kinmunsingSAWHILECMATRIXxanoniwomanERGxukicornjovaxonucook3PSTDECLWhilesheisingsthewomanicookscorn2joniimanvua hainmunsingDSWHILECMATRIXxanonjwomanERGxukicornjovaxonucook ID: 849107
Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Switchreferenceasmultipleagreementwithcy..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
1 Switch-referenceasmultipleagreementwithc
Switch-referenceasmultipleagreementwithcyclicexpansionEmilyClemUniversityofCalifornia,BerkeleyMAD2018,11/08/181IntroductionSwitch-reference(SR;Jacobsen1967)offersaninterestingpuzzlefromtheperspectiveoflocalityinsyntacticoperationsAnelementindicates(non-)coreferenceofargumentsintwodifferentclausesThismarkerthusreectsfeaturesofDPsinitsownclauseandintheclausetowhichitattaches1(1)[jaa=xi3SG=NOMvua= kin]=munsing=SA.WHILE=CMATRIXxano=niwoman=ERGxukicornjova=xo=nucook=3.PST=DECL`Whilesheisings,thewomanicookscorn.'(2)[joniimanvua= hain]=munsing=DS.WHILE=CMATRIXxano=njwoman=ERGxukicornjova=xo=nucook=3.PST=DECL`Whilethemanisings,thewomanjcookscorn'Oneofthesimplestwaystocapturethistypeofpatternistoassumethatthecovaryingheadagreesdirectlywithbothrelevantarguments(ArregiandHanink,2018) IamgratefultomembersoftheAmahuacacommunityfortheircollaborationonthisproject.IalsothankAmyRoseDeal,LineMikkelsen,PeterJenks,DavidPesetsky,NorvinRichards,MarkBaker,andaudiencesatUCBerkeleyandNELS49forhelpfuldiscussionofthedataandanalysis.ThisworkwasmadepossiblebyfourOswaltEndangeredLanguageGrants.Allerrorsareminealone.1Thefollowingabbreviationsareusedinglossing:1=rstperson,3=thirdperson,AM=asso-ciatedmotion,C=complementizer,DECL=declarative,DS=differentsubject,EMPH=emphatic,ERG=ergative,GEN=genitive,IPFV=imperfective,NOM=nominative,OS=objectcoreferentialwithintransitivesubject,PL=plural,PRES=present,PST=past,SA=subjectcoreferentialwithtransitivesubject,SG=singular,SO=subjectcoreferentialwithobject,SS=subjectcoreferentialwithintransitivesubject,TR=transitive.ThisraisesquestionsaboutthedirectionalityandlocalityofAgreeIsAgreeupward,downward,orboth?HowcananelementinanadjunctclauseAgreeintoanotherclause?äIarguethatwecanprovideanAgree-basedaccountofSRwhilemain-tainingthatAgreeisalwaysunderc-commandandisalwayslocalCyclicAgree(Rezac,2003,2004;BéjarandRezac,2009):Aproberstprobesitsc-commanddomainIftheproberemainsunsatised,whentheheadreprojectstoformanintermediateproject
2 ion,theprobereprojectsaswellTheprobethe
ion,theprobereprojectsaswellTheprobethenprobesitsnew,expandedc-commanddomain(thespecierofthehead)Aclassicexampleofthisiswithagreeingv(3)vmax DmaxSUBJ v vmin DmaxOBJ 2 1UndertheassumptionsofBarePhraseStructure(BPS),thereisnoformaldistinctionbetweenthelabelofintermediateandmaximalprojectionsThepredictionofaCyclicAgreemodelcoupledwithBPSisthatmaximalprojectionsshouldbeabletoserveasprobesIarguethat,notonlyisthispredictionborneout,butitprovidesastraightforwardwaytoaccountforSRinthetypeofstructurein(4)1 