released from his religious vows so that he can inherit the title and estate.
Suddenly, marriage and the production of an heir are not only not disallowed but required
.
Inchbald
accommodates
desire
while making it serve
the
community (i.e., through marriage, produce heirs.
Miss Woodley:
“’I no longer condemn, but congratulate you on your passion; and will assist you with all my advice and earnest wishes, that you may obtain a return’”
(
102, 142)
.Slide3
In other words . . .
The way in which
Miss Milner
is most
out of bounds
is resolved through the conventions of comedy.
In this trajectory, the union of Miss Milner and
Dorriforth
/Lord Elmwood seems to be the aim of the fiction.
What do you think?Slide4
Most of Miss Milner’s other problems
her apparent attraction to a young rake,
her
changeability
—
arise
from her effort to conceal her desire for
Dorriforth
/Lord Elmwood.
Desire is the problem. But solved by comic form, it is sufficiently constrained to be satisfied.
REMAINING PROBLEM: To establish her powerSlide5
In comic plots,
Sandford
.
. .
Sandford
, who is cruel and verbally abusive to Miss Milner, ought to be punished by the same comic form that resolves the conflict of desire.
He
is a vicious critic let loose in the parlor. The form should protect Miss Milner from
him.
One contemporary reader characterizes him as “severe in his morals, unaccommodating in his manners, a harsh satirist, proud, turbulent, and acrimonious.”
(See appendix, 377)
Satirist
:
Inchbald
has incorporated a satirist in her comic romance. He points out with particular severity what Miss Milner’s failures are, and he is in continual tension with the otherwise comic patterning of the novel. Slide6
In comic plots, Sandford
. .
. (2)
In the comic romance,
Sandford
would be merely an authoritarian blocking figure, repressing the energy, liveliness and generosity of Miss Milner,
Lord Elmwood to Miss Woodley; “
’For God’s sake take care what you are doing—you are destroying my prospects of futurity—you are making this world too dear to me’”
(
130, 166)
a
romance commonplace and a sacrilege, a transferring of the power of adoration and devotion from religious to secular life
.
Sandford
must undergo a character change when
Inchbald’s
fictional purposes for him change.Slide7
The formal, and generic, problem
arises because
Inchbald’s
comic vision is in tension with other movements in the novel and with problems that comic form cannot resolve.
scene by scene
, Miss Milner is far more frequently the one readers want to emerge rewarded, as is clear from the evidence of contemporary readers (see appendices).Slide8
Anna Laetitia
Barbauld
, The British Novelists
“The
character of the ward of
Dorriforth
is so drawn as to excite an interest such as we seldom feel
for more
faultless characters.
Young
, sprightly, full of sensibility, gay and thoughtless, we feel such a tenderness for her as we should for a child who is playing on the brink of a
precipice”
(370).Slide9
This treatment of comic form is a little peculiar
---given
Inchbald’s
successful career as a dramatist. She had already shown just how much she thought comic form could accommodate. In
I’ll Tell You What
, --------
-
Inchbald
levels distinctions within the community
by
the claim that “we are all related.”
Even
marital ties disturbed by putative adultery and actual divorce are not enough to destroy the bonds of the related community. In
A Simple Story,
on the other hand
,
the disturbance of marital ties is a disturbance to fictional form.Slide10
Miss Milner’s gender-based pride
“
Within a few days, in the house of Lord Elmwood every thing, and every person wore a new face
” (136, 171).
“Her heart whispered . . . ‘my power over him might have been greater still . . .’”(137, 172))
An odd narrative voice: “Unthinking woman! . . . But what female is not fond of experiments?” (139).
Miss Milner is now the proud, killing beauty.Slide11
The scene: “You are unjust, sir, in saying so before the
trial
”
(142, 175)
“domestic wrangles—a family without subordination—a house without economy—in a word, a wife without discretion, had been perpetually present to his mind” (142, 176)
Narrator’s special pleading for
Sandford
(followed by Lord Elmwood’s appropriate judgment: “”’Cruel, barbarous man.’” (143, 177)
The trial of Miss Milner: law
vs
forgivenessSlide12
Quick series of plot turns
“Then he is not to be my husband after all” (163, 194)
Lord Elmwood “was moved, but ashamed of being so”((164)
I’ll make the trial . . . (166)
“to make trial of a contrary method” (
167)
She is waiting for submission (173)Slide13
Rapidity of development: what does it make you expect?
Lord Elmwood declares he will leave her forever
And she complies with his request
. (175-77)
“The severest judge could not have arraigned her conduct from the day she received Lord Elmwood’s letter to the day of his departure” (177)
She “beheld her doom” (179).
Sandford
begins to play a different role (184).
BUT THE WEDDING RING IS A MOURNING RING.Slide14
Survival vs
learning a lesson
“Young
, full of sensibility, gay and
thoughtless”: Miss Milner’s spirit, her desire not to be dominated, are necessary
for her survival in this fiction but counter productive as an example for fiction
readers.
Miss Milner could be seen as a negative example (as Roxana often suggests she is), but the delineation of a negative example can run counter to the creation of a believable character.Slide15
Part II (vol
III)
Lady
Elmwood’s story of adultery cannot be told,
c
annot be contained in a comic
narrative.
Miss Milner’s flaws are supposed to be corrected in the next generation: in the compliance of her daughter, Matilda.
But no
educational treatise would recommend the isolation from paternal care to which
Matilda
is subjected.
And Matilda’s complete submissiveness may work for instructional purposes but doesn’t constitute a persuasive fiction.Slide16
Changing genre
The second part of the novel is more like a Gothic fiction than a comic romance.
Lord Elmwood is a
tyrannic
father
Matilda a compliant daughter
Matilda’s response to her
father is awe
and terror
.