/
BLUR : Code and Code How technology is washing away traditional legal boundaries BLUR : Code and Code How technology is washing away traditional legal boundaries

BLUR : Code and Code How technology is washing away traditional legal boundaries - PowerPoint Presentation

jane-oiler
jane-oiler . @jane-oiler
Follow
371 views
Uploaded On 2018-02-27

BLUR : Code and Code How technology is washing away traditional legal boundaries - PPT Presentation

K Krasnow Waterman LawTechIntersect LLC Presented to TTI Vanguard February 20 2014 Impact of Tech on Law 22014 kkwLawTechIntersectcom 2 Automating Preexisting Legal Process 22014 ID: 638419

kkw lawtechintersect code rule lawtechintersect kkw rule code data process subject legal mgl 172 person blur party amp law

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "BLUR : Code and Code How technology is w..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

BLUR

: Code and CodeHow technology is washing away traditional legal boundaries

K. Krasnow Waterman

LawTechIntersect, LLC

Presented to TTI/

Vanguard

February 20, 2014Slide2

Impact of Tech on Law

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

2Slide3

Automating Pre-existing Legal Process

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

3

NOT BLURSlide4

Let’s talk about

BLUR

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

4Slide5

Boundaries that Blur

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

5Slide6

Do you accept Terms of Service on websites?

Substantive Change

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

6Slide7

Have you ever been able to avoid using a lawyer because you could look something up online?

Process Change

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

7Slide8

Do you follow the President on Twitter?

Change in Philosophy

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

8Slide9

EXCEPT his..1986 - except his yard (Fly

-over)2007 – email & web logBut not his.. (warrant required)1967 – wired phone (Pen register)

1999 – keystrokes

2001 – heat signature

2012 – ongoing auto location (

gps

tracking device)

And, not sure about his

2013 – phone metadata

Privacy

“A man’s home is his castle”

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

9

SubstanceSlide10

Genetic Code & Legal Code

Substance

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

10Slide11

Demographics2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com11

SubstanceSlide12

Big Data: Program Code & Code

How do we determine de facto discrimination trends growing in big data?

“Unlike some websites claim, Hoffman is not Jewish since both of his parents have no Jewish background and he was not raised

Jewish.”

Process

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

12Slide13

AngelList: 423 Legal Market Entities

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

13Slide14

Case Law as Graph$8.1MM A Round – Feb 2014

2/20/14kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

14

ProcessSlide15

The Rise of LegalTech

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

15

ProcessSlide16

Scenario

Massachusetts analyst (Mia) sends Request for Information (RFI) to Department of Homeland Security agent (Feddy). RFI contains criminal history info about a specific person (RBGuy); regulated by Massachusetts General Law 6-172.

RFI re:RBGuy

MGL

6-172

Mia

Feddy Slide17

Simple Compliance Answer

Transaction is compliant with

Massachusetts General Law, Part I, Title II,

Chapter 6, Section 172.

”Slide18

Detailed Explanation

[Recipient,] Fred Agenti, is a member of a

Criminal Justice Agency…

”Slide19

Program Code & Code

Process

Philosophy

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

19Slide20

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

20

Text of the StatuteSlide21

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

21

Process Flow DiagramSlide22

22

Party Subject to the Rule

RULE Verb

Transaction Verb

Data Subject to the Rule

Party subject to the Rule

Attribute of Party subject to rule

Person Context

Rule Type

Activity Type

Data Category

Special Data Category

Data Context

Government:

Federal:

Agency

 

 

Prohibited

Share

Person

PII:

US Person

Source:

System

Of Records

People Involved in the Data Transaction

Circumstances in which the rule applies

Releasing Entity

Attribute of Party subject to rule

Context

Accessing Entity

Attribute of Party subject to rule

Context

Authorized Purpose detail

Government:

Federal:

Agency

 

 

Person;

Government:

Federal:

Agency

 

 

 

Administrative information that makes it possible to understand precedence, provenance, and linkages

Rule precedence type

"Facilities" rule

Document

Document Citation

Document sub-Reference

Dated

1.2a:

Federal Statute

 

The Privacy Act

The Privacy Act, 5 USC § 552a

(b)

 

Administrative information that makes it possible to understand precedence, provenance, and linkages

Record Number

Old Record Numbers

Linked to Rule Name

Linked to Records

Link Reason

Changed Perspective Flag

Perspective

180001

 

1) Definitions:

Agency,

System of Records,

Record

 

1) AND,

 

 

2/20/2014

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

Mapping of the StatuteSlide23

Cross-Ontology

KB

MDCCL

12.15.01.03

(Definitions)

MGL

6-172

MD

MA

User Profiles

User Profiles

User Docs

Policies

Policies

Mia

MGL 66A-1

(Definitions)

MGL

Ontology

RFI

Reasoner

Maury

RBGuy

MDCCL

Ontology

Org. Admin.

Certified

List

MGL

6-172

Context Data RequiredSlide24

Computing Law

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

24Slide25

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

25Slide26

Jurisdiction: Zip Code & Legal Code

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

26Slide27

Impact of Availability

Philosophy

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

27Slide28

Collaborative Government

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

28

PhilosophySlide29

Speed of Blur

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com

29Slide30

Thank you

2/20/14kkw@LawTechIntersect.com30Slide31

31

Bio - K. Krasnow Waterman

2/20/14

kkw@LawTechIntersect.com