Switch-referenceasmultipleagreementEmilyClem (4)X Cmax X Cmin Tmax 1 2Specically,IarguefortheexistenceofthisstructureinAmahuaca(Panoan;Peru)wheretheSRmarkerisanagreeingadjunctCAdjunctCminprobesDPsinitsc-commanddomain,theadjunctclauseBecausetheprobeonCremainsunsatised,Cmaxalsoprobesitsc-commanddomain,agreeingwithmatrixDPsäThus,theAmahuacadataprovidesupportformultipleAgreeviacyclicexpansionandsuggestthatmaximalprojectionscanserveasprobesRoadmap:§1:Introduction§2:AmahuacaagreeingC§3:Multipleagreementwithcyclicexpansion§4:Alternativeanalyses§5:Twotypesofmultipleagreement§6:Predictionsandtypology2AmahuacaagreeingCAmahuacaisanendangeredPanoanlanguagespokeninthePeruvianandBrazilianAmazonMostlyheadnal,withahead-initialmatrixCSOVwordorderwithscramblingofargumentsandadjunctsHeadanddependentmarkingTripartitealignmentwithergative,nominative,andaccusativecaseAlldatawerecollectedduringmyeldworkinSepahua,PeruoverfoureldtripsIntemporaladjunctclausesinAmahuacatheelementindicatingthetem-poralrelationshipbetweenclausesisanencliticthattypicallysurfacesontheverb(5)[jaa=xi3SG=NOMvua= xon]=munsing=SA.AFTER=CMATRIXxano=niwoman=ERGxukicornjova=xo=nucook=3.PST=DECL`Aftersheisang,thewomanicookedcorn.'Forsimplicity,thefocusonthistalkwillbeon`after'clauses,but`while'and`before'showsimilarbehavior2.1Internalsyntaxof`after'clausesAmahuaca`after'clausesarefullCPs,largeenoughtocontainallargu-mentsoftheverbs,aswellasadjunctsTheycancontainergative,(6),and
3 nominative,(7),subjects,aswellasobjects(
nominative,(7),subjects,aswellasobjects(6)[xano=niwoman=ERGchopaclothespatza= xon]wash=SA.AFTER=mun=CMATRIXproihatzamaniocjova=hi=ki=nucook=IPFV=3.PRES=DECL`Afterthewomaniwashedclothes,sheiiscookingmanioc.(7)[kiyoo-vi=nixiall-EMPH=NOMnokoo= xon]arrive=SA.AFTER=mun=CMATRIXproihatzamaniocjova=kan=xo=nucook=3PL=3.PST=DECL`Aftereveryoneiarrived,theyicookedmanioc.'2 Switch-referenceasmultipleagreementEmilyClem Theycancontainadverbs(8)[proikoshiquicklyka= xon]go=SA.AFTER=mun=CMATRIXxano=niwoman=ERGhatzamaniocvana=xo=nuplant=3.PST=DECL`Aftersheiwentquickly,thewomaniplantedmanioc.'(9)[mohaalreadyxano=xiwoman=NOMnokoo= xon]arrive=SA.AFTER=mun=CMATRIXjato=ni3PL=ERGhatzayucaxoka=kan=xo=nupeel=3PL=3.PST=DECL`Afterthewomenihadalreadyarrived,theyipeeledyuca.'TheycancontainotheradjunctCPs(10)[[proikariyamchoka= xon]wash=SA.AFTERproihatzamaniocxoka= xon]peel=SA.AFTER=mun=CMATRIXxano=niwoman=ERGxukicornjova=xo=nucook=3.PST=DECL`[Aftersheipeeledmanioc[aftersheiwashedyams]],thewomanicookedcorn.'(alternatively,`Thewomanwashedyams,peeledmanioc,andcookedcorn.')