Beta Beam timetable and cost EUROnu meeting Paris 1215 June 20121505 1 European Strategy for Neutrino Oscillation Physics II Elena Wildner 1 We consider the lengthiest item to define the time line ID: 488190
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Elena Wildner, CERN" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Elena Wildner, CERN
Beta Beam: timetable and cost
EUROnu
meeting Paris 12-15 JuneSlide2
2012-15-05
1
European Strategy for Neutrino Oscillation Physics - II, Elena Wildner
1
We consider the lengthiest item to define the time line
For the R&D we also take the longest time.
However the R&D is essentially a number of smaller things
To execute necessary work in the CERN complex: evaluation needed of co-existence constraints (LHC shutdowns, upgrades, integration…)The already existing machines are an asset but also a difficulty since an evaluation of the cost to upgrade or replace equipment is not straight forwardWe do not consider this here.
What is meant by time table?Slide3
2012-15-05
2
European Strategy for Neutrino Oscillation Physics - II, Elena Wildner
2
Consolidate
Production,
make scaling
ECR-Source ConsolidationStudy of RFQ(s) efficienciesPS injectionPS and SPS acceleration (beam transmission)Optimization of bunching for maximal neutrino fluxShielding in all machines
Decay Ring dumps/abort
Decay
Ring Instrumentation
Etc.
List of research topics,
non exhaustive, study neededSlide4
2012-15-05
3
European Strategy for Neutrino Oscillation Physics - II, Elena Wildner
3
Consolidate Production make scaling
ECR
-Source Consolidation
Study of RFQ(s) efficienciesPS injectionPS and SPS acceleration (beam transmission)Optimization of bunching for maximal neutrino fluxShielding in all machines Decay Ring dumps/abort
Decay
Ring Instrumentation
Etc.
List of research topics,
non exhaustive, study needed
These are all very different disciplines: different people
=> 3
years R & DSlide5
2012-15-05
4
European Strategy for Neutrino Oscillation Physics - II, Elena Wildner
4
Planning
The most time demanding item should be pulled out:
Decay Ring
Magnets (CERN magnet group): magnet design and model construction: 2.5 yearsmagnet full length prototype: 2 yearsseries production: tendering (materials, Superconductor and assembly contracts): 0.75 yearseries production: production preparation (tooling construction, SC and material deliveries): 1 yearseries production:: 3 years (for 152 magnets)Total: 9.25 yearsresistive magnets (series of 30 magnets):total: 3 yearsSlide6
2012-15-05
5
European Strategy for Neutrino Oscillation Physics - II, Elena Wildner
5
Planning
R & D 3 years
DR Magnets 10 years
Installation in addition 1 yearThe civil engineering can be done the 6 last years during magnet constructionComissioning: 1 yearTotal ~ 15 years Slide7
2012-15-05
6
European Strategy for Neutrino Oscillation Physics - II, Elena Wildner
6
Costing Situation
Civil Engineering for Beta Beams treated in Special presentation
Decay Ring Magnet costs available (Magnet group) Powering will come
Cryostating not yetElectricity, maybe… scaling ? can be a jump functionLinac cost: scalingRFQ: Twice the cost as for “normal” Linac
RCS cost from EURISOL
Instrumentation: scaling
Upgrades PS/SPS not available
Targets (scaling and projections)
Infrastructure not available, scaling from civil engineering data?
Decay Ring Instrumentation (scaled)
ECR
costed
ok
RF Decay Ring
costed
okSlide8
2012-15-05
7
European Strategy for Neutrino Oscillation Physics - II, Elena Wildner
7
Problems
Very limited resources (if any) or help to do the
costing
No useful (practical) guidelinesSlide9
2012-15-05
8
European Strategy for Neutrino Oscillation Physics - II, Elena Wildner
8
Common guidelines…
Work with WP3 & WP2 – costing representatives to streamline and share information has been done
d
uring this meeting and will progress until we have our internal review