Agenda Introductory Summary including Questions Character Sketches Basic Facts Quotes on Corporate Governance An Outline on Corporate Governance Leading Categories Basic Questions Who embodies the best approach to corporate governance ID: 742071
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Corporate Governance Hewlett-Packard Cas..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Corporate Governance
Hewlett-Packard CaseSlide2
Agenda
Introductory Summary including Questions
Character Sketches
Basic Facts
Quotes on Corporate Governance
An Outline on Corporate Governance: Leading CategoriesSlide3
Basic Questions
Who embodies the best approach to corporate governance?
Dunn who takes a compliance approach best outlined in the Law of Agency
Perkins who takes more of a stewardship approach that places less emphasis on compliance
Perkins and Dunn have different takes on the leaks of information made by board members to the press
For Perkins, leaks performed the function of a “release valve” that allowed frustrated insiders to vent concerns about company policy
For Dunn, leaks were, first and foremost, violations of company confidentiality, ultimate damaging because they undermined relations of trust necessary for board deliberationsSlide4
Hardware Software
Physical Surroundings
People, Groups, and Roles
Procedures
Laws
Information and Information Structures
Pretexting
Tools:
Telephones, cell phones,
Internet,
PowerPoint Presentations
Silicone Valley (Home
of Venture Capitalism)
Director of HP Board
HP Board Members
Tech Board
Finance Reporters
SEC
HP Mgt (CEO)
Public Relations
Private
Investigators
Speaking
with Press (On/Off Record)
Electing Board Members
R/ Board-Mgt
Procedures for
Pretexting
Model for Corp Gov (Agency
vs
Stewardship)
Identity authenticating Procedures
Post-Enron:
Sarbanes
/ Oxley
Fed Sentencing Guidelines
SEC
Regs
Privacy
Legis
Law of Agency
Company records (Employee Info)
Tele
info (Call records)
Emails (stored info)
Project Kona I
Project Kona II
Confidentiality
M
M
V
X V
X V
X V
Privacy
M V
M V (Press pierces
privacy)
M
V (Press Procedures / Role Conflict)
M
V (Transparency of Law)
M
V
Trust
M
V
M
V (Maintained by mgt but vulnerable to Board Members
M V
Undermined by transparency
of law
Supported by keeping
information confidentialSlide5
STS Highlights
Confidentiality
Protected under law of agency. General expectation that information on BOD deliberations is confidentiality. This preserves trust
Hardware, software and procedures protect confidentiality
Leaks to press considered violation of confidentiality (relation to press and procedures = vulnerability)
Privacy
Protected piece-meal by law. However, as case progressed,
pretexting
became illegal because it bordered on ID theft and invasion of privacy
Pretexting
involves a deception
Privacy and Confidentiality are in conflict with transparency mandated by Sarbanes-Oxley and Federal Sentencing GuidelinesSlide6
Pretexting
Enabled PIs to track reporter and board member movements by hacking into email exchanges and phone records
Used SS#s of Board members to open false email accounts
Sent emails to reports posing as potential leakers. Emails had Trojan Horses to access computer files and emails records
“it involved investigators requesting information from operators orally, over the phone, pretending to be someone else if necessary.” (
DeLia
quoted in Stewart
)
“created a fictitious disgruntled employee named Jacob to make e-mail contact with Kawamoto. “ E-mail has a Trojan HorseSlide7
Corporate GovernanceSlide8
Lawrence and Webber on CG
“The system of allocating power in a corporation that determines how and by whom the company is to be directed.” 557
“The term corporate governance refers to the process by which a company is controlled or governed. Just as nations have governments that respond to the needs of citizens and establish policy, so do corporations have systems of internal governance that determine overall strategic direction and balance sometimes divergent interests.” 320Slide9
Stewart on Corporate Governance
“a term that technically refers to all aspects of running a corporation but in recent years has come to emphasize issues of fairness, transparency, and accountability.”
Questions:
How does transparency required by corporate governance fit in with the confidentiality required for Board of Director Deliberations Slide10
Dunn on corporate governance
“The most fundamental duties of a director—the duties of deliberation and candor—rely entirely upon the absolute trust that each director must have in one another’s confidentiality. This is true for trivial as well as important matters, because even trivial information that finds its way from the boardroom to the press corrodes trust among directors. It is even more critical when discussions can affect stock prices….Leaking “good” information is as unacceptable as leaking “bad” information—no one can foretell how such information may advantage or disadvantage one investor relative to another.” (quoted by Stewart, 156)Slide11
CG Models
Agency Theory
Managers act as the agents of the
corporation
Problem = keeping managers faithful to the
interests of the owners / investors
Stakeholder theory
Corporation is run, by its managers, for the sake of the stakeholders
Managers are not just faithful agents of
stakeholders. Instead of faithful agency, they are responsible for balancing conflicting stakeholder stakes
corporation
Stewardship theory
Starts from premise that manager and owner interests are
more or less the same
Managers
act, not as agents, but as stewards
for
stakeholders
Stakeholder interests are aligned with the long term wellbeing of the corporation. Managers facilitate this alignment. Slide12
Agency Theory (Dunn)
Owners/directors
set the central objectives of the corporation.