`After'clausesalsoallowclause-internalscrambling(11)`AfterIcookedpaca,Ipeeledmanioc.'a.SOV`after'clause[hiya=n1SG=ERGhanopacajova= xon]cook=SA.AFTER=mun=CMATRIXhun1SGhatzamaniocvuro=ku=nupeel=1.PST=DECLb.OSV`after'clause[hanopacahiya=n1SG=ERGjova= xon]cook=SA.AFTER=mun=CMATRIXhun1SGhatzamaniocvuro=ku=nupeel=1.PST=DECL2.2Externalsyntaxof`after'clauses`After'clausestypicallyappearinhighperipheralpositionsItisungrammaticalfor`after'clausestoappearbelowaspectmarking(Notethatnominalizedinternally-headedrelativeclausescanappearinthisposition)(12)`Aftersheisang,thewomaniiswashingmanioc.'a.[proivua= xon]=munsing=SA.AFTER=CMATRIXxano=niwoman=ERGhatzamaniocchoka=hi=ki=nuwash=IPFV=3.PRES=DECLb.xano=ni=munwoman=ERG=CMATRIXhatzamaniocchoka=hi=ki=nuwash=IPFV=3.PRES=DECL[proivua= xon]sing=SA.AFTERc.*xano=ni=munwoman=ERG=CMATRIXhatzamaniocchoka=hiwash=IPFV[proivua= xon]=ki=nusing=SA.AFTER=3.PRES=DECL`After'clausesdonotr
4 econstructbelowmatrixargumentsforConditi
econstructbelowmatrixargumentsforConditionC:regardlessoftherelativepositionofmatrixandadjunctmaterial,aCon-ditionCviolationisnevertriggered(13)`AfterMariaiwentquickly,sheiwashedclothes.'a.[proikoshiquicklyka= xon]=mungo=SA.AFTER=CMATRIXMaria=niMaria=ERGchopaclothespatza=xo=nuwash=3.PST=DECLb.[MariaiMariakoshiquicklyka= xon]=mungo=SA.AFTER=CMATRIXproichopaclothespatza=xo=nuwash=3.PST=DECLc.jaa=ni=mun3SG=ERG=CMATRIX[MariaiMariakoshiquicklyka= xon]go=SA.AFTERchopaclothespatza=xo=nuwash=3.PST=DECL3 Switch-referenceasmultipleagreementEmilyClem Theproposedsyntaxforthese`after'clausesisasgivenin(14)(14)Tmax Cmax T DmaxSUBJ T ... Tmin Tmax Cmin`after' DmaxSUBJ T ... Tmin DmaxOBJ v DmaxOBJ v 2.3Agreementin`after'clausesThereareseveraldifferentformsoftheencliticusedtomean`after'Thesemorphemesvarydependingoncoreferencerelationshipsbe-tweenarguments(Sparing-Chávez,1998,2012)Ifthereiscoreferencebetweenanargumentintheadjunctclauseandoneinthematrixclause,theformofthemorphemeissensitivetotheabstractcaseoftherelevantargumentsIn(15),theadjunctclausesubjectiscoreferentialwithamatrixtran-sitivesubject(ERG),andtheagreeingadjunctCtakestheform=xon(15)[jaa=xi3SG=NOMvua= xon]=munsing=SA.AFTER=CMATRIXxano=niwoman=ERGxukicornjova=xo=nucook=3.PST=DECL`Aftersheisang,thewomanicookedcorn.'In(16),theadjunctclausesubjectiscoreferentialwithamatrixin-transitivesubject(abstractNOM),andtheagreeingadjunctCtakestheform=hax(16)[jaa=xi3SG=NOMvua= hax]=munsing=SS.AFTER=CMATRIXxanoiwomanchirin=xo=nudance=3.PST=DECL`Aftersheisang,thewomanidanced.'In(17),theadjunctclausesubjectiscoreferentialwithamatrixobject(abstractACC),andtheagreeingadjunctCtakestheform=xo(17)[jaa=xi3SG=NOMvua= xo]=munsing=SO.AFTER=CMATRIXhinandog.ERGxanoiwomanchivan-vo=xo=nuchase-AM=3.PST=DECL`Aftersheisang,thedogchasedthewomani.'In(18),noadjunctclauseDPiscoreferentialwithanymatrixDP,andadjunctCisspelledoutasthedifferentsubjectmarker=kun(18)[joniimanvua= kun]=munsing=DS.AFTER=CMATRIXxanojwomanchirin=xo=nudance
5 =3.PST=DECL`Afterthemanisang,thewomanjda
