/
NT Assignment NT Assignment

NT Assignment - PowerPoint Presentation

kittie-lecroy
kittie-lecroy . @kittie-lecroy
Follow
391 views
Uploaded On 2016-09-13

NT Assignment - PPT Presentation

Update 91713 NT Assignment Update Resources Company Resources BPA Rebecca Berdahl Milos Bosanac Ann Shintani Bob Zerfing Clark Brenna Moore EWEB Megan Capper Alex Swerzbin Seattle City Light ID: 465447

amp tier motions assignment tier amp assignment motions tiers nits bumping priority review update lot parking ptp items issues comparison scope service

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "NT Assignment" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

NT Assignment

Update: 9/17/13Slide2

NT Assignment Update

Resources:

Company

Resources

BPA

Rebecca Berdahl, Milos Bosanac,

Ann Shintani, Bob Zerfing

Clark

Brenna Moore

EWEB

Megan Capper, Alex Swerzbin

Seattle City Light

Robin Cross

SPP

Ken Quimby (NF Assignment)Slide3

NT Assignment Update

Review Scope

Key Issues

Comparison of NITS to PTP in Preemption and CompetitionReview of Motions and Parking LotSlide4

NT Assignment Update

Scope

Goals in Assignment Document:

Review NITS and provide a clear list of how any standards there will impact our current thinking/motions of how NT competes in the ST market.

Develop a matrix of motion revisions or new motions with columns for Pros and Cons from an NT perspective and a PTP perspective.

Identify conflicts with motions for NITS and propose new wording for any motions NT would like changed.

Proposed Scope:

Focus

on Tier 1 and Tier 3

bumping of lower priority tiers.

OATT section 2.2 is out of scope.

Develop a comparison between key P&C requirements for NITS

vs

PTP

Review parking lot & motions and identify any conflicts with respect

to administration of

Tier 1 & Tier

3 bumping

Prepare recommendations for bumping by

Tier 1 & Tier 3

Provide drafts for new

motions

to facilitate

Tier 1 &

Tier 3

bumping

Change name to

Tiers 1 & 3 Assignment

so that it includes Tier 1 LT Firm

& Native Load bumping

.Slide5

Tiers 1 & 3 Assignment Update

Key Issues

The following issues have been identified for further

review. Other issues may be identified.

Should NITS challengers be required to have a flat profile?

Should bumping be initiated when only partial service is available to the challenger?

Should there be any new or modified rules with respect to a

Tier 1 or Tier 3

customer bumping its

own lower

priority reservation?

Should there be any different rules with respect to selecting defenders?

For example, what

rules should apply to timing of bumping (e.g., should NITS be permitted to bump a lower priority reservation that has passed its start date

)?

Review WEQ-001-4.15 language in the first sentence to see if it needs to be revised to allow Tier 1 to processing priority over Tier 2.Slide6

Tiers 1 & 3 Assignment Update

Comparison of NITS to PTP in Preemption and Competition

(example)

ISSUE

NITS (excluding OATT 2.2)

PTP

ROFR

N/A

Only within

Tier 2

vs

Tier 2 or Tier 4

vs

Tier 4.

Matches evaluated on Duration, Price, and Queue (submission)

time

Bumping

(Non-ROFR)

Tier 1

vs

lower

priority tiers,

Tier 3

vs

lower priority tiers

Tier 1

vs

lower

priority tiers,

Tier 2

vs

Tier

2 requests and/or

lower priority tiers, Tier 4

vs

Tier

4 requests and/or

lower priority

tiers

Duration

Only used for response timing table & based on interval between start and stop (See Table 105-A). There are no

specified SERVICE_INCREMENTS

(e.g

., daily, weekly, monthly). Not applicable in NITS bumping.

Based on SERVICE_INCREMENT

and interval

between start and stop. SERVICE_INCREMENT defined as hourly, daily, weekly, monthly and yearly. Only applicable in Tier 2

vs

Tier 2 or Tier 4

vs

Tier 4.

Profiled requests

Included in the NITS

standards.

Permitted at Transmission

Provider option.Slide7

Tiers 1 & 3 Assignment Update

Review of Motions and Parking Lot

Motions and Parking Lot items will be reviewed to identify

Tier 1 & Tier 3

related concerns:

Items which are specific to ROFR do not apply.

Items which are identified as Short-Term Firm will be reviewed to see if they should be limited to Tier 2

vs

Tier 2 competitions.

Open items that are assigned to the NT Assignment will be addressed.

New motions may be prepared.

New parking lot items may be presented.Slide8

Tiers 1 & 3 Assignment Update

Timeline

October OASIS Subcommittee meeting

Complete review of assigned Motions and Parking Lot items

Prepare comparison chart of NITS

vs

PTP

May have some motions

OASIS Subcommittee guidance on outstanding issues

Finalize assignment at November OASIS Subcommittee meeting

Final

Tier 1 & Tier 3 Assignment recommendation

Draft

motions

Review of

P&C Recommendation

text