and Legal Ethics. Ethics Discussion Panel. Panelists: Professor Lisa Kern Griffin (UNC); Professor Joseph . Grundfest. (Stanford); Melinda Haag (Orrick). 1 hour Ethics MCLE. Duty of Prosecutors. Prosecutors have a special status as a minister of justice and, therefore, a special duty: . ID: 715939
DownloadNote - The PPT/PDF document "Billions: Money, Financial Crime," is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Billions:Money, Financial Crime, and Legal Ethics
Ethics Discussion PanelPanelists: Professor Lisa Kern Griffin (UNC); Professor Joseph Grundfest (Stanford); Melinda Haag (Orrick)1 hour Ethics MCLESlide2
Duty of ProsecutorsProsecutors have a special status as a minister of justice and, therefore, a special duty: to seek justice.“An inscription on the walls of the Department of Justice states the proposition candidly for the federal domain: "The United States wins its point whenever justice is done its citizens in the courts."
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963)Slide3
ABA Model Rule 3.8: Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor (a) – The prosecutor in a criminal case shall refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable causeComment: A prosecutor has the responsibility of a minister of justice and not simply that of an advocate. This responsibility carries with it specific obligations to see that the defendant is accorded procedural justice, that guilt is decided upon the basis of sufficient evidence, and that special precautions are taken to prevent and to rectify the conviction of innocent persons.Slide4
US Attorneys’ Manual, Title 9, Section 27 – Principles of Federal Prosecution (https://www.justice.gov/usam/usam-9-27000-principles-federal-prosecution#9-27.001)“promote the reasoned exercise of prosecutorial authority and contribute to the fair, evenhanded administration of the Federal criminal laws.”“A determination to prosecute represents a policy judgment that the fundamental interests of society require the application of the criminal laws to a particular set of circumstances—recognizing both that serious violations of Federal law must be prosecuted, and that prosecution entails profound consequences for the accused and the family of the accused whether or not a conviction ultimately results.”Slide5
Billions gives us a fictionalized story highlighting the many ways this prosecutorial ideal can be undermined.Minister of Justice
Flipping witnesses /informants
Conflict of Interest
Real World Examples(we acknowledge there is room to argue about the merits of these cases)DOJ Public Integrity Section prosecution of Ted StevensMultiple examples of misconduct including Brady violations Prosecution vacated at the instruction of Eric HolderProsecution of Duke lacrosse playersOne of the few cases resulting a criminal contempt conviction of the prosecutor
Prosecution of Aaron Schwartz9th Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski has recently complained of an epidemic of prosecutorial misconduct (http://www.latimes.com/local/politics/la-me-lying-prosecutors-20150201-story.html)Slide7
Initiating ProsecutionChuck Rhoades: “I think long and hard before any prosecution in my office goes forward. And I'm proudest of the cases I choose not to prosecute. But when I go forward, it's full guns.”
U.S. Attorneys Manual, Title 9, 27.200-260Once a U.S. Attorney has probable cause to believe a person has committed a federal offense within her/his jurisdiction, she/he has several factors to consider before deciding to initiate or decline to initiate a prosecutionInitiation of prosecution is normally expected as long as probable cause exists and the attorney believes that evidence sufficient to sustain a conviction will be available and admissible at trial.Factors that may go to declining to prosecute:
No substantial Federal interest would be served by prosecution;
The person is subject to effective prosecution in another jurisdiction; or
There exists an adequate non-criminal alternative to prosecution.
(It is impermissible to consider the possible effect of the decision on the U.S. Attorney’s own professional or personal position.)Slide8
Plea AgreementsU.S. Attorney Manual 9-27.420 - Plea Agreements—Considerations to be WeighedIn determining whether it would be appropriate to enter into a plea agreement, the attorney for the government should weigh all relevant considerations, including:
The defendant's willingness to cooperate in the investigation or prosecution of others;The defendant's history with respect to criminal activity;The nature and seriousness of the offense or offenses charged;The defendant's remorse or contrition and his/her willingness to assume responsibility for his/her conduct;The desirability of prompt and certain disposition of the case;The likelihood of obtaining a conviction at trial;The probable effect on witnesses;The probable sentence or other consequences if the defendant is convicted;The public interest in having the case tried rather than disposed of by a guilty plea;
The expense of trial and appeal;
The need to avoid delay in the disposition of other pending cases; and
The effect upon the victim's right to restitution.
Axelrod’s Lawyer: I
sensed a possible waffle on the specifics of the
did commit to a no guilty plea but said he would have to reconfirm with Rhoades.
could they come with?
worst, the company will have to plead guilty to conspiracy.
is the same.
Axe: An admission of guilt? If they put that in front of me tomorrow, I don't think I can sign it.Slide9
Non-prosecution / Deferred prosecutionNon-prosecution / Deferred prosecution agreements (NPA/DPA) have emerged as a major tool in addressing corporate wrongdoing.