=3.PST=DECL`Afterthemanisang,thewomanjdanced.'Thefullparadigmof`after'morphemesisgivenin(19)(19)`After'markers Matrix S A O Adjunct S =hax =xon =xo A O =ha =kun IthasbeennotedthatSRsharesmanysimilaritieswithcomplementizeragreementandcanpotentiallybeanalyzedasinvolvinganagreeingcom-plementizer(Watanabe,2000;ArregiandHanink,2018)TheAmahuacapatternlookslikecomplementizeragreementthatissen-sitivetoreferentialindexandabstractcase4 Switch-referenceasmultipleagreementEmilyClem äInterestingly,theagreeingcomplementizerissensitivetofeaturesofDPsinitsownclauseandtheclausetowhichCmaxisadjoined3MultipleagreementwithcyclicexpansionCyclicAgreecoupledwithBPS(Rezac,2003)predictsthatanunsatisedprobeshouldbeabletoprobethec-commanddomainofitsmaximalpro-jectionäIarguethatthepatternofagreeingadjunctCinAmahuacaisderivedviathistypeofcyclicexpansionoftheprobe'sdomainTheingredients:1.BarePhraseStructure(Chomsky,1995)Thereisnoformaldistinctionbetweenintermediateandmaxi-malprojections2.Cyclicexpansion(Rezac,2003,2004;BéjarandRezac,2009)Whenalabelreprojects,anunsatisedprobeassociatedwithitmayreprojectProbereprojectionservestoexpandthec-commanddomainoftheprobeandthustheagreementpossibilities3.Probeinsatiability(Deal,2015)Aprobe'sinteractionconditionscandifferfromitssatisfactionconditionsIfaprobelackssatisfactionconditions,itwillcontinueprob-ingallpossiblegoalsinitsc-commanddomainuntilreachingaphaseboundaryAdjunctCinAmahuacaisaninsatiableprobeFirst,Cminprobesitsc-commanddomain,whichcontainsthesubjectandobjectoftheadjunctclauseNotethatevidencefromremnantVP-frontingsuggeststhatobjectsundergoshifttoSpec,vP(Clem,2018b)(20)Agreementinsidetheadjunctclause Tmax Cmin DmaxSUBJ ... Tmin DmaxOBJ ... GiventhatC'sprobeisinsatiable,itremainsunsatisedafterprobingthec-commanddomainofCminWhenCreprojectstoformamaximalprojection,theprobeisreprojectedaswellandcanprobeagainThec-commanddomainofthisnewsegmentofC,Cmax,containsthema-trixsubjectandobject,keepingwiththeevidencefromC
6 onditionC(21)Agreementintothematrixclaus
onditionC(21)AgreementintothematrixclauseTmax Cmax T DmaxSUBJ ... Tmin Tmax Cmin DmaxSUBJ ... Tmin DmaxOBJ ... DmaxOBJ ... TheprobeonCagreesin:Referentialindices(modeledas-features;Rezac2004)Abstractcasefeatures5 Switch-referenceasmultipleagreementEmilyClem IftwoDPsthatCagreeswithshareareferentialindex,oneofthecorefer-encemarkerswillbeinsertedTheformofthemarkerwillbedeterminedbythecaseofthecoref-erentialDPsIfnoDPsshareareferentialindex,thedefaultdifferentsubjectmarkerwillbeinsertedSamplevocabularyitemsaregivenin(22)2(22)`After'vocabularyitems[[AFTER,[i,NOM*]][i,NOM]]Ø/hax/[[AFTER,[i,NOM*]][i,ERG]]Ø/xon/[AFTER]Ø/kun/4AlternativeanalysesTheaccountoutlinedherebuildsontheinsightofWatanabe(2000)thatSRsharesmanysimilaritieswithcomplementizeragreement(CA)Oneadvantageofthecurrentaccountisitssimplicitythereareindepen-dentargumentsforallofthenecessarytechnologyCyclicityinAgree(Rezac,2003;BéjarandRezac,2009)Probeinsatiability(Deal,2015)Treatingindicesas-features(Rezac,2004)Additionally,previousaccountsofSRand/orCAfaceempiricalchal-lengesgiventheAmahuacadata4.1Non-reference-trackingaccountsofSRSomerecentanalysesofSRassumethatreferencetrackingisnotinvolvedGeorgi(2012)arguesthatsamesubjectmarkingisaspecialcaseofcontrol 2WhatIlabelhereNOM*isafeaturethatiscommontoallembeddedsubjects,nominativeorergative.GivenindependentevidencefromcaseassignmentinAmahuaca(Clem,2018b),agoodcandidateforthisfeatureisa[T]featurethatindicatesagreementwithT.Keine(2012,2013)arguesthatSRreectscoordinationheight,withsamesubjectclausesbeingVPcoordinationBothoftheseaccountspredictthataclausebearingasamesubjectmarkershouldbeunabletohostanovertsubjectDP(Clem,2018a)InAmahuaca,`after'clausescanhostallargumentsoftheverbovertly,includingcase-markedsubjects(23)[mohaalreadyxano=xiwoman=NOMnokoo= xon]=munarrive=SA.AFTER=CMATRIXjato=ni3PL=ERGhatzayucaxoka=kan=xo=nupeel=3PL=3.PST=DECL`Afterthewomeniarrived,theyipeeledyuca.'4.2AccountsofSRparasiticonagreeingTSomedirectreferenc
7 e-trackingaccountsofSRassumethatSRispara
e-trackingaccountsofSRassumethatSRisparasiticonagreementonT(Finer,1984,1985;Watanabe,2000;Camacho,2010)TheseaccountspositsubjectagreementonTwhichisinterpretedasSRthroughsomemechanismattheCPlevelTheseaccounts(sometimesexplicitly)ruleoutobjecttrackingsincetheprobeonTisassumedtoonlyagreewiththesubjectTheseaccountscannotstraightforwardlycapturetheAmahuacapatterninwhichCcanshowagreementwithboththematrixandadjunctobject(24)[jaa=xi3SG=NOMvua= xo]=munsing=SO.AFTER=CMATRIXhinandog.ERGxanoiwomanchivan-vo=xo=nuchase-AM=3.PST=DECL`Aftersheisang,thedogchasedthewomani.'(25)[joni=nman=ERGhinoidoghiin= ha]=munsee=OS.AFTER=CMATRIXproikoshiquicklyka=hi=ki=nugo=IPFV=3.PRES=DECL`Afterthemansawthedogi,itiisrunning.'6 Switch-referenceasmultipleagreementEmilyClem IfweweretoallowtheprobeonTtobeinsatiable,thiscouldaccommo-dateobjecttrackingHowever,thisishardtoreconcilewiththeattestedagreementonAmahuacaTAmahuacatensemarkersindicatethepersonofthesubjectThepersonoftheobjectisneverindicatedonTSinceAmahuacaTneverinectsforobjectperson,themorestraightfor-wardassumptionisthatTandCprobeseparately(HaegemanandvanKoppen,2012)T'sprobeissatisedbyany-features(italwaysagreeswiththehighestDP)C'sprobehasnosatisfactionconditions(i.e.itisinsatiable;itagreeswithallDPsinitsc-commanddomain)AnadditionalissuewiththeaccountsofFiner(1984,1985)andWatanabe(2000)isthattheyrequireamechanismofbindingbetweenmatrixandadjunctCwhichisotherwiseunnecessary4.3BoundanaphoraccountsofCAPatternsofupward-orientedCAhavebeenarguedtoinvolvelocalagree-mentbetweenCandaboundanaphorinitsspecier(Diercks,2013)WecouldimaginethatSRasatypeofdownward-and-upward-orientedCAmayinvolveagreementwithaDPargumentintheadjunctclauseandaboundanaphorinthespecieroftheadjunctCPHowever,thistypeofaccountisinconsistentwiththeAmahuacadataThereisnodistributionalevidencethatsuggestsadjunctCPsbeginlowenoughinthestructuretoallowbindingofananaphorEvenifadjunctCPsbeganlowandobligatorilymovedhigher,theydonotreconstructforConditi
