M Casolino H Vincke S Roesler HSERP 1 11 th SHiP Collaboration Meeting 7 th June 2017 Outline General considerations Classification of the ventilation system Tritium production ID: 780348
Download The PPT/PDF document "Radiological protection studies" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Radiological protection studies
M. Casolino – H. Vincke – S. RoeslerHSE-RP
1
11
th
SHiP Collaboration Meeting
7
th
June 2017
Slide2Outline
General considerations
Classification of the ventilation system
Tritium
productionAir activation
Activation and radioactive waste
Energy deposition for the coil
New model for the magnetSummary
2
11
th
SHiP
Collaboration meeting
Slide3General considerations for the SHiP target complex
3
High prompt dose
in SHiP target area calls for adequate shielding around the target
Only
absolute
necessary equipment
should be installed in
“hot” areas Depending on residual dose and tasks,
manual interventions
should partially/completely be
replaced
by remote maintenance/repair
Air volumes to be minimized in ‘hot’ areas or to be replaced by He/vacuum environmentStatic confinement of air by physical barriers to separate air in contaminated areas from outsideDynamic confinement by a ventilation system guaranteeing a pressure cascade from low to high contaminated areas
Water cooling circuits for highly radioactive elements should be closed and separated from othersActivation and contamination of ground water and earth to be avoided
The design must consider minimization, decommissioning and dismantling of radioactive waste
Water and
Ground activation
Radioactive waste
Air and He
activation
Prompt and residual radiation
Radiation Protection
11
th
SHiP
Collaboration meeting
Slide44
11
th
SHiP Collaboration meeting
Water and
Ground activation
Radioactive waste
Air and He
activation
Prompt and residual radiation
Radiation Protection
FLUKA was used to evaluate the radiation protection requirements for the
SHiP
target complex
Slide5Tritium production
5A simplified geometry was used:
Target: one section of Mo, one section of W. No water cooling, no Ta cladding
Region between target and proximity shielding filled by
He
Proximity shielding and passive shielding in
Cast Iron
2m concrete thick walls around passive shielding
11
th
SHiP
Collaboration meeting
Air and He ActivationbeamH-3 has a very low radio-toxicity but it can be a radiation hazard when:inhaledingested via food or waterabsorbed through the skin
Slide6Tritium production
6Calculations performed assuming
5 years of operation 2*10
20
pot
11
th
SHiP Collaboration meeting
Air and He Activation
H-3 activity
Mo
10 TBq
W
8 TBqHe0.9 GBqCast Iron1 TBqConcrete2 MBq95% of H-3 is produced in the target, but most probably no outgassing into the helium vessel. Absorbed by the water (HTO form) and circulated in the water cooling system.While for the iron and concrete shielding outgassing calculation are in progress.
Slide7Air activation
7Geometry (v21) used:
Still
120cm long target
No Ta cladding, no gaps between He vessel and concrete
Scored particle fluence for air activation in the following regions:
Internal Helium volume
Middle Helium volumeExternal Helium volumeFirst Air volumeSecond Air volume
11
th
SHiP
Collaboration meeting
Air and He Activation
beamyz
Closed loop for purificationClosed loop for ventilation plus leaks? from He circuit
Slide8Air activation
8Calculations performed assuming
5 years operation
2 * 1020
pot
99.9% He purity
from He purification system
assumed 0.1% air contaminationFor the CA1 calculation:
Assumed a standard breathing rate (1.2 m
3
/h)
For the moment no leakage term
11
th SHiP Collaboration meetingAir and He ActivationActivity (
Bq)after 60 s coolingMultiple of CAAir in inner He5.6*1077.5*105Air in middle He7.8*105
1.3*103Air in external He1.5*1022*10-2First air volume1.7*10
7
0.7Second air volume8.3*1046.7*10-3Inner He
2.8*1090.42Middle He4.1*1078.7*10-4
External He9*1031.5*10-81 Person working 40h/w, 50w/y with standard breathing rate in air contaminated environment with CA = 1 receives 20 mSv.
Slide9Classification of the ventilation system
9The ventilation system requirements ( e.g. pressure cascades) are defined in the
ISO 17873:2004
Four classifications are possible
Accident case analysed
breakdown of He vessel
CA values calculated mixing the helium and the air of the closed loop
CA for accident ~ 2.6
Classification for the ventilation system:
C2
For flexibility for future installations could be classified as C3
Check on the inhaled dose ongoing
11th SHiP Collaboration meetingAir and He Activation
ClassificationDepression valuesDAC1 valuespermanent (accident)C1<60 Pa0 (<1)C280 to 100 Pa
<1 (<80)C3120 to 140 Pa<1 (<4000)C4220 to 300 Pa >1 (any)
1
Slightly different definition compared to CA
Slide1010
11
th
SHiP Collaboration meeting
Water and
Ground activation
Radioactive waste
Air and He
activation
Prompt and residual radiation
Radiation Protection
Slide11Waste production
11
Using geometry v21 with some modifications:
Including Ta cladding
Extended target to 150cm
Calculations performed assuming
5 years operation
2 * 1020
pot
Results presented in terms of
Design
Limits
(DL)
If DL > 1 the waste is radioactiveAfter 10 years of cooling DL > 1 for proximity and passive shielding in the He-vessel
11th SHiP Collaboration meetingRadioactive waste1 day of cooling1 month of cooling1 year of cooling10 years of cooling
DLDLDLDL
Slide12Waste production
12
Using geometry v21 with some modifications:
Including Ta cladding
Extended target to 150cm
Calculations performed assuming
5 years operation
2 * 1020
pot
Results presented in terms of
Design
Limits
(DL)
If DL > 1 the waste is radioactiveFloor below the target slightly radioactive, possibility to use movable blocks of concrete or iron.
11th SHiP Collaboration meetingRadioactive waste1 day of cooling1 month of cooling1 year of cooling10 years of cooling
DLDLDL
DL
Slide1313
Energy deposition for the coil
11
th
SHiP
Collaboration meeting
Using same geometry as for waste productionCalculations performed assuming 5 years operation 2 * 1020
pot
Beginning of the magnet assumed at the position y[150:180] – z [152.5-158]
Maximum dose ~50KGy
Slide1414
Integration of new SHiP magnet
11
th
SHiP
Collaboration meeting
GDML file imported in FlukaImproving the importing phase
Checks between Geant4 and Fluka
model ongoing
Some volumes in
Fluka
are approximated
Differences in volume can go up to 80% Magnetic field in place alreadyEven if with the above mentioned caveats particles are bent10 primaries on target
Slide1515
SummaryMany studies ongoing for the
radiation protection aspects for the SHiP experiment:
He and Air activation:
~95%
of H-3 is produced
into the target
outgassing studies for the shielding are in progressAir activation drives the classification of the ventilation system to C2
according to ISO17873:2004
Possibility to use C3 to have
flexibility
f
or future installations
after SHiP Waste production: Proximity and passive shielding will have DL > 1 even after 10y of coolingFloor below the target radioactive dismountable floor (iron or concrete) neededEnergy deposition:Maximum dose
received by the magnet in the new position ~50kGyIntegration of the new magnet ongoing:Improving GDML import11th SHiP
Collaboration meeting
Slide1616
Thank you for your attention
11
th
SHiP
Collaboration meeting
Slide1717
Backup
11
th
SHiP
Collaboration meeting