/
Advanced Methods and Analysis for the Learning and Social Sciences Advanced Methods and Analysis for the Learning and Social Sciences

Advanced Methods and Analysis for the Learning and Social Sciences - PowerPoint Presentation

katrgolden
katrgolden . @katrgolden
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2020-08-05

Advanced Methods and Analysis for the Learning and Social Sciences - PPT Presentation

PSY505 Spring term 2012 February 22 2012 Todays Class MetaAnalysis MetaAnalysis What is it MetaAnalysis What is it usually used for MetaAnalysis What are the key challenges ID: 799468

analysis independence goodness skills independence analysis skills goodness detector evaluating combining meta correlation significance data conjunctive assumption ignoring key

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Advanced Methods and Analysis for the Le..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Advanced Methods and Analysis for the Learning and Social Sciences

PSY505

Spring term, 2012

February

22,

2012

Slide2

Today’s Class

Meta-Analysis

Slide3

Meta-Analysis

What is it?

Slide4

Meta-Analysis

What is it usually used for?

Slide5

Meta-Analysis

What are the key challenges?

Slide6

Meta-Analysis

What are the key challenges?

Lack of detail in reports (p<0.05)

Inconsistent reports (r, p, d/

s

)

File-drawer problem

Construct-name mapping

Slide7

Combining Significance

Stouffer’s Z

Z

sqrt

(K)

Slide8

Combining Significance

Stouffer’s Z

sum(Z)

sqrt

(sum(

Var

(Z))

2

)

Var

(Z)=1 because it’s the normal distribution

Slide9

What if you have p?

Slide10

What if you have t?

Slide11

What if you have r?

Slide12

Asgn. 5

Problems 1-3

Slide13

Weighting

When do R&R recommend weighting Z’s?

Is it a good idea?

Slide14

Key assumption

Independence between studies

When might this assumption be violated?

If independence not met, there are other tests that can be used

See chapter

Slide15

Combining Effect Size

Case of linear correlation r

Slide16

Combining Effect Size

Convert r to Fisher z (not the same as Z!)

Using a table or function

Why?

As correlation approaches 1 or -1, the distribution of correlation becomes non-normal

The 95% confidence interval for a correlation of 0.9 might include 1.1, but correlation can’t be greater than 1

Fisher z adjusts this to make all distributions normal, making it possible to integrate across correlations

Slide17

Combining Effect Size

Combine Fisher z

sum(z)

K

Slide18

Combining Effect Size

Convert Fisher z back to r

Slide19

Key assumption

Independence between studies

When might this assumption be violated?

If independence not met, there are other tests that can be used

See chapter

Slide20

What about d/s

Convert it to r

Then conduct meta-analysis on r

Different equations for this conversion depending on properties of the data set

For more info, see p. 239 of

Cooper, H., Hedges, L.V. (1994)

The Handbook of Research Synthesis.

Slide21

Cool thing

Same methods can be used to compare between significance values or correlations

Subtract values rather than summing them

Slide22

Example

What is the significance of each study?

What is the significance of the two studies?

What is the difference between the studies?

Z=1.9

,

Z=2.2

Z=1.9, Z= -0.5

Slide23

Evaluating detector goodness

Let’s do problem 4 together

Slide24

Evaluating detector goodness

How do we get an A’ from this data?

(ignoring non-independence)

Slide25

Evaluating detector goodness

How do we get SE(A’) from this data?

(ignoring non-independence)

Slide26

Evaluating detector goodness

How do we compare A’ to chance?

(ignoring non-independence)

Slide27

Evaluating detector goodness

Now, why was this the wrong thing to do?

(ignoring non-independence)

Slide28

Evaluating detector goodness

Re-doing the procedure accounting for independence

Compute A’ for each student

Compute Z for each student

Use Stouffer’s Z to integrate across students

Slide29

Evaluating detector goodness

When is this method inappropriate/useless?

Slide30

Cleaning the Registers

At this point, every student should have handed in three assignments

If you haven’t, come talk to me after class

You now need to do 3 of Assignments 6-10

Slide31

Asgn. 6

Slide32

Next Class

Monday,

February

27

3pm-5pm

AK232

Regression and

Regressors

Readings

Ramsey

, F.L., Schafer, D.W. (1997)

 The Statistical Sleuth: A Course in Methods of Data Analysis. 

Sections 7.2-7.4, 9.2-9.3, 10.2-10.3

Witten, I.H., Frank, E. (2005)

Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques.

 Sections 4.6, 6.5.

Assignments Due: 

6. Regression

Slide33

The End

Slide34

Bonus Slides

If there’s time

Slide35

BKT with Multiple Skills

Slide36

Conjunctive Model(

Pardos

et al., 2008)

The probability a student can answer an item with skills A and B is

P(CORR|A^B) = P(CORR|A) * P(CORR|B)

But how should credit or blame be assigned to the various skills?

Slide37

Koedinger et al.’s (2011)

Conjunctive Model

Equations for 2 skills

Slide38

Koedinger et al.’s (2011)

Conjunctive Model

Generalized equations

Slide39

Koedinger et al.’s (2011)

Conjunctive Model

Handles case where multiple skills apply to an item better than classical BKT

Slide40

Other BKT Extensions?

Additional parameters?

Additional states?

Slide41

Many others

Compensatory Multiple Skills (

Pardos

et al., 2008)

Clustered Skills

(Ritter et al., 2009)