8 onC,(26)(26)[Floria=niFloria=ERGMariajMa
onC,(26)(26)[Floria=niFloria=ERGMariajMariahiin= xo]=munsee=SO.AFTER=CMATRIXMaria=njMaria=ERGFloriaiFloriachivan-vo=xo=nuchase-AM=3.PST=DECL`AfterFloriaisawMariaj,MariajchasedFloriai.'IfthereisnoreconstructionforConditionC,itisunclearhowtherecouldsimultaneouslybereconstructionforanaphorbindingAnadditionalpotentialissuewiththisstyleofaccountliesinthenatureoftheagreementrelationshipbetweenCandtheanaphorIftheanaphorisinSpec,CP,purelydownwardAgreerequiressomeadditionalmechanismtoderiveSpec-HeadagreementOneproposalforhowtosubsumeSpec-HeadagreementunderageneraltheoryofdownwardAgreeisthroughcyclicexpansionIfCyclicAgreeisassumed,wewouldneedsomestipulationtoruleoutthepossibilityofadjunctCmaxcontinuingtoprobe(27)Tmax Cmax T anaphor C Tmax Cmin DmaxSUBJ ... Tmin DmaxOBJ ... 7 Switch-referenceasmultipleagreementEmilyClem 5TwotypesofmultipleagreementThetypeofmultipleagreement(MA)activeinderivingthebasicpatternofSRmarkingiswhatIwillcall'Type1MA'Type1MA:AsingleprobeinteractswithmultiplegoalsInthecaseofAmahuaca,theprobeonadjunctCinteractswithDPgoalsinitsownclauseandintheclausetowhichitisadjoinedTheAmahuacaSRsystemsalsoprovidesevidenceforasecondtypeofMA,Type2MAType2MA:AsinglegoalinteractswithmultipleprobesTherearetwophenomenathatprovideevidenceforType2MAinAmahuaca-agreementonTNestedSRclauses5.1MAin-agreementonTAmahuacamatrixTshows-agreementcontrolledbythesubject(28)hiya=x=mun1SG=NOM=CMATRIXhun1SGrakuu=ku =nube.afraid=1.PST=DECL`Iwasafraid.'(29)vaku=x=munchild=NOM=CMATRIXrakuu=xo =nube.afraid=3.PST=DECL`Thechildwasafraid.'Anargumentthatiscross-referencedbySRmorphologycanalsoserveasthecontrollerfor-agreementonT(30)[hiya=n1SG=ERGhanopacajova= xon]=muncook=SA.AFTER=CMATRIXhun1SGhatzamaniocvuro=ku =nupeel=1.PST=DECL`AfterIcookedpaca,Ipeeledmanioc.'(31)[MariaiMariakoshiquicklyka= xon]=mungo=SA.AFTER=CMATRIXproichopaclothespatza=xo =nuwash=3.PST=DECL`AfterMariaiwentquickly,sheiwashedclothes.'äThissuggeststhesameDPcanbetargetedbymultipleprobesforAgre
9 e5.2MAinnestedSRclauseSRadjunctclausesi
