/
 Audit techniques guide (  Audit techniques guide (

Audit techniques guide ( - PowerPoint Presentation

liane-varnes
liane-varnes . @liane-varnes
Follow
344 views
Uploaded On 2020-04-03

Audit techniques guide ( - PPT Presentation

atg Travis Mlodzik CCSP Agenda Cost Segregation Milestones Chapter Dive Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Legal Framework Chapter 3 Cost Segregation Approaches Chapter 4 Principal Elements of Cost ID: 774832

amp chapter property cost amp chapter property cost years depreciation 1245 system electrical recovery costs segregation 1250 tax equipment

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document " Audit techniques guide (" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Audit techniques guide (atg)

Travis Mlodzik, CCSP

Slide2

Agenda

Cost Segregation Milestones

Chapter Dive

Chapter 1 – Introduction

Chapter 2 – Legal Framework

Chapter 3 – Cost Segregation Approaches

Chapter 4 – Principal Elements of Cost

Seg

Study & Report

Chapter 5 – Review & Examination of Cost

Seg

Study

Chapter 6 – Special Topics

Chapter 7 – Industry Specific Guidance

Chapter 8 – Issue Specific Guidance

Items Outdated – last revision in 2016

ASCSP & the ATG

Questions?

Slide3

Cost Segregation milestones

Hospital Corporation of America v. Commissioner (HCA)

Landmark case for cost segregation

1999 – Treasury

Regs

§1.446-1

Cost

seg

study considered a change in accounting method

1999 – AOD CC-1999-008

IRS acquiesced to validity of method approved in HCA case

pre-1981 ITC tests remained applicable for determining tangible personal property under ACRS & MACRS

Cost Segregation is acceptable

2004 – Audit Techniques Guide (ATG) Released

Continually monitored & updated with new law

Latest revision in 2016

Slide4

Chapter 1 - introduction

Can the ATG be cited as authority?

No, developed to assist IRS examiners when reviewing/examining cost

seg

studies

Purpose of the Cost

Seg

ATG

Why cost

seg

studies are performed for Federal income tax

How they are prepared

What to look for in review & examination

When issues need further examination

Reason for cost studies

Allocate building costs to §1250 & §1245 property

§1250 – real property (39-year or 27.5- year)

§1245 – tangible personal property (5 or 7 years)

Slide5

Chapter 2 – Legal Framework

History of Depreciation

Present income tax system began in 1913

For 20 years, taxpayers had freedom to determine depreciation allowances

Bulletin “F” – first issued in 1920; defined depreciation

1931 – revised and released first schedule of suggested lives

1942 – revised again & provided useful life guide for various types of property based on taxpayers business or industry

Also described two procedures to compute depreciation

Composite Method: rates of depreciation corresponding to useful lives ranging from 28.5 to 66.7 years

Component Method: depreciate building separate from equipment; structures range from 50 to 75 years while equipment ranges from 5 to 25 years

Accelerated Cost Recovery System (ACRS)

1981 – simplify depreciation rules & stimulate the economy

Allow greater deductions over shorter periods of time

Prohibited Component Depreciation

Applicable to property placed-in-service between 1981 & 1986

Slide6

Chapter 2 – Legal Framework cont.

Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS)

Current depreciation system

General Depreciation System (GDS) & Alternative Depreciation System (ADS)

Cost recovery now based on applicable depreciation method, recovery period & convention

Class lives are set forth in Rev. Proc. 87-56

Asset category (00.11 through 00.4) versus Activity category (01.1 through 80.0)

Incentives for cost segregation & cost recovery

Bonus Depreciation (§168(k))

Election to expense certain business assets (§179)

QLIP (§168(e)(6)), QRP (§168(e)(7)) & QRIP(§168(e)(8))

Congress enacted the provisions of §1250 & §1245

Investment Tax Credit - §48 (Repealed in 1986)

Inherently Permanent Test (

Whiteco

Industries, Inc. v. Commissioner)

HCA

Amerisouth

XXXII Ltd. v. Commissioner

Slide7

Chapter 3 – Cost segregation approaches

Detailed Engineering Approach from Actual Cost Records

Construction

Detailed Engineering Cost Estimate Approach

Acquisitions

Survey or Letter Approach

Alternate method for new construction

Residual Estimation Approach

Abbreviated approach by just pulling out the §1245 property

Sampling or Modeling Approach

Nearly identical buildings

“Rule of Thumb” Approach

“Industry Averages”

What approach is required by the IRS?

