PPT-Tuning Basics INART 50 Science of Music

Three Fundamental Facts Frequency Pitch middle A is often 440 Hz but not necessarily Any pitch class can be duplicated by multiplying the frequency by 21 or 12 Musical intervals are associated with ratios multiply a given frequency by a given ratio traverse a given interval in pitch space. Presented . by:. . Rastislav Vajdák. . Senior Test Engineer. . . Oxymat. -Slovakia, s.r.o.. Fine tuning and setting PSA. OC input / output parameters. Tools. Start . o. f system to test . When and How to Improve Code Performance?. Ivaylo Bratoev. Telerik Corporation. www.telerik.com. Actual . vs. Perceived Performance. Example: . “Vista's file copy performance is noticeably worse than Windows XP” . CMOS. Advisor: Dr. . Adit D. Singh. Committee members: Dr. . Vishwani. D. . Agrawal. and Dr. . . Victor P. Nelson. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Masters P. roject . D. efense . Kadin Tseng. Boston University. Scientific Computing and Visualization. Log on with your BU userid and Kerboros . password . If you don’t have BU userid, then use this:. userid: . tuta1 . . . tuta18 . Photoinduced. Fields. L. C. Basset, F. . J. . . Heremans. , C. G. Yale, B. B. Buckley, and A. . Awschalom. PRL 107, 266403 (2011). Motivation. NV centers are sensitive to their local environment -> sample . Kevin Jamison. Brenda Bushell. Shih-Chieh Hsu. April 30, 2013. Register Test. 4/30/13. Further studies of the FEI3 TDAC tuning. Brenda Bushell Kevin Jamison. 2. Checks the connection of all the components involved in readout. Kadin Tseng. Boston University. Scientific Computing and Visualization. Outline. Introduction. Timing. Example Code. Profiling. Cache. Tuning. Parallel Performance. Code Tuning and Optimization. 2. Introduction. Daimeng Zhang, . Melissa . Trepanier. , Oleg . Mukhanov. ,. . Steven . M. Anlage. NSF-GOALI ECCS-1158644. Fall 2013 MRS Meeting. 2 December, 2013. Phys. Rev. X (in press); arXiv:1308.1410. Outline. Brief Introduction to Superconducting Metamaterials and SQUIDs. John H. . Yopp. , PhD. Strategic Partnerships, Tuning USA. David W. Marshall, PhD. Associate Director, Tuning USA. Presentation Goals. Discuss how the unique . f. eatures of U.S. higher education versus other national educational . The Tuning Process. Benefits of Tuning. Why Tuning is Different. What is Tuning?. A collaborative, faculty-driven . process that . “harmonizes” curricula around defining what a . student should know and be able to do in a chosen . Daimeng Zhang, . Melissa . Trepanier. , Oleg . Mukhanov. ,. . Steven . M. Anlage. NSF-GOALI ECCS-1158644. Fall 2013 MRS Meeting. 2 December, 2013. Phys. Rev. X (in press); arXiv:1308.1410. Outline. Brief Introduction to Superconducting Metamaterials and SQUIDs. Meeting of the. Indiana Commission for Higher Education. March 11, 2011. University Place Conference Center, IUPUI. 1. Broad Context for Discussion. Access. Completion/Competitiveness. Low graduation rates. process that identifies what a student should know and be able to do in a chosen . discipline at the completion of a degree by:. Defining areas of competency. Identifying learning outcomes. Scaling competencies and outcomes to degree level. Tim . Birtwistle. 2. Why ……………………….?. Tuning is a five step process comprised of: . defining the discipline core; . mapping employability; . surveying stakeholders; . honing core competencies and learning outcomes; .