/
Bourdieu and Young People’s Tenancy Sustainment Bourdieu and Young People’s Tenancy Sustainment

Bourdieu and Young People’s Tenancy Sustainment - PowerPoint Presentation

jane-oiler
jane-oiler . @jane-oiler
Follow
420 views
Uploaded On 2017-06-06

Bourdieu and Young People’s Tenancy Sustainment - PPT Presentation

Alasdair Stewart Postgraduate Researcher Young Peoples Tenancy Sustainment Young people disproportionately at risk of not sustaining an independent tenancy over the course of a year SCSH 2007 ID: 556574

housing tenancy field sustainment tenancy housing sustainment field homelessness sustain adversity risk people importance structural young 2009 division personal

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Bourdieu and Young People’s Tenancy Su..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Bourdieu and Young People’s Tenancy Sustainment

Alasdair Stewart

Postgraduate ResearcherSlide2

Young People’s Tenancy Sustainment

Young people disproportionately at risk of not sustaining an independent tenancy over the course of a yearSCSH (2007) 37% of 16 and 17 year olds in Edinburgh and 32% in Glasgow did not sustain their tenancyFor the general population this was 19% and 20% respectivelyHarding (2004)44.9% did not sustain their tenancyGlasgow Housing Association Research (2006)

34% of 18-25 years olds did not sustain their tenancySlide3

New Homeless Orthodoxy“structural factors create the conditions within which homelessness will occur; and

people with personal problems are more vulnerable to these adverse social and economic trends than others; thereforea high concentration of people with personal problems in the homeless population can be explained by their susceptibility to macro-structural forces rather than necessitating an individual explanation of homelessness.”(Fitzpatrick, 2005: 4) Slide4

Developments within the New OrthodoxyFitzpatrick (2005) and critical realism

McNaughton (2008, 2009) and ‘writing agency back in’Slide5

BourdieuGenerative structuralism

[(habitus) (capital)] + field = practice Slide6

The Importance of FieldNomos – vision and division

Art for art’s sakeIs housing a field?Welfare as unique form of fieldSlide7

Net Income After Housing Cost per Week by Hours WorkedSlide8

Division amongst welfare’s subfields and the importance of Capital

Structural imbalance between the symbolic division of age between housing and benefits. Effective over-ruling of housing policy by benefits officer.Denial of benefit eligibility leading to rent arrears and risk of tenancy non-sustainmentSlide9

The Importance of HabitusExperience of homelessness upon perception of tenancy

Stressing non-consciousnessMale / female and job huntingSingle parentsSlide10

ConclusionsNeed to go beyond landlord perspective

If not accounting for continued adversity despite tenancy sustainment there is a risk, as Bottrell (2009: 334) warns, of resilience being comprised and changed from "positive adaptation despite adversity to positive adaptation to adversity". Slide11