None, but some are more accurate than others

Slide8

Chapter 4 – elements of a quality study & Report

Elements of a Quality Cost Segregation Study

Preparation by an individual with expertise & experience

Detailed description of methodology

Use of appropriate documentation

Interviews conducted with appropriate parties

Use of a common nomenclature

Use of a common numbering system

Explanation of legal analysis

Determination of unit costs & engineering take-offs

Organization of assets into lists or groups

Reconciliation of total allocated costs to total actual costs

Explanation of the treatment of indirect costs

Identification & listing of § property

Consideration of related aspects

Slide9

Chapter 4 – elements of a quality study & Report

Elements of a Quality Cost Segregation Report

Summary letter/Executive summary

Narrative report

Schedule of assets

Schedule of direct & indirect costs

Schedule of property units & costs

Engineering procedures

Statement of assumptions & limiting conditions

Certificate

Exhibits

Are these elements required in a Cost

Seg

Study?

No, but a quality study & report will expedite the exam process.

Slide10

Chapter 5 – review & examination of a css

Steps to examining a study

Review for risk analysis purposes

Verify the cost basis & reconcile the depreciation to the tax return

Conduct initial risk analysis to evaluate audit potential

Examination

Review for examination purposes

Interview the preparer

Inspect the property

Review and verify the classes of property

Research the Tax Law

Cost Analysis

Summarize the findings & discuss the challenged assets with taxpayer

Prepare notice of proposed adjustments

Other considerations

Perform cost analysis; New construction or Acquired; Review sampling; Consider §263A; Consider change in Accounting Method (Form 3115)

Slide11

Chapter 6 – Special Topics

Chapter 6.1 – Uniform Capitalization

UNICAP – capitalize all direct costs & certain indirect costs allocable to real and tangible personal property produced by the taxpayer - §263A

Capitalization of Costs under §263A(a)

Indirect Costs

Capitalization of Interest under §263A(f)

Chapter 6.2 – Change in Accounting Method

PECO Food Case

Tangible Regulations §1.263(a)

Revenue Procedures involving Method Changes (Form 3115)

Non-automatic – Rev. Proc. 97-27, 1997-1 C.B. 680

Automatic – Rev. Proc. 2011-14, 2011-1 C.B. 330

Slide12

Chapter 6 – special topics

Chapter 6.3 – Depreciation Overview

MACRS

IRC §167 provides a depreciation allowance for wear & tear of property used in a trade or business or held for production of income

Since 1986, generally determined under §168 Modified Cost Recovery System

Two methods: General Depreciation System (GDS) & Alternative Depreciation System (ADS)

Depreciation Periods & Conventions

GDS has ten property classes based on recovery periods

3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25, 27.5, 39 or 50 years

Methods include: 200% declining balance; 150% declining balance; straight line

ADS must be used for the following property

Property used 50 percent or less for business

Tangible property used predominantly outside the US

Tax-exempt use property

Tax-exempt bond financed property

Certain other finite categories of property that are not common

Slide13

Chapter 6 – special topics

Depreciation Periods & Conventions Cont.

Conventions

Half-year: applies to property other than residential rental property, nonresidential real property, & railroad grading and tunnel bores

Mid-month: applies to residential rental property, nonresidential real property, & railroad grading and tunnel bores

Mid-quarter: applies to property (other than residential rental, nonresidential real property & railroad grading and tunnel bores) if more than 40% of aggregate basis is placed in service during the last three months of the tax year

Recovery Periods

Rev. Proc. 87-56

Asset Classes 00.11 to 00.4 – consist specific assets used in all business activities

Asset Classes 01.1 to 80.0 – consist of assets used in specific business activities

