Dinesh Rao MD Assistant Professor Department of Radiology Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville Disclosures I have no disclosures ID: 605200
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Imaging of Low Back Pain" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Imaging of Low Back Pain
Dinesh Rao MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Radiology
Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology
University of Florida College of Medicine - JacksonvilleSlide2
Disclosures
I have no disclosuresSlide3
Overview
Types of Low Back Pain (LBP)
Modalities of Imaging
Risks of Inappropriate Imaging
Review MRI/CT findings in patients with LBP with neurological symptomsSlide4
Low Back pain – 3 Types
Uncomplicated low back pain
Low back pain associated with neurological symptoms
Low back pain with “red flags”
Trauma, infection, tumor, acute neurological symptomsSlide5
Modalities of Imaging
Plain Film:
"
…
the value of a lumbar spine radiograph is to establish the presence of a spine.”
–
Michael Modic MDSlide6
Modalities of Imaging
CT
W
orkhorse
for
trauma
CT myelogram
P
roblem
solving (tumor, etc
.)
Surgical planningSlide7
Modalities of Imaging
MRI
–
for neurological symptoms
Myelopathy
–
spinal cord disease
Neurogenic claudication
–
canal stenosis below conus
Radiculopathy
–
after failed conservative treatment if patient is considering surgery or pain interventionSlide8
Uncomplicated Low Back Pain
Poorly understood, multifactorial
In young adults, likely related to weak core muscles, weight, bad posture, muscle strain
1
Usually self limiting with conservative treatment
1 Deyo RA, Weinstein JN. Low back pain. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:363–370Slide9
MRI for LBP is Inappropriate
Fewer than 1% of patients in primary care setting have “red flags”
1
Up to 38% of lu
m
bar MRI not indicated
2
Deyo
RA, Weinstein JN. Low back pain. N Engl J Med 2001;
344:363–370
Swedlow A, Johnson G, Smithline N, Milstein A. Increased costs and rates of use in the California workers’ compensation system as a result of self-referral by physicians.
N Engl J Med
. 1992;327:1502–6.Slide10
Risks of Inappropriate Imaging
Costs
Much higher costs with early imaging
Direct costs of scan
Up to 10x as much cost compared to conservative management and testing.
3
No difference in outcome between early MRI and usual care
4
3.
Joines JD, McNutt RA, Carey TS, et al. Finding cancer in primary care outpatients with low back pain: a comparison of diagnostic strategies. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16:14–23
4.
Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Turner JA, et al. Overtreating chronic back pain: time to back off? J Am Board Fam Med 2009;
22:62–68Slide11
Risks of Inappropriate Imaging
Increased rate of surgery
Lumbar MRI leads to more surgery without better outcome
2 times
more likely to have
surgery with plain film
5
8 times more likely to have surgery with MRI
6
5.
Jarvik JG, Hollingworth W, Martin B, et al. Rapid magnetic resonance imaging vs radiographs for patients with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;289;2810-2818.
6.
Webster BS, Cifuentes M. Relationship of early magnetic resonance imaging for work-related acute low back pain with disability and medical utilization outcomes. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52:900-907.Slide12
Risks of Inappropriate Imaging
False positives
–
57% of patients without back pain have a herniated disk
7
“Many imaging based degenerative features are likely part of normal aging and unassociated with pain.”
8
Degenerative changes correlate poorly with pain and disability
1
7.
Modic, M. T., Obuchowski, N. A., Ross, J. S., Brant-Zawadzki, M. N., Grooff, P. N., Mazanec, D. J., & Benzel, E. C. (2005). Acute low back pain and radiculopathy: MR imaging findings and their prognostic role and effect on outcome.
Radiology
,
237
(2), 597-604
.
8.
Brinjikji W, Luetmer PH, Comstock B, et al. Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations. AJNR. 2015
Apr;26(4):811-6
.
1.
Deyo RA, Weinstein JN. Low back pain. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:363–370Slide13
Risks of Inappropriate Imaging
Patient Labelling
–
patients become less happy with their
life
9
Longer work
disability and higher treatment costs
Increased fear and avoidance of
activities
10
9.
Sloan TJ, Walsh DA. Explanatory and diagnostic labels and perceived prognosis in chronic low back pain.
Spine
2010;35:E1120–5.
10.
Webster, BS, Bauer AZ, Choi YS. Iatrogenic Consequences of Early Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute, Work-Related, Disabling Low Back Pain. SPINE 2013 Volume 38, (22) 1939-1946 Slide14
LBP with Neurological Symptoms
Radiculopathy
Usually recover within a few weeks
Imaging useful for surgical or pain intervention in cases refractory to conservative treatment.
Neurogenic Claudication
–
chronic spinal stenosis
Cauda Equina
–
acute injury/stenosis
MyelopathySlide15
RadiculopathySlide16Slide17
1 month post opSlide18
1 year post opSlide19
Neurogenic ClaudicationSlide20
MyelopathySlide21
Low Back Pain with Red Flags
Trauma
Infection
Immunosuppresion
Suspicion/history of malignancy
AnticoagulationSlide22
Type 1 DJD
Radiologykey.comSlide23
Discitis/Osteomyelitis (bacterial)Slide24
Discitis/Osteomyelitis (atypical)Slide25
HemorrhageSlide26
TraumaSlide27
TumorSlide28
Summary
Plain film not useful
CT for trauma or specialized issue
MRI
“red flags”
Neurological symptoms possibly requiring surgery