“Prior to 2003, almost no cases were resolved through NPAs or DPAs. Beginning in 2003, however, the number of NPAs and DPAs begins to grow substantially, although the number fluctuates. From 2006–2011, 42 percent of cases were resolved with NPAs and DPAs, and in some years the combined number of NPAs and DPAs surpassed the number of pleas. […] The introduction of NPAs and DPAs has not been accompanied by a decline in the use of plea agreements. To the contrary, increased use of plea agreements has accompanied the rise of NPAs and DPAs, and thus an overall increase in the reach of corporate criminal enforcement.Reform Mandates. NPAs and DPAs have tended to include more provisions that waive or alter the traditional legal entitlements of corporations and more conditions relating to the corporation’s governance structure when compared with plea agreements. In each time period studied, NPAs and DPAs have consistently contained larger numbers of both legal process and governance reform provisions than plea agreements.(Searle Civil Justice Institute, Trends in the Use of Non-prosecution, Deferred Prosecution, and Plea Agreements in the Settlement of Alleged Corporate Wrongdoing, Executive Summary (April 2015), available at http://masonlec.org/site/rte_uploads/files/SCJI/Executive%20Summary%20-%20SCJI%20NPA%20DPA%20Report.pdf.)
U.S. Attorney Manual
- Entering into Non-prosecution Agreements in Return for Cooperation—Considerations to be Weighed
In determining whether, a person's cooperation may be necessary to the public interest, the attorney for the government, and those whose approval is necessary, should weigh all relevant considerations, including:
The importance of the investigation or prosecution to an effective program of law enforcement;
The value of the person's cooperation to the investigation or prosecution; and
The person's relative culpability in connection with the offense or offenses being investigated or prosecuted and his/her history with respect to criminal activity.Slide10
Conflict of InterestFamilial / Financial:Bryan Connerty: “I don't wanna
be out of line, but you might wanna consider recusing from this case. The conflict of interest... it's gonna be an issue.”Revolving Door:Axe’s Lawyer to Connerty: “The good news is this... when you get out of there, you're starting at $1.4, easy. Better news... I'll hire you.”
ABA Criminal Justice Section, Standard 3-1.3 Conflicts of Interest
– prosecutor should avoid conflicts of interest; should not permit his or her professional judgment or obligations to be affected by his or her own political, financial, business, property, or personal interests.Slide11
Familial / FinancialDOJ regulation that bars participation in a criminal investigation or prosecution if the attorney has a personal or political relationship with a person or organization (1) who is substantially involved in the conduct being investigated or prosecuted, or (2) whom the attorney knows has a specific and substantial interest that would be directly affected by the outcome of the investigation or prosecution. 28 C.F.R. § 45.2(a) (1996).Slide12
Revolving DoorImplicates several ethical duties, in particular loyalty and confidentiality; Also has important appearance issuesABA Model Rule 1.11(a) - "side switching rule“ - prohibits a former government attorney from representing a client in a matter in which the attorney participated in a substantial way for the government, even when the lawyer's subsequent representation would not be adverse to the government.
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia has emphasized that, in examining cases involving former government attorneys accused of "side switching," the court "must be especially careful" for two reasons: First, because government attorneys may have had access to more kinds of information in connection with the prior representations than private attorneys typically do, there is a greater potential for misuse of information – including information that is not necessarily confidential in nature – . . . in the revolving door context. Second, the public is generally more concerned about government improprieties than about private improprieties. Thus, the appearance problem is more severe because the public is likely to be more critical of the potential misuse of information. United States v. Philip Morris, Inc., 312 F. Supp. 2d 27, 38 (D.D.C. 2004) (citing Brown v. D.C. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 486 A.2d 37, 43 (D.C. 1984) (en banc)).(Also implicates Model Rules 1.6 (revealing confidential information) and 1.9 (using confidential information))
Recusal obligations under both the administrative standards of conduct, 5 C.F.R. § 2635.604(a) (2009), which apply to unilateral contacts, and the criminal conflict of interest statute, 18 U.S.C. § 208 (2008), which applies to employment negotiations. An attorney is disqualified from participating in any particular matter that would affect the financial interests of a prospective employer with whom the attorney is seeking employment.Slide13
RecusalsUS Attorneys Manual: 3-2.170 – RecusalsWhen United States Attorneys, or their offices, become aware of an issue that could require a recusal in a criminal or civil matter or case as a result of a personal interest or professional relationship with parties involved in the matter, they must contact General Counsel's Office (GCO), EOUSA. The requirement of recusal does not arise in every instance, but only where a conflict of interest exists or there is an appearance of a conflict of interest or loss of impartiality.
Wendy: Why don't you recuse yourself? Chuck Rhoades: Out of the question. Wendy: Why? Chuck Rhoades: Because I owe it to my team. I owe it to the public. It's my responsibility to prosecute.