Slide14

Chapter 6 – special topics

Chapter 6.4 – Relevant Court Cases

AmeriSouthXXXII

: 2012 – Site Prep; Site Electric; Special HVAC; Special Plumbing; Special Electrical; Millwork

PPL Corporation: 2010 – Street Lights

L.L. Bean, Inc: 1998 – Electrical System; Fire Protection System; Concrete Slab Floor

SuperValu

Inc: 1997 – Refrigeration System

HCA: 1997 – Vinyl Floor Covering; Patient Corridor Handrails; Carpeting; Acoustical Ceilings

Boddie

-Noelle Enterprises, Inc: 1996 – Kitchen HVAC; Plumbing to Equipment; Electrical to Equipment

La Petite Academy: 1995 – Fencing – Playground; Exterior Façade Lighting; Kitchen Grease Trap; Dumpster Enclosure

Morrison, Inc: 1990 – Kitchen Hand Sinks; Eliason Doors; Customer Line Screen; Kitchen Grease Trap

Slide15

Chapter 6 – special topics

Chapter 6.4 – Relevant Court Cases

Metro National Corp.: 1987 – Partitions; False Ceilings w/Lighting; Exterior Security Lighting; Cabinets & Hardware

Piggly Wiggly Southern, Inc.: 1986 – HVAC Units

Illinois Cereal Mills, Inc: 1986 – Electrical Distribution System

Shoney’s South, Inc.: 1984 – Chandeliers & Lanterns

A.C. Monk & Co: 1982 – Louvered Wall; Electrical Distribution System; High Bay Roof; Storage Sheds

Scott Paper Co.: 1980 – Electrical Distribution System

Whiteco

Industries, Inc.: 1975 – Outdoor Signs (Billboards)

Slide16

Chapter 6 – special topics

Chapter 6.5 – Inherently Permanent

Inherently Permanent under §168 –

Whiteco

Inherently Permanent under §263A – UNICAP

Chapter 6.6 – Construction Process

Cost Segregation Studies are typically completed using information developed for the construction process

Concept

Contracts & Bid Documents

Bidding

Construction Field Work

Construction Payments

Completion

Slide17

Chapter 6 – special topics

Chapter 6.7 – Information Document Requests

Appropriate documentation is needed to support the conclusions in a cost segregation study

Participants & respective roles

Specific properties subject to the study

Property blueprints & drawings

Obtain a copy of the CSS

Secure computations

Ask specific questions regarding segregated property

Request for specific items & amounts in question

Chapter 6.8 – Bonus Depreciation Considerations

Eligible Property

Qualified Leasehold Improvement Property

Acquisition Requirements & Placed in Service Dates

Method of Accounting Issues related to Bonus Depreciation

Election out of Bonus

Slide18

Chapter 7 – Industry specific guidance

Chapter 7.1 – Casinos

Multiple Asset Classes for property

Recreation: Asset Class 79.0

Distributive Trades & Services: Asset Class 57.0

Electrical:

Main Office Areas; “Back of House”; Hotel Rooms: §1250 - 39-years

Specifically associated w/equipment in Casino area: §1245 - 7-years (79.0)

Specifically associated w/equipment not in Casino/Theater: §1245 - 5-years (57.0)

Chapter 7.2 – Restaurants

Mainly uses Asset Class 57.0

Décor Accessories: §1245 - 5-years

Non-Structural Theme Elements: §1245 - 5-years

Restaurant Furniture: §1245 - 5-years (other than office furniture); 7-years (office furniture) (00.11 – Office FF&E)

Slide19

Chapter 7 – Industry specific guidance

Chapter 7.3 – Retail Industries

Mainly uses Asset Class 57.0

Kiosks: §1245 - 5-years

Parking Structures: §1250 – 39-years

Security Systems: §1250 – 39-years (General Building Security); §1245 – 5-years (Primary purpose to minimize loss due to theft)

Chapter 7.4 – Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology

Recovery period is going to depend on use of the property

Activity Classes 01.1 to 80.0 or “Certain Property for which Recovery Periods Assigned”

Land Improvements

Some activity classes include Land Improvements which could change §1245 recovery

Many assets are Personal Property with no Class Life

Default to 7