Managers
executing
these.
Corporate governance = procedures to control management and restrict to carrying out owner directives.
Managers
cannot be trusted to remain faithful
to interests
and goals of the owners/directors.
Human Nature = Egoistic pursuit of self-interest
The
owners/directors
= principal.
Originates
the action and bears primary moral and legal responsibility for it.
Principal delegates executive authority to agent, often because of a lack of knowledge of details pertinent to execution
Develops compliance structures to compel agents to be faithful to interests in executive function.
Managers = agents
.
Responsibility: serve
as faithful executors of the goals and interests of the
principals
Positively this assumes the exercise of due care (proper exercise of professional judgment)
Negatively: avoiding conflicts of interests and maintaining confidences
Bound and Free Agency
Corporate Governance Focus
Primary
emphasis is placed on compliance, i.e., enforced conformity to rules that constitute minimum thresholds of acceptable behavior.
(1
) rule based codes, (2) systems of monitoring to detect violations, and (3) punishments and rewards to deter non-compliance and reward
complianceSlide13
Stewardship Theory (Perkins)
Managers
and employees can be trusted to act as stewards or guardians of the corporation.
A
steward is a caretaker who looks after the owner's property and interests when the owner is absent
Corporation modeled on conception of a social contract
Corporation is a
cooperative, collaborative enterprise.
Individuals transcend narrow self interest and find
meaning
in concerns of corporation
Managers can, to a certain extent, act on altruistic motives
CG consists of build
trust and social
capital.
Owners
still establish the cardinal objectives for
corporation
But
they
must provide
managers with an environment
conducive to meaningful
work.
Stewardship focuses on management by values
(
1) identify and formulate common aspirations or values as standards of excellence,
(
2)
encourage employees to adopt values as core aspirations through training programs, ethics audits, corporate codes, and so forth
(
3) respond to values "
gaps“ by means of moral support
Training programs
DPO procedures
Proactive performance evaluations
Empowering leadershipSlide14
Sarbanes-Oxley
Provide
increased protection for whistle-blowers
Adhere
to an established code of ethics or explain reasons for non-compliance
Engage
in "full, fair, timely and understandable disclosure"
Maintain“ honest
and ethical" behavior.
Report
ethics violations promptly
Comply
with "applicable governmental laws, rules, and regulations"
Quoted
from
Dyrud
, M.A. (2007) "Ethics, Gaming, and Industrial Training," in IEEE Technology and Society Magazine. Winter 2007:
36-4.
Dyurd
cites: ELT, Ethics and Code of Conduct,
n.d
.; http://
www.elt-inc.com/solution/ethics_and_code_of_conduct_training_obligations.htmlSlide15
Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Establishing
standards and procedures to prevent and detect criminal conduct
Promoting
responsibility at all levels of the program, together with adequate program resources and authority for its managers
Exercising
due diligence in hiring and assigning personnel to positions with substantial authority
Communicating
standards and procedures, including a specific requirement for training at all levels
Monitoring
, auditing, and non-internal guidance/reporting systems
Promoting
and enforcing of compliance and ethical conduct
T
aking
reasonable steps to respond appropriately and prevent further misconduct in detecting a
violation
Dyrud
, M.A. (2007) "Ethics, Gaming, and Industrial Training," in IEEE Technology and Society Magazine. Winter 2007: 36-44. Slide16
Characters / ParticipantsSlide17
Patricia Dunn
Board member and supported ouster of
Fiorina
Specialist in corporate governance with impeccable reputation
Advanced through ranks of Wells Fargo Investment Advisors (later acquired by Barclays) to become CEO of BarclaysSlide18
Carly
Fiorina
CEO of HP until ousted by board
High profile corporate executive
Considered a good salesperson but a poor manager by members of the board
Later Republican candidate for US senate from CaliforniaSlide19
Jay Keyworth
Longest-standing member of HP BOD
Physics division at Los Alamos National Laboratory
Developed close relation with CNET report, Dawn Kawamoto
When identified as source of leaks was forced to leave HP BODSlide20
Tom Perkins
Close relation with HP founders and family
Venture Capitalist
Author of “Sex and the Single Zillionaire”
“Heather was nude upon the bed and Kim, above, was also nude, but wearing some sort of complicated black leather harness…” (It goes on from there0
Resigned from board in protest over removal of
Keyworth
.
