PPT-Revising Risk Assessments for Sexual Recidivism: STABLE-2007 Change and the Effects of

Author : karlyn-bohler | Published Date : 2018-02-17

R Karl Hanson PhD CPsych rkarlhansongmailcom Karlhansoncanadaca NOTA Regional Conferences 2017 Stirling Scotland April 24 Cardiff Wales April 26 Newry Co Down

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Revising Risk Assessments for Sexual Rec..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Revising Risk Assessments for Sexual Recidivism: STABLE-2007 Change and the Effects of: Transcript


R Karl Hanson PhD CPsych rkarlhansongmailcom Karlhansoncanadaca NOTA Regional Conferences 2017 Stirling Scotland April 24 Cardiff Wales April 26 Newry Co Down Northern Ireland April 28. Myth. : A . popular belief or tradition that has grown up around something or someone; especially : one embodying the ideals and institutions of a society or segment of society . "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.". CHILD PORNOGRAPHY (CP) OFFENDERS: . BEST PRACTICES FOR ASSESSMENT AND TESTIMONY BASED ON THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE. Eric A. Imhof, . Psy.D. .. MiATSA. 2013 Conference. May 30, 2013. . “WE WHO LABOR HERE SEEK ONLY THE TRUTH”. Corrections. Oct 2 2014. Presentation Overview: Assumptions about Risk of Recidivism. All US Corrections policies are based on. . assumptions about recidivism and risk . levels that are important to understand:. Week 2. James M. Byrne, . Professor. School of Criminology and Criminal Justice . Presentation Overview: Assumptions about Risk of Recidivism. We will present the RNR Simulation Tool assumptions about recidivism and risk levels:. Professor James Byrne. Presentation Overview: Assumptions about Risk of Recidivism. All US Corrections policies are based on assumptions about recidivism and risk levels that are important to understand:. Matt Frize. (Acting) Manager. Clinical & Forensic Psychologist. Community . Justice . Program. Matthew.frize@facs.nsw.gov.au . Thanks. Prof Doug Boer – . Uni. of Canberra. Prof Alex Blaszczynski – . Louisiana Judicial Conference. The Bluffs. October 18-20, 2012. Judge Roger K. Warren (Ret.). “What is done [today] in corrections would be grounds for malpractice in medicine.”. (2002) . Latessa. Seminary Hacks. Overview. Real writing begins not with the first draft of a text, but rather with the successive revisions and rewrites of that draft, each of which clarifies and refines the argument and message. The full set of processes and actions utilized in revision are what creates real writing that is lasting and memorable. . Established in 1994. High-risk. sexual offender returned to Hamilton community after sentence. Neighbourhood . fears. – police powerless. Local pastor asked by psychologist to help. Gathered group of church members together to . . Tammy Axelsson & Amy Abbott. March 8, 2017. Objectives. Identify the Risk-Needs-Responsivity Principle. Identify the 8 Guiding Principles for Effective Correctional Intervention. Identify the fundamental concepts underlying the LSI-R risk assessment . Eric S. Janus. Hartford Connecticut. December 2018. S.C. Attorney General Henry McMaster:. “I promise you out there right now, it is raining perverts. They’re all over the place. They’re trying to get into your children.”. AuthorGrant Duwe PhDResearch DirectorEmail grantduwestatemnus1450 Energy Park Drive Suite 200St Paul Minnesota 55108651/361TTY 800/627December 2020This information will be made available in alternativ RATED pAugust 2019 Risk Management Authority2019Name of ToolChild Pornography Offender Risk Tool CPORTCategorySexual Offending Awaiting ValidationAuthor / PublisherSeto and EkeYear2015DescriptionThe C How Did We Get Here?. Levels of Research. Lowest level of evidence. Anecdotal evidence (Gut feeling). Highest level of evidence. Empirical evidence (data based). Need to examine a body of literature.

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Revising Risk Assessments for Sexual Recidivism: STABLE-2007 Change and the Effects of"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents