Dr Amanda Phelan CoDirector National Centre for the Protection of Older People Amandaphelanucdie01 7166482 Irish Definition A single or repeated act or lack of action occurring within any relationship where there is an expectation of trust which causes harm or distress to an older pers ID: 617501
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Perspectives on elder abuse in Ireland" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Perspectives on elder abuse in Ireland
Dr. Amanda Phelan
Co-Director National Centre for the Protection of Older People
Amanda.phelan@ucd.ie/01
7166482Slide2
Irish Definition
A single or repeated act or lack of action occurring within any relationship where there is an expectation of trust, which causes harm or distress to an older person or violates their human and civil rights
’ Protecting our Future (2002).Slide3
Typologies
Physical abuse
Psychological AbuseFinancial abuseSexual abuseNeglect (commission/omission) AgeismStranger abuse not recognisedSelf NeglectSlide4
Health Service Executive Structure
Elder Abuse Services in
IrelandSlide5
National Center for the Protection of Older People
Established in 2008
Lead by the School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems with collaborations from the School of Applied Social Science, School of Public Health and Population Science, the School of Medicine and Medical Science and the Geary Institute. Negotiated programme of research.Slide6
Outputs to dateSlide7
What influences the visibility of elder abuse?
Overt & and covert ageist perceptions (Phelan 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013) Confusion of physical and mental decline with elder abuse.
FamilyBusy practice areaDifficult topicDon’t know what to do
Uncomfortable
Assumption that care facilities
are satisfactory.Slide8
Measuring Prevalence of Abuse
in Ireland
Family, Professional carers, Close friend
Neighbours, Acquaintances
Strangers
Interviews with 2021older people
Position
of
Trust relationshipSlide9
In the previous 12-months
Financial
≥1
incident money or possessions stolen, forced to sign over property, change will
Physical
≥1
incidents slapped, pushed, restrained
Sexual
≥1
incident sexually spoken to touched
Psychological
≥
10
incidents or serious impact insulted, threatened, excluded, prevented seeing people
Neglect
≥
10
incidents or serious impact refusal or failure of carer to help with activities of daily living such as shopping, washing or dressing
Operational Definition
Inter-personal
abuse
Slide10
Prevalence of mistreatment was
2.2 %
(95% CI 1.41, 2.94)
Population
10,201
(6598, 13,757)
Clustering of abuse: 25% (psychological abuse)
Irish Prevalence
Mistreatment Types
Slide11
Adult Children 50% of the over mistreatment
Perpetrators
Relationship of Perpetrator to the Older PersonSlide12
84% perceived mistreatment had a very serous impact
Physical/Sexual abuse 100%
Financial abuse 89%
Psychological Abuse 68%
Neglect 50%
Impact
& Response
Response to MistreatmentSlide13
Any mistreatment since 65 years
Any Mistreatment 4%
Psychological 2.4%
Financial 1.4%
Neglect 1.2%
Physical/Sexual 0.7%
Alternative
Definition
Mistreatment wider Community (12-mth)
Any Mistreatment 2.9%
Financial 1.8%
Psychological 1.7%
Physical/Sexual 0.7%
Neglect 0.3%Slide14
Findings of Prevalence Study
12-month prevalence of abuse & neglect 2.2%
Over 10,000 people
Older person characteristics
Female
Age
Lower socio-economic circumstances
Health especially mental health
Social isolation
Perpetrator characteristics
Adult Children
Male
Middle age
Unemployment
AddictionSlide15
How big is the problem?
2.2%
12 mth
Position of trust
2.9%
12
mth
wider
community
4.0%
Age 65 yrs & POT
5.5%
Age 65 yrs wider
community
10,201
18,764
13,429
25,735Slide16
Prevalence of Elder Abuse
‘Impressionistic
estimates’ (Bonnie & Wallace 2003
)
HSE
referrals
(2,302 in 2011) vs. prevalence.
Abuse percentage
Study
and Year
Prevalence:
2-4%
O Keefe et al. 2007 (UK),
Naughton
et al 2010 (IRE)
Prevalence
: 18.4%Lowenstein (2003) (Israel)Prevalence: 11.4%Acerino et al (2010) (US)
Prevalence: 10%Amstader (2011) (South Carolina)Prevalence: 1:24Lifespan of Greater Rochester Inc.et al 2011
(NYS)Slide17
Elder abuse & dementia
Studies complicated by data being collected primarily from caregivers.
May not recognise abusive behavioursUnder-reportingPathological caregivers may not engage in research.Physical, psychological and neglect Slide18
Elder Abuse & Dementia
Older people with dementia are particularly prone to abuse (Cooper et al 2008,
Wiglesworth
et al 2010 )
Family caregivers may be unaware of actions that are abusive (Beech et al. 2005).
In a study Caring for Relative with dementia (CARD) over half reported physical or psychological abuse and one third met the criteria of significant abuse (Cooper et al. 2009).Slide19
Financial abuse
Nest egg
Family members and strangers were found to have perpetrated the abuse through spending money without permission, forced signing over of money/assets or having a forged signature.Family members were also found to have made imprudent decisions regarding finances, stolen money and also not provided the older person with copies of financial transactions. (Acierno et al. 2009)O
lder
people are 34 percent more likely than people in their 40s to lose money though scams
(Research & Consulting 2013)
Easy List, Mooch list!Slide20
Issues
Autonomy Vs. Risk.
Organisational ‘whistle-blowing’ policy (internal & external).Confidentiality policy.Slide21
Responses
Address ageism
Safeguarding approachChange culture- education, values and beliefs.Increase detection: contacts with older people, financial institutionsMulti disciplinary Interventions to meet individual need- health and social care, police and legal.Status functional capacity.Advocacy and empowerment‘Best interests’Slide22
The substance of decision making
Welfare extends beyond safety and physical health….to happiness.
We must adapt a pragmatic common sense and robust approach to the identification, evaluation and management of perceived risk…sensible risk appraisal not avoidance of riskDisproportional risk (Munby 2011) Slide23
Conclusions
Societal Reform:
Safeguarding approach: Legislation, policy.Education of older people and societyMulti-disciplinary and multi-agency response.Promote financial autonomyEnsure ‘best interests’.Screen, ask and assess financial capacityFinancial institutionsIndependent adviceSlide24
Thank you for your attention
Amanda.phelan@ucd.ie
01 7166482