Later, claimed he was victim of invasion of privacy by HP investigation. Responsible for information of investigation becoming public outside of HPSlide21
Ron DeLia
Private Investigator
From Boston firm, Security Outsourcing Solutions
Firm uses
pretexting
to get information on board members to advance leak investigation
Were these methods an invasion of the privacy of board members? Were they illegalSlide22
Basic Facts / Case NarrativeSlide23
Basic Facts
Carly
Firoina
became CEO of HP and sought to reinvent the company
“
Fiorina
had a vision, and she did a phenomenal job acquiring Compaq and
comgining
the assets. But we had to make the assets deliver. We had an execution problem. The stock took a bit hit. She was a better saleswoman than a manager.” (Stewart 156)
Fiorina
was fired by the BODs in a very political manner
Rumors of board discontent were leaked to press in advance of decision
Leaks also occurred about a strategic planning meeting held by
Fiorina
with HP board (source talked about long days and imparted strategic plans of HP that could affect stock prices)
Fiorina
: It was probably
Keyworth
and Perkins two board members who felt that HP should return to its more aggressive, venture capitalist culture who were the sources of the leaksSlide24
Back to Basic Facts
Dunn became “on-executive” chairperson of HP Board of Directors
Board appointed Mark
Hurd
CEO of HP to take place of
Fiorina
Top priority: stop board leaks to the press
Two investigations were eventually carried out called the Kona files after a vacation retreat in Hawaii used by DunnSlide25
Basic Facts
First investigation yielded no concrete results
Not clear who leaker was
Second investigation used more aggressive techniques
Hired PI firm (Ronald R.
DeLia
from Security Outsourcing Solutions from Boston)
In second investigation, firm used a method called
pretexting
“it involved investigators requesting information from operators orally, over the phone, pretending to be someone else if necessary.” (
DeLia
quoted in Stewart)
“created a fictitious disgruntled employee named Jacob to make e-mail contact with Kawamoto. “ E-mail has a Trojan HorseSlide26
E-Mail (Quoted from Stewart, 160)
Hello, I am a senior level executive with a high tech firm in the valley and an avid reader of your columns.
My real name is not used, you might understand why. Not quite sure how to approach you on this, but I’ll attempt anyway.
In short, tired of broken promises, misguided initiatives and generally bad treatment.
Have some information that I would be interested in passing along.
Felt it might be appropriate to contact you.Slide27
Basic Facts
Board Meeting held to inform them about results of leak investigations
Jay
Keyworth
was identified as source of leaks
Apologized to board; thought he’d only get a slap on the wrist
But Board voted to request his resignation
Perkins objected: “Jay is the longest serving director on this board!” (Stewart 163)
Perkins resigns in
protest
Because
Keyworth
was fired or because of
pretexting
?Slide28
Basic Facts
Resignations of Board members must be reported to the SEC
No reason given initially
Perkins gets message from ATT that it had to lock his online account. But he had not set up such an account. This was done as part of
pretexting
used during leak investigation.
Perkins: “My personal phone records were ‘hacked’”
“I am now legally obliged to disclose publicly the reasons for my resignation. This is a very sad duty.
Perkins states as his reasons his objections to the violation of his and other board members’ privacy by the leak investigationsSlide29
Leaks: A “steam valve” or a violation of trust?Slide30
Perkins on leaks
“Leaks don’t happen in stable, happy companies. They’re a steam valve. People talk. They’re a symptom of something else.”Slide31
Leaks or press handling?
Message to
Keyworth
(HP board member) about how to handle press
“Please transition to
Carly
and her skill set. Specifically, her brilliant strategic mind and her confidence—illustrated by her deep engagement of the board….This is an opportunity for us to reset
Carly’s
image to show the
Carly
we all know and love.”
Keyworth
talked to press, specifically to Dawn Kawamoto, a reporter fro CNET
He felt conversations were continuation of public relations directives in above e-mail and not leaks although the information printed in Kawamoto story was not common knowledge.
This was, he felt, a way of getting positive press for the company and building up good will with an influential reporterSlide32
Keyworth on Leaks
“I apologize for any discussion I had with the reporter in question that may have resulted in any of my colleagues on this board losing trust with me.”
“All I did was take advantage of a lunch with a reporter to say some nice things about Mark
Hurd
. I thought the worst that might happen would be that they’d slap my wrist.”
Quoted by Stewart 163Slide33
Fiorina on Leaks
“It is hard to convey how violated I felt. Until a board makes a decision, its deliberations are confidential….Trust is a business imperative. No board or management can operate effectively without it.…I sent an e-mail message to the board. I informed them of the leak. I said this was completely unacceptable behavior by a board member. I convened a conference call for Saturday morning. I was as cold as ice during the call. I said the board could not operate in this way and I would not.…Jay [
Keyworth
] Dick [
Hackborn
], and Tom [Perkins] all acknowledged that the reporter had contacted them. They all denied they had spoken with her.”
Fiorina
, Tough Choices. Quoted by Lawrence, 504.”Slide34
Conclusion
Hewlett-Packard, a company with outstanding ethics reputation, suffered as a result of invasive investigation
Dunn was targeted for federal prosecution
Did she properly supervise investigation?
Dunn and Perkins embody different approaches to corporate governance
Agency and Stewardship approaches respectively
Case shows how shifting government environment of organization has altered traditional business practices
Emphasis of Sarbanes-Oxley on transparency undermines internal corporate confidentiality and trust built on it.