e5.2MAinnestedSRclauseSRadjunctclausesinAmahuacacanappearin`clausechains',withnogrammaticallimitonthenumberofclausesWhenmultipleadjunctclausesoccurwithasinglemainclause,theycanexhibitastacked,(32),ornested,(33),structure(32)Tmax Cmax T Cmax T (33)Tmax Cmax T Tmax Cmin Cmax T 8 Switch-referenceasmultipleagreementEmilyClem In(34),thetwoadjunctclausesarestacked,andtheSRmarkercross-referencesthematrixsubjectinbothadjunctclauses(34)[hiya=ni1SG=ERGhatzamaniocvana= kin]=munplant=SA.WHILE=CMATRIX[Maria=njMaria=ERGhun1SG.GENvakuchildjiri= kun]feed=DS.AFTERhiya=ni1SG=ERGrivialsojan3SG.GENvakuchildjiri=hifeed=IPFVhun=ka=nu1SG=1.PRES=DECL`[WhileIplantmanioc]I,too,amfeedingherkids,[afterMariafedmykids].'(alternatively,`Mariafedmykids,sowhileIplantmanioc,I,too,amfeedingherkids.')In(35),thetwoadjunctclausesarenestedTheSRmarkerintheloweradjunctclausecross-referencesthesub-jectofthehigheradjunctclauseTheSRmarkerinthehigheradjunctclausecross-referencesthesub-jectofthematrixclause(35)[[hiya=ni1SG=ERGhun1SGhatzamaniocvana= hain]plant=DS.WHILEMaria=njMaria=ERGhun1SG.GENvakuchildjiri= kun]=munfeed=DS.AFTER=CMATRIXhiya=ni1SG=ERGrivialsojan3SG.GENvakuchildjiri=hifeed=IPFVhun=ka=nu1SG=1.PRES=DECL`[AfterMariafedmykids[whileIplantedmanioc]],I,too,amfeed-ingherkids.'(alternatively,'WhileIplantedmanioc,Mariafedmykids,soI,too,amfeedingherkids.')Innestedsame-subjectstructures,thesubjectofthehigheradjunctclausewillbeagoalofAgreefortheCthatisadjoinedtoitsclauseaswellasfortheCofitsownclause(36)[[proikariyamchoka= xon]wash=SA.AFTERproihatzamaniocxoka= xon]=munpeel=SA.AFTER=CMATRIXxano=niwoman=ERGxukicornjova=xo=nucook=3.PST=DECL`[Aftersheipeeledmanioc[aftersheiwashedyams]],thewomanicookedcorn.'(alternatively,`Thewomanwashedyams,peeledmanioc,andcookedcorn.')(37)Tmax Cmax T Tmax Cmin Cmax T DmaxSUBJ peelmanioc Tmax Cmin DmaxSUBJ washyams äThus,theabilityofSRclausestooccurinnestedstructuresisafurtherpieceofevidenceforType2MA6PredictionsandtypologyäSRcanbeaccountedforwithexis
10 tingAgreetechnologyOnequestionwemightas
tingAgreetechnologyOnequestionwemightaskiswhythemajorityoflanguageswithSRonlyallowtrackingofsubjectsThecurrentaccountsuggestsseveralpossibilitiesforhowsuchsystemscouldarise9 Switch-referenceasmultipleagreementEmilyClem 1.NoobjectshiftInAmahuaca,objectshiftallowstheobjecttoescapethevPphaseandbeaccessibletoC'sprobeIfalanguagelacksobjectshift,CwillbeunabletoagreewithobjectDPs,resultinginasubject-onlytrackingpattern2.CasediscriminatingprobeItispossiblethatinalanguagewithaccusativealignmenttheprobeonCiscase-discriminating,agreeingonlywithnomina-tiveDPsThiswouldallowforsubject-onlytrackingeveninalanguagewithobjectshift3.SyncretismItispossiblethatalanguagecouldhaveaprobeonCthatagreeswithobjectsbutlackdedicatedmorphologytospelloutanobjectcoreferencerelationshipEvidencethatmorphologicalsyncretismmaybearelevantfac-torcomesfromcomparingtheparadigmsofdifferenttemporaladjunctCsinAmahuacaEvenwithinasinglelanguage,differentparadigmshavediffer-ingdegreesofsyncretismwithrespecttothemorphologyavail-abletoindicateobjectcoreference(38)a.`After'series Matrix S A O Adjunct S =hax =xon =xo A O =ha =kun b.`While'series Matrix S A O Adjunct S =hi =kin =haito A O =hain c.