PPT-ITC and Trademark Infringement Cases

By Benita Collier Section 337 Litigation before ITC International Trade Commission Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 19 USC 1337 declares unlawful certain unfair practices in import trade including infringement of intellectual property rights With respect to intellectual property Section 337 prohibits the importation into the United States the sale of importation or the sale within the United States after importation of articles that infringe a valid and enforceable US patent copyright trademark or mask work. Media for Businesses. #. awesomelegalpresentation. Tony Zana. March 11, 2014. Legal Disclaimers. Thes. e. . material. s. . hav. e. . bee. n. . prepared. . solely fo. r. educationa. l. . purpose. . 2014. Seattle IP Inn of Court – Group 4. Agenda. Introduction. Shannon Jost. Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.. Shannon Jost. Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd v. CLS Bank Int’l. Tim Seeley. Highmark, Inc. v. AllCare . Neha. . Kapoor
Sarah. . Weingarten
Daymanuel. . Sampson
Christina. Miller . What is Copyright Infringement?. unauthorized or prohibited use of works covered . by a copyright law. often refers to production/acquisition of any illegal derivative of the work. By: Victoria Kinney. What is a trademark?. Word. Symbol . Design. Combination of these that a business uses to identify itself or something it sells. What can be protected through a trademark: . A word, group of words, phrase, or text. Lanham Act of 1946:. The primary federal trademark law that prohibits trademark infringement, dilution, false advertising, and in turn disparaging trademarks. The law requires. that any trademark. that may disparage any  persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, bring them into contempt or disrepute.. Brands and Fakes. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. Intellectual property (IP) refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions; literary and artistic works; designs; and symbols, names and images used in commerce.. Canadian Trademarks . Amendments and their Effect on U.S. Trademark Owners. ABA – Spring Conference, March 2015. Presented by: John McKeown. Cynthia . Rowden. . 1. Chronology of TM Changes. March 2013 – . Why Courts Should Hesitate Before . Deferring to USPTO Decisions. Deborah R. Gerhardt. Associate Professor, UNC School of Law . How much deference should judges give to USPTO trademark decisions, practices, and policies? . New Product Introduction. August 25, 2011. Terrence J. McAllister. Discussion Points. Common terms . - definitions. Trademark Clearance- . what should be done and when. Trademark Registration . process- steps to take to gain additional legal advantages. BU Law Entrepreneurship & IP Clinic. Distinguishing Types of IP. Patent: way to protect your inventions (ex. light bulb). Copyright: way to protect your creative expressions that are fixed in a tangible medium (ex. painting). U NITED S TATES P ATENT AND T RADEMARK O FFICE P.O. Box 1451 Alexandria, VA 22313 - 1451 General Contact Number: 571 - 272 - 8500 General Email: TTABInfo@uspto.gov November 22, 2019 Proceeding N U NITED S TATES P ATENT AND T RADEMARK O FFICE P.O. Box 1451 Alexandria, VA 22313 - 1451 General Contact Number: 571 - 272 - 8500 General Email: TTABInfo@uspto.gov July 1, 2019 Proceeding No. 9 Richard Edwards. , James . Stanley, Maddie White, . Andrew Waa, Susan C . Kaai. , Anne C K Quah, Geoffrey T Fong. ITC New Zealand Project. NZ Team. Richard Edwards . 1. Anaru. Waa . 1. James Stanley . by . CA. Kapil Aggarwal &. CA. Vijay Narayan. 1. Topics covered:. Input Tax Credit –basic provisions. Eligibility and conditions – Sec-16. Apportionment of credit – 17 (1) to (4). Blocked Credit – Sec 17 (5).