/
The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence - PowerPoint Presentation

kittie-lecroy
kittie-lecroy . @kittie-lecroy
Follow
401 views
Uploaded On 2016-04-20

The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence - PPT Presentation

Introduction Purpose Role and Impact of DD Full Fledge DD vs Red Flag DD Antitrust Issues Case Studies Questions Content 2 Introduction Purpose Role and Impact ID: 285384

red flag information diligence flag red diligence information fledge company role impact issuescase content studiesquestions target ddantitrust introductionpurpose ddfull

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The Value in a Red Flag Due Diligence" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

The Value in a Red Flag Due DiligenceSlide2

IntroductionPurpose, Role and Impact of DDFull Fledge

DD vs.

Red Flag DDAntitrust IssuesCase StudiesQuestions

Content

2Slide3

IntroductionPurpose, Role and Impact of DDFull

Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DDAntitrust IssuesCase Studies

Questions

Content

3Slide4

PanelistsMichael Belsley, Kirkland & Ellis, ChicagoDamian

Didden

, Wachtell, New YorkDavid G. Gibson, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, ChesterbrookGeorge Magera

, Federated Investors, Inc., PittsburghShaun

Rixon

,

Gategroup

,

ZurichModeratorUrs P. Gnos, Walder Wyss, Zurich

Introduction

4Slide5

IntroductionPurpose, Role and Impact of

DD

Full Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DDAntitrust Issues

Case StudiesQuestions

Content

5Slide6

Understanding the business of the targetIdentification of synergies, potentials, strengths and weaknessesIdentification of risks related to the target

Determination viability of the transaction

Determination of the ideal deal structure Determination of reps & warranties, covenants and indemnities Identification of third party consents and governmental approvals

(e.g. competition clearance)Evaluation of a fair price

Integration

Purpose

,

Role

and

Impact of DD

6Slide7

IntroductionPurpose, Role and Impact of DDFull

Fledge

DD vs. Red Flag DDAntitrust Issues

Case StudiesQuestions

Content

7Slide8

Full Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DDWhat

can/what cannot be achieved by a

Red Flag DDSignificant

regulatory

approvals

Significant customer consents

Financial statement accuracy

and

internal

controls

(e.g.,

revenue

/

expense confirmation, etc.)Significant liabilities (known, unknown, contingent, or other) (e.g., off-balance sheet items, guarantees, litigation, investigations, etc.)Significant integration concerns (e.g. labour law issues, integration issues)

Full Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DD (1)

8Slide9

Reasons to go for one or

the otherTime (trade-off against potential risks)

Deal structure (auction)

Public deal vs. private deal

Regulatory

approvals

/ third party

consentsCosts

(trade-off

against

potential

risks

)

Multiple

jurisdictions

DD

Scope

of DD (e.g. environmental, IP)Full Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DD (2)9Slide10

Reasons to go for one

or

the other (cont’)Target (e.g. regulated

enties)Limited Resources

New

business

line

vs. ancillary business

linePublic deal vs. private dealRisk

tolerance

Expectations

of

stakeholders

(e.g.

existing

private

equity investors)Trend?Full Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DD (3)10Slide11

IntroductionPurpose, Role and Impact of DDFull Fledge DD vs.

Red

Flag DDAntitrust IssuesCase StudiesQuestions

Content

11Slide12

Two facets regarding antitrust and diligence:Antitrust regulation of information sharing governs generally the kinds of information that can be shared during diligenceNeed

for information to discern antitrust-related regulatory concerns posed by the transaction

Antitrust

Issues

12Slide13

Agencies recognize that merger parties

reasonably need to exchange information for

valuation and

synergies

analysis

But,

Agencies are concerned

that competing

parties

activities

in

the

marketplace

become

tainted as a result.Hence limitations on information exchanged in diligence.Direction of information flow: Cash deal –one way, stock deal – two way.Non-public information such as pricing plans, customer lists

, nonpublic strategy, detailed product/vendor

costs

,

employee

comp.

can

pose

real

issues

When

this kind of information necessary, parties will use 3rd party (accounting or consulting firm) or clean teams

Antitrust and Information Sharing

13Slide14

Filings analysis: details on turnover, asset

info, and corporate structure to

determine where

filings

might

occurSubstantive analysis:

Does the

transaction

face

regulatory

intervention

,

and

what remedies? (Strategy documents, public documents, regulatory history, political sensitivity)Other risks: Beyond the transaction risk, for buyers, does the target

pose risk of cartel

enforcement

? (

Past

enforcement

,

industry

structure

,

other

sources

)Antitrust – Regulatory Risk Assessment14Slide15

IntroductionPurpose, Role and Impact

of

DDFull Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DDAntitrust

IssuesCase StudiesQuestions

Content

15Slide16

Issues:Can the Company use

the

information gained during the due diligence to

obtain a competitive advantage

over

its

competitors? Is it

the intention of

the

Company

to

simply

obtain

information

in an information gathering exercise or does it have a genuine desire to investigate the takeover (acting in good faith) and proceed (if no unacceptable risks arise)?Are there any

anti-trust issues? Any duty of care by

the

Company

or

by

the

Target

?

Is

this

exercise an efficient use of the Company’s ownership/resources?Does this extensive due diligence significantly reduce the risks for the

Company?Can the Company claim

that

the

Target

did

not

act in good faith and lied about its true position before the extensive due diligence unveiled the true position? Can the Target be compelled to pay the due diligence costs of the Company?Is a breakage fee possible? Would a red flag due diligence exercise have produced a more commercial solution?

Case Study 1 (see separate handout)

16Slide17

Issues:What facts might direct the Company to conduct a red flag diligence?What facts might direct the Company away from a red flag diligence toward a tradition in-depth diligence

review?

What other facts would be helpful to know before making a decision?How might a limited red flag diligence be helpful?  In what subject matter areas might a full diligence be warranted?How would a red

flag diligence operate in practice under this fact scenario?

What important information about the Target can neither

a

red flag

diligence nor a

full fledge diligence determine?

Case Study 2 (

see

separate

handout

)

17Slide18

IntroductionPurpose, Role and I

mpact

of DDFull Fledge DD vs. Red Flag DDAntitrust

IssuesCase StudiesQuestions

Content

18Slide19
Slide20