`Before'series Matrix S A O Adjunct S =katzi/ =xankin A =xanni O =non äCyclicexpansionallowsmaximalprojectionstoserveasprobesAquestionwemightaskiswhywedon'tseemoreinstancesofmaximalprojectionsservingasprobesWithmanycommonprobes(v,T,complementC),thec-commanddomainofthemaximalprojectiononlycontainstheheadthatselectsit,whichusuallywillnothavethecorrecttypeoffeaturesWithadjunctC,thispatternmayactuallybequitewellattestedgiventhatSRsystemsarerelativelycommon10 Switch-referenceasmultipleagreementEmilyClem ReferencesArregi,Karlos,andEmilyHanink.2018.SwitchreferenceinWashoasmultiplesubjectagreement.ToappearintheProceedingsofNELS48.Béjar,Susana,andMilanRezac.2009.CyclicAgree.LinguisticInquiry40:3573.Camacho,José.2010.Oncaseconcord:Thesyntaxofswitch-referenceclauses.NaturalLanguage&LinguisticTheory28:
11 239274.Chomsky,Noam.1995.Theminimalistp
239274.Chomsky,Noam.1995.Theminimalistprogram.Cambridge,MA:MITPress.Clem,Emily.2018a.Againstnon-reference-trackingtheoriesofswitch-reference.ProceedingsoftheLinguisticSocietyofAmerica3:29:19.Clem,Emily.2018b.AmahuacaergativeasagreementwithmultipleheadsToappear,NaturalLanguage&LinguisticTheory.Deal,AmyRose.2015.Interactionandsatisfactionin-agreement.Talkhand-out.Diercks,Michael.2013.IndirectagreeinLubukusucomplementizeragree-ment.NaturalLanguage&LinguisticTheory31:357407.Finer,DanielL.1984.Theformalgrammarofswitch-reference.DoctoralDis-sertation,UniversityofMassachusetts,Amherst.Finer,DanielL.1985.Thesyntaxofswitch-reference.LinguisticInquiry16:3555.Georgi,Doreen.2012.Switch-referencebymovement.InPerspectivesonswitch-reference:Localmodelingandempiricaldistribution,ed.PhilippWeisser,140.Leipzig:InstitutefürLinguistik,UniversitätLeipzig.Haegeman,Liliane,andMarjovanKoppen.2012.ComplementizeragreementandtherelationbetweenC0andT0.LinguisticInquiry43:441454.Jacobsen,WilliamH.1967.Switch-referenceinHokan-Coahuiltecan.InStudiesinSouth-Westernethnolinguistics,ed.DellH.HymesandWilliamE.Bittle,238263.TheHague:Mouton.Keine,Stefan.2012.Switch-referenceascoordination.InPerspectivesonswitch-reference:Localmodelingandempiricaldistribution,ed.PhilippWeisser,107164.Leipzig:InstitutefürLinguistik,UniversitätLeipzig.Keine,Stefan.2013.Deconstructingswitch-reference.NaturalLanguage&Lin-guisticTheory31:767826.Rezac,Milan.2003.ThenestructureofcyclicAgree.Syntax6:156182.Rezac,Milan.2004.Elementsofcyclicsyntax:Agreeandmerge.DoctoralDissertation,UniversityofToronto.Sparing-Chávez,Margarethe.1998.InterclausalreferenceinAmahuaca.InHandbookofAmazonianlanguages,ed.DesmondC.DerbyshireandGeof-freyK.Pullum,volume4,443485.Berlin:MoutondeGruyter.Sparing-Chávez,Margarethe.2012.AspectsofAmahuacagrammar:Anendan-geredlanguageoftheAmazonbasin.Dallas:SILInternational.Watanabe,Akira.2000.Featurecopyingandbinding:Evidencefromcomple-mentizeragreementandswitchreference.Syntax3: