Update 91713 NT Assignment Update Resources Company Resources BPA Rebecca Berdahl Milos Bosanac Ann Shintani Bob Zerfing Clark Brenna Moore EWEB Megan Capper Alex Swerzbin Seattle City Light ID: 465447
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "NT Assignment" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
NT Assignment
Update: 9/17/13Slide2
NT Assignment Update
Resources:
Company
Resources
BPA
Rebecca Berdahl, Milos Bosanac,
Ann Shintani, Bob Zerfing
Clark
Brenna Moore
EWEB
Megan Capper, Alex Swerzbin
Seattle City Light
Robin Cross
SPP
Ken Quimby (NF Assignment)Slide3
NT Assignment Update
Review Scope
Key Issues
Comparison of NITS to PTP in Preemption and CompetitionReview of Motions and Parking LotSlide4
NT Assignment Update
Scope
Goals in Assignment Document:
Review NITS and provide a clear list of how any standards there will impact our current thinking/motions of how NT competes in the ST market.
Develop a matrix of motion revisions or new motions with columns for Pros and Cons from an NT perspective and a PTP perspective.
Identify conflicts with motions for NITS and propose new wording for any motions NT would like changed.
Proposed Scope:
Focus
on Tier 1 and Tier 3
bumping of lower priority tiers.
OATT section 2.2 is out of scope.
Develop a comparison between key P&C requirements for NITS
vs
PTP
Review parking lot & motions and identify any conflicts with respect
to administration of
Tier 1 & Tier
3 bumping
Prepare recommendations for bumping by
Tier 1 & Tier 3
Provide drafts for new
motions
to facilitate
Tier 1 &
Tier 3
bumping
Change name to
Tiers 1 & 3 Assignment
so that it includes Tier 1 LT Firm
& Native Load bumping
.Slide5
Tiers 1 & 3 Assignment Update
Key Issues
The following issues have been identified for further
review. Other issues may be identified.
Should NITS challengers be required to have a flat profile?
Should bumping be initiated when only partial service is available to the challenger?
Should there be any new or modified rules with respect to a
Tier 1 or Tier 3
customer bumping its
own lower
priority reservation?
Should there be any different rules with respect to selecting defenders?
For example, what
rules should apply to timing of bumping (e.g., should NITS be permitted to bump a lower priority reservation that has passed its start date
)?
Review WEQ-001-4.15 language in the first sentence to see if it needs to be revised to allow Tier 1 to processing priority over Tier 2.Slide6
Tiers 1 & 3 Assignment Update
Comparison of NITS to PTP in Preemption and Competition
(example)
ISSUE
NITS (excluding OATT 2.2)
PTP
ROFR
N/A
Only within
Tier 2
vs
Tier 2 or Tier 4
vs
Tier 4.
Matches evaluated on Duration, Price, and Queue (submission)
time
Bumping
(Non-ROFR)
Tier 1
vs
lower
priority tiers,
Tier 3
vs
lower priority tiers
Tier 1
vs
lower
priority tiers,
Tier 2
vs
Tier
2 requests and/or
lower priority tiers, Tier 4
vs
Tier
4 requests and/or
lower priority
tiers
Duration
Only used for response timing table & based on interval between start and stop (See Table 105-A). There are no
specified SERVICE_INCREMENTS
(e.g
., daily, weekly, monthly). Not applicable in NITS bumping.
Based on SERVICE_INCREMENT
and interval
between start and stop. SERVICE_INCREMENT defined as hourly, daily, weekly, monthly and yearly. Only applicable in Tier 2
vs
Tier 2 or Tier 4
vs
Tier 4.
Profiled requests
Included in the NITS
standards.
Permitted at Transmission
Provider option.Slide7
Tiers 1 & 3 Assignment Update
Review of Motions and Parking Lot
Motions and Parking Lot items will be reviewed to identify
Tier 1 & Tier 3
related concerns:
Items which are specific to ROFR do not apply.
Items which are identified as Short-Term Firm will be reviewed to see if they should be limited to Tier 2
vs
Tier 2 competitions.
Open items that are assigned to the NT Assignment will be addressed.
New motions may be prepared.
New parking lot items may be presented.Slide8
Tiers 1 & 3 Assignment Update
Timeline
October OASIS Subcommittee meeting
Complete review of assigned Motions and Parking Lot items
Prepare comparison chart of NITS
vs
PTP
May have some motions
OASIS Subcommittee guidance on outstanding issues
Finalize assignment at November OASIS Subcommittee meeting
Final
Tier 1 & Tier 3 Assignment recommendation
Draft
motions
Review of
P&C Recommendation
text