/
Anatomy of  an Appeal Anatomy of  an Appeal

Anatomy of an Appeal - PowerPoint Presentation

jane-oiler
jane-oiler . @jane-oiler
Follow
346 views
Uploaded On 2019-11-19

Anatomy of an Appeal - PPT Presentation

Anatomy of an Appeal Michelle A Barrett JD RN mianbarrettyahoocom April 13 2019 Learning Objectives B egin to understand the procedural flow of denials and appeals Navigate the nuances of various ID: 765676

clinical appeal review payers appeal clinical payers review map appeals sepsis diagnosis www peer https rac denial amp processes

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Anatomy of an Appeal" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Anatomy of an Appeal Michelle A. Barrett, JD, RNmianbarrett@yahoo.comApril 13, 2019

Learning Objectives Begin to understand the procedural flow of denials and appeals Navigate the nuances of various payers Understand medical record review for appeal writing Learn primary elements of written appeal

Disclosure Note: This lecture is Michelle Barrett’s personal opinion and may not reflect the opinion of Mayo Clinic or ACDIS.

Types of appeals Medical Necessity Inpatient medical necessityClinical Validation

Where the appeal starts Inpatient Hospital Admission & Discharge Coding & Billing Payment Received

The request Request for Records Records SentResults Review or Denial Letter Received

Payers & Reviewers The Various Payers & ReviewersRecovery Audit Contractor (RAC) (Medicare)Medicare Advantage Plan (MAP) UnitedHealthcare Humana Aetna Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield

Contracted Reviews for MAP CotivitiEquiClaim OmniClaim MedReview Payers & Reviewers

The RAC appeal process 30 day discussion period (optional) 1. Redetermination by the Fiscal Intermediary 2 . Reconsideration by a Qualified Independent Contractor 3 . Administrative Law Judge Hearing 4 . Medicare Appeals Council Review 5 . Judicial Review in U.S. District Court A Primer on RAC Appeals – McGuireWoods - https://www.mcguirewoods.com/news-resources/publications/health_care/Primer%20on%20RAC%20Appeals.pdf

The RAC appeal process Level of Appeal Days a Provider Has to File Days Until Issuance of Decision Redetermination by the Fiscal Intermediary 120 60 Reconsideration by a Qualified Independent Contractor 180 60 Administrative Law Judge Hearing 60 90 Medicare Appeals Council Review 60 90 Judicial Review in U.S. District Court 60 -- A Primer on RAC Appeals – McGuireWoods - https://www.mcguirewoods.com/news-resources/publications/health_care/Primer%20on%20RAC%20Appeals.pdf

The RAC appeal process Extensions: Acceptable – Illness of Key Staff Act of Nature Delay in Results Unacceptable – Internal Administrative Delays

Map - payers appeal processes Contracted-Follow ContractversusNon-Contracted

Map - payers appeal processes – Pre-recoupment MAP ContractorVarious T ime Frames30, 45, 60 or 180 Days Contained in Results Letter Request Peer to Peer at Earliest Available Time

Map - payers appeal processes – Post- recoupment Appeal Directly to the PayerAppeal Rights Explanation of Benefits Remittance Advise

Map - payers appeal processes - Unitedhealthcare CotivitiLevel 1 Appeal Peer to Peer ConversationAppeal to UnitedHealthcare Directly Level 1 AppealPeer to Peer Conversation

Map - payers appeal processes – Humana Appeal to Humana DirectlyThree Levels of Appeal Peer to Peer Conversation

Target diagnoses Sepsis Encephalopathy Acute respiratory failure – hypoxic or h ypercapneicMalnutrition AKI w/ or w/o ATN NSTEMI or Type II MI

Clinical validation Sepsis Sepsis 2 vs Sepsis 3Per the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting, “Adherence to these guidelines when assigning ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes is required under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA). The diagnosis codes (Tabular List and Alphabetic Index) have been adopted under HIPPA for all healthcare settings.” See 45 Code of Federal Regulations (Subpart J) Section 162.1002

Sepsis 2 resources https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385979/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784683 / https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27649072 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29404582 https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29289687

Clinical validation Malnutrition OIG target – severe malnutrition, marasmus, and kwashiokor Diagnosis consistently documented Supporting clinical data Treatment plan

Clinical validation Resources for DiagnosesUpToDate ACP Hospitalist

For all appeals Thoroughly review the denial letterDetermine what has been denied and the reason for the denialAddress directly the issue being denied, citing references that rebut their position

Review all medical records EMR and written documents Compare with the records submitted and ensure everything was submittedEnsure that you have a legible copy of everything submitted to review

DRILL DOWN THE DENIAL Look at the denial letter to determine specifically why the reviewer determined that the diagnosis is not clinically supported. Examples include:NSTEMI-no EKG changes, not diagnosed by a cardiologist etc. Sepsis – no evidence of organ dysfunctionPneumonia – negative CXR

DRILL DOWN THE DENIAL According to the 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (available late August, 2018), NSTEMI only requires a troponin rise and/or fall at the 99th URL with clinical evidence of unstable angina, an angina equivalent OR typical EKG changes May be caused by a supply demand mismatch such as respiratory failure or atrial fib with RVR) requiring treatment for what caused the mismatch Does not need to be diagnosed by a cardiologist Hospitalists are licensed providers

DRILL DOWN THE DENIAL Sepsis Many organizations have not adopted the sepsis 3 definitionThere is now some question about the validity of the definition

Writing the appeal Always use the patient’s namePersonalize the patient Begin with stating the desired result Then state the facts surrounding the admission, including all clinical data that supports your position Vital signs, lab values, physical exam, documentation of the condition, etc., emphasizing where the documentation is found

Writing the appeal Include any dispositive facts and explain why those facts do not negate the diagnosis, if possibleThe findings of the reviewerWhy those findings are not correct, inapplicable to the fact situation, not the correct clinical definition of the diagnosis in question

Writing the appeal Apply your clinical definition to the facts and demonstrate why that is supported ie the NSTEMI was in fact diagnosed by the cardiologist and where the documentation is containedCite authoritative sources If multiple diagnoses are challenged, address each one separately and argue why it is in fact clinically supported

Writing the appeal Finish with a statement that the hospital was correct in how it coded the case, “ statused” the patient, etc. and thus the payment was correct

Future use of clinical validation info Consider using the definitions from appeals supporting clinical diagnoses as the basis for clarifications.

CDI Tips Ensure physical exam is consistent with diagnosis EncephalopathySepsis Severe malnutrition Ensure consistent documentation Including discharge summary

Thank you & Questions Questions?

Anatomy of an AppealMichelle A. Barrett, JD, RN mianbarrett@yahoo.com317-512-4067 April 13, 2019