/
Science from Surveys Science from Surveys

Science from Surveys - PowerPoint Presentation

giovanna-bartolotta
giovanna-bartolotta . @giovanna-bartolotta
Follow
378 views
Uploaded On 2017-04-20

Science from Surveys - PPT Presentation

Jim Condon NRAO Charlottesville Why make radio surveys Detect most sources in fluxlimited populations Discover detect and recognize new source types and phenomena Characterize source populations ID: 539766

2016 science iii frequencies science 2016 frequencies iii dec pulsars survey source nvss tgss ghz radio spectral spectrum psrs errors star agns

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Science from Surveys" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Science from Surveys

Jim Condon

NRAO, CharlottesvilleSlide2

Why make radio surveys?Detect most sources in flux-limited populationsDiscover (detect and recognize) new source types and

phenomenaCharacterize source populations: Multiwavelength cross-identifications, redshifts, SEDs

Classify (AGNs, star-forming galaxies, cluster relics, pulsars, …) Radio spectrum, polarization, angular size, variability, transients, … Statistical properties (luminosity functions, size distributions,

evolution of AGNs and star formation, ...

Statistical cosmology: BAOs, weak lensing, EORStudy foregrounds (Galactic magnetic fields, cluster magnetic fields)Remove foregrounds (from EOR, CMB)Produce reference sky images and catalogs for others to use

Science at Low Frequencies III. 2016 Dec 7

2Slide3

The universe isnot empty

Most sourcesare extragalacticScience at Low Frequencies III. 2016 Dec 73

GalacticcenterSlide4

Science at Low Frequencies III. 2016 Dec 74

… very extragalactic Slide5

AGNs and star-forming galaxiesScience at Low Frequencies III. 2016 Dec 75

AGN

Star-forming galaxiesSlide6

Source counts and angular sizes?Science at Low Frequencies III. 2016 Dec 76Slide7

Science at Low Frequencies III. 2016 Dec 7

7Slide8

Science at Low Frequencies III. 2016 Dec 7

8Slide9

Science at Low Frequencies III. 2016 Dec 7

9Slide10

Easy Problems vs Hard ProblemsDetect 79 known pulsars with S > 2.5 mJy at 1.4 GHz in the NVSS (Kaplan et al. 1998, ApJS, 119, 75)

easyLocate the LMXB pulsar PSR J1123+0038 because it is bistable easy Discover all pulsars or stars with S > 2.5 mJy at 1.4 GHz in the NVSS hard

Science at Low Frequencies III. 2016 Dec 710Slide11

Survey frequency: How much does it matter scientifically? Science at Low Frequencies III. 2016 Dec 711

4CSlide12

Measuring and using spectral indicesScience at Low Frequencies III. 2016 Dec 7

12GLEAM internal

VLSSr / NVSSSlide13

Finding Known and Unknown Pulsars using TGSS/NVSS spectraAn image-based approach used in the past to find pulsars (e.g. B1937+21)Method selects without regard to period, dispersion measure, orbital parameters and interstellar scattering

Measure compactness, spectrum, polarization, and positionPromising candidates searched for pulsations in gamma-rays and/or radioHope is to find exotic PSRs missed by traditional pulsation search methods

TGSS-NVSS Spectral Index Image0.3% AGNα<-1.5

62% PSRs

α<-1.5Slide14

Summary:The universe is not a vacuum. Survey parameters (resolution, sensitivity, dynamic range, position accuracy, sky coverage, …) should be matched to source properties (surface brightness, redshift range, angular size, spectral index, sky density, confusion, optical/IR IDs

,…).Discovery = detection + recognitionSurvey frequency is not a strong spectral selector.Low- and high-frequency surveys complement each other.The

faster the survey speed, the sooner the survey hits the wall of systematic errors (confusion, dynamic range, primary beam errors, clean bias, ionospheric phase errors, …). Systematic errors dominate

,

especially at low frequencies, so

quality is needed to exploit quantity (be sure to get ground truth on clean bias, ionospheric calibration source suppression, …)Survey science = survey quality X number of scientists who use it

Science at Low Frequencies III. 2016 Dec 7

14Slide15

15

Science at Low Frequencies III. 2016 Dec 7

The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation

operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.

www.nrao.edu • science.nrao.eduSlide16

Science at Low Frequencies III. 2016 Dec 716

TGSS = black stars7C = blue and green dotsDeep fields = red, black, yellow, magenta, grey dots Slide17

Science at Low Frequencies III. 2016 Dec 7

17Slide18

Science at Low Frequencies III. 2016 Dec 7

18

Data points and box: 160

μ

m

Herschel counts converted to

1.4 GHz by the FIR/radio ratio

q = log(S

160

μ

m

)/log(S

1.4 GHz

) = 2.5

96% of the radio source

background is resolved by

S

1.4 GHz

~ 1.7

μJySlide19

Science at Low Frequencies III. 2016 Dec 7

19Slide20

‘‘Classical’’ confusionScience at Low Frequencies III. 2016 Dec 7

20Slide21

The Case of the Steep Spectrum Pulsars

TGSS sample is biased toward steeper spectral indices (as expected)

S

teep spectrum PSRs are gamma-ray emitting MSPs (i.e.

MSPs and normal pulsars show no such tends in larger samples

What is going on here? Frail et al (2016)

All PSRs

TGSS PSRs