/
Son May 2017 Son May 2017

Son May 2017 - PowerPoint Presentation

karlyn-bohler
karlyn-bohler . @karlyn-bohler
Follow
405 views
Uploaded On 2017-09-10

Son May 2017 - PPT Presentation

Research strategy The current landscape EU research political agenda The Sustainable Development Goals The Norwegian research political agenda The White paper on ID: 586790

feedback applications groups research applications feedback research groups grade reader group applicant responsibles teams projects nfr plenary session leaders

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Son May 2017" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Son May 2017

Research

strategySlide2

The current landscape

EU

research

political

agenda

The

Sustainable

Development Goals

The Norwegian

research

political

agenda

The White

paper

on

Humanities

UiO,

faculty

and IMK

strategies

ImpactSlide3

Better and more targeted

applications

to

external financing schemesSlide4

Active follow

-up and

development

of the Phd-program to ensure

completionSlide5

Group discusion

scheme

Groups

discus

the

2 propositions/

applications

and

nominate

one

group

leader putting

comments

into

writing

for hand over

afterwards

to

applicant

responsibles

/teams

Groups

can

chose

where

to

discus

Groups

should

focus

on

«

what

would

make

the

proposition

even

better

and more

likely

to be

selected

» in

relation

to

the

call

Groups

should

be back for

plenary

session

at 10.45

In

plenary

session

: Group leaders present 1-2

key

findings

/

comment

and

can

pose 1

question

to

applicant

responsibles

/teams

Group leaders hand over all

the

writen

comments

to

applicant

responsibles

/teams Slide6

GroupsSlide7

Norwegian Research Council Fripro

Scheme

Panel

members

read

25 applications

each

All

applications

get

a «first» and «

second

»

reader

:

o

Firs

reader

:

detailed

feedback and grade all

review

categories

o

Second

reader

:

reads

first

reader´s

feedback and

give

overall feedback

o

Panel

meet

in September: NFR

informs

on

re-

submitted

applications

. First

reader

introduces

the

projects

/

applications

,

then

20 min

discusion

per

application

,

then

agreement

on

feedback and grade

o

Feedback is

short

(

requirement

from NFR); i.e.:

«

flawed

methodology

»

but

not «

what

the

flaws

are

».

o Feedback to «

justify

grade»,

rather

than

«

what

to

change

before

next

submission

»

o F

inal

comparison

of

all

projects

and ranking

of

the

high-rated

projects

Scientific

quality

/

merit

most

important

«

Originality

and

risky

» over «safe and

unexciting

»

«

Why

it is

important

«

Timely

» and «

urgency

» to make NFR understand

they

should

not «miss»

this

research

innovation

«

Wider

significance

and

the

ability

to

communicated

to

the

wider

non-

academic

audience

»:

crucial

;

without

this

it is

easily

a C-grade and

one

C-grade

could

lead to not

funded

Deliverables

/

milestones

;

can

be

internal

to

the

project

and/or

external

(

conferences

,

publications

)