/
Social Cognition Social Cognition

Social Cognition - PowerPoint Presentation

karlyn-bohler
karlyn-bohler . @karlyn-bohler
Follow
560 views
Uploaded On 2016-07-25

Social Cognition - PPT Presentation

What is social cognition How is it different from social psych and cognitive psych Effortful then automatic then motivated tactician Then applied to different areas like relationships Then social cog neuroscience ID: 418820

free social theory status social free status theory people complex trust thought effects relate study read group rated change differ groups govt

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Social Cognition" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Social CognitionSlide2

Basic questions

What does social cognition include?

How do automatic and controlled processes differ?

Figure 4.1 in book

What does Fiske offer as automatic categories for judgments and stereotypes?

How do we test for automaticity?

What are dual process theories? Examples?

What do researchers mean by saying that humans are “motivated tacticians”?Slide3

Schemas

Bartlett, 1932

What is a schema?

When do people use schemas?

What do we have them on?

How do they affect social cognition? Slide4

Judgment/Heuristics

Tversky

&

Kahneman

(1973)

Representativeness

Counterfactuals (simulation)

Availability

Anchoring and adjustment

What are some reasons we make these mistakes?Slide5

Impression formation (Inference)

Warm vs. cold, intellective

Fiske stereotype content model

Anderson (1968) information integration model

Thin slices of behavior

Why does negative info have more weight?Slide6

Normative theories of attribution

Heider

(1958) Internal vs. external attribution

Jones and Davis (1965) correspondent inference theory

Kelley (1967; 1973) covariation theorySlide7

Attributional errors

FAE (Ross, 1977)

Actor-observer effect (Jones &

Nisbett

, 1972)

Self-serving biases

Taylor and Brown (1988) positive illusionsSlide8

Weiner’s (1985) attribution theory

Achievement, stigma

Locus

Stability

Controllability (global)

Optimistic vs. pessimistic attributional styleSlide9

Priming

What does Fiske say about priming and replication?

Old people primes

Power posing

Money primes

Embodied social cognition

How do primes work in the “real world”? Slide10

Vohs (2015)

Money—what does it prime?

How has it been manipulated?

What effects does it have?Slide11

Caruso, Vohs

, Baxter,

Waytz

, 2013

Money as symbol of free market

E1: 30 adults from study pool. Money in background = more SJ

E2: 168 study pool. Scrambles = more BJW

E3: 80 in dining hall. Scrambles = more SDO

E4: 275

mTurk

. Image = more free market endorsementSlide12

Rohrer, Pashler

, & Harris, 2015

Curious---

Effect sizes huge (.80 vs. .20)

Priming lasted a long time (several minutes)

Lots of the p values just slightly below .05

Emailed authors

Vohs

: 2 additional studies, 19 additional variables

Caruso: 4 additional studies, 2 additional variables

Remember Many Labs? Slide13

So they replicated Caruso et al.Slide14

Or at least tried toSlide15

Why didn’t it replicate?

Rohrer et al.

Measurement error

Too little power

Demand effects

Procedural differences

Type I error in originals

Vohs

Different populations (hidden moderators)

Priming different things (different meanings of money)

Money may prime agency rather than free marketSlide16

Motivated social cogniition

Kunda

(1987)

Examples?

What are some problems with having more information available to us, according to Hills (2019)?

Why do people tend to choose belief-consistent information?

Why do lies spread more quickly?

How does our preference for social information affect how we think?

Table 1

What are some implications of these findings? Slide17

System Justification Theory (Jost

and colleagues)

What is some of the background behind this theory?

What does SJT

predit

?

Six types of false consciousness beliefs—how do people show these?

Denial of injustice

Thinking there is no chance for change

Rationalizing social roles

Incorrect attributions of blame

Identification with high status

Resistance to social changeSlide18

SJT

When is SJ more likely?

What needs does it address? How?

Is this a good or bad thing for those who do it? Slide19

How is SJT similar and different from:

Social identity theory

Social dominance theory

Belief in a just world

Cognitive dissonance

Would system justification occur outside the US? Would it differ by culture? Slide20

SJ and collective action (Jost

et al., 2017)

Why do people choose or not to protest?

Social identity model of collective action (

Zomeren

,

Postmes

, & Spears, 2008)

Figure 1—what does it predict?

What does SJT add to this approach?

Becker & Wright (2011) benevolent sexism led to more SJ and less CA

Figure 7

How does this apply to recent examples of collective action?

Cichocka

&

Jost

(2014) footnote 3Slide21

Emotional contagion

Is emotional contagion automatic or controlled?

Emotional mimicry

Affective feedback

Facial feedback -- Pen in mouth study (

Strack

)

Vocal feedback

Postural feedback

What is new in the approach by

Wrobel

&

Imbir

, 2019? Slide22

Next week

Prejudice

Book chapters

Crandall &

Eshleman

, 2003 JSM

Barreto

& Ellmers, 2015. AESP (skim)

Gawronski

, 2019 on implicit