/
CONFLICTING  PERSPECTIVES CONFLICTING  PERSPECTIVES

CONFLICTING PERSPECTIVES - PowerPoint Presentation

jane-oiler
jane-oiler . @jane-oiler
Follow
396 views
Uploaded On 2016-03-07

CONFLICTING PERSPECTIVES - PPT Presentation

MODULE C THE JUSTICE GAME 2013 RELATED MATERIALS FOR REFLECTIONCONSIDERATION For The Romans in Britain Diana on the Dock Does Privacy Matter The Trials of Oz Conflicting Perspectives ID: 245788

www http perspectives conflicting http www conflicting perspectives ken smh 2013 robinson html abc story carlton watch australian perspective

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "CONFLICTING PERSPECTIVES" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

CONFLICTING PERSPECTIVESMODULE C – THE JUSTICE GAME2013

RELATED MATERIALS FOR REFLECTION/CONSIDERATION

For:

The Romans in Britain

Diana on the Dock: Does Privacy Matter?

The Trials of OzSlide2

Conflicting PerspectivesWhat does it mean?

When reflecting/researching related materials keep the following ideas in mind:

The ideas that are conveyed through the representation of the conflicting perspectives.

How conflicting perspectives are represented through an event, personality and/or situation.

How the act of representation – the form, medium of production and language - is shaped by the experiences, purpose and perspective of the composer. Slide3

Dot point #1: The ideas that are conveyed through the representation of the conflicting perspectives. This concept reflects on the premise that we as the audience have a perspective (or in fact several perspectives) on an idea/value/attitude that is important to us.

As an audience – a reader/viewer – we are presented with various different/diverse perspectives.

How our understanding be further shaped/re-shaped/altered/changed

.

Let’s consider an idea (for example, EDUCATION).

EVERYONE has thoughts on this issue.

Reflect on how there are various conflicting representations.

Activity:

Write down what YOU believe is the purpose of EDUCATION.

Reflect on the viewing stimulus provided on the next slide.

Has your perspective been re-shaped/altered/changed?

How and why?Slide4

Dot point #1: The ideas that are conveyed through the representation of the conflicting perspectives.

Viewing:

Reflect on the discussions/opinions/evidence provided in the links listed. How do the ideas/discussions points/examples ‘conflict’ with your perspective/s of the purpose of education?

What does school really teach children?

http://www.knowledgeoftoday.org/2013/01/what-does-school-really-teach-children.html

 

THINK for yourself. Question everything!

- http://www.knowledgeoftoday.org/2012/03/think-for-yourself-question-everything.html?m=1

Ken Robinson says school kills creativity (2006)

http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.html

Ken Robinson: Bring on the learning revolution! (2010)

http://www.ted.com/talks/sir_ken_robinson_bring_on_the_revolution.html

Ken Robinson: Changing educations paradigms (2010)

http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_changing_education_paradigms.html

Ken Robinson: How to escape education’s death valley (2013)

http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_how_to_escape_education_s_death_valley.htmlSlide5

Dot point #2: How conflicting perspectives are represented through an event, personality and/or situation. Australian Story V Mike Carlton

Australian Story (ABC) recently presented (May 2013) a story on 2GB presenter Ray Hadley.

Mike Carlton (former colleague and SMH journalist) was interviewed as a part of the piece.

The following day, Carlton wrote a reply to what he believed was the deliberate manipulation and editing of his interview by the ABC to present Hadley in a way that he disagreed with.

View:

the documentary of Ray Hadley from

Australian Story

.

Australian Story

(20 May 2013) – Listen to Me

-

http://

www.abc.net.au/austory/specials/listentome/default.htm

Read:

the article published by the SMH and written by Mike Carlton about his concerns about the editing of his interview.

SMH

May (21 May 2013) - Mike Carlton lashes Australian Story for 'selective edits' over Ray Hadley comments -

http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/mike-carlton-lashes-australian-story-for-selective-edits-over-ray-hadley-comments-20130521-2jyiw.html

Slide6

Dot point #2: How conflicting perspectives are represented through an event, personality and/or situation. The public V public debate

Many of the essays set for study in the

Justice Game

reflect the debate of what is in the interest of the public and what should remain private.

Activity:

View the pieces from Media Watch (ABC) provided here.

Reflect on the following:

What is in the interest of the public?

Who sets the standards/benchmarks for this?What are the ethical/moral standards?

What

should

be private?

What is defined as an invasion of privacy?

What are the motivations for publishing details of an event,

personality and/or situation?

Media Watch

, Episode 17, 27 May

2013

Promoting

propaganda V public interest -

http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s3768523.htm

 

Media Watch

, Episode 13, 29 April 2013

You Tweet, I Follow -

http://

www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s3747726.htm

Media Watch

, Episode 10, 8 April 2013

Protecting the Famous -

http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s3732366.htmSlide7

Dot point #3: How the act of representation – the form, medium of production and language – is shaped by the experiences, purpose and perspective of the composer.

The Chaser’s

War on Everything

Composers may parody and/or satire as way of making their audience question a perspective/idea/value/

attitude.

But when is too much, TOO much?

Consider The Chaser’s

War on Everything

. Known for ‘pushing the envelope’ what were the conflicting perspectives about the following TWO headlines?:

APEC stunt – crossing into the ‘red zone’

Make a Realistic Wish Foundation – childhood cancer

Chasers APEC Motorcade Stunt FULL (2007)

http

://

www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdnAaQ0n5-8

APEC's surprise guest - Mr bin Laden of

Canada

SMH

September 7, 2007

http://

www.smh.com.au/news/national/bin-laden-crashes-apec/2007/09/06/1188783415499.html

Chasers – Make a Realistic Wish Foundation (2009)

http://

www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYS_ExI3nXQ

‘Good humour or bad taste’

The Age

, June

22, 2009

http://

education.theage.com.au/cmspage.php?intid=135&intversion=277

'They're going to die anyway': calls for Chaser to be axed over 'callous'

skit,

SMH

, June 2 2009

http://

www.smh.com.au/news/entertainment/tv/2009/06/04/1243708544308.htmlSlide8

What are the links to The Justice GameConsider the following essays by Robertson and how the ideas represented in them:

add to your understanding of the materials provided in this presentation.

g

ive you a more insight/complex understanding of the issues being raised by Robertson.

The essays are:

The Romans in Britain

Diana on the Dock: Does Privacy Matter

?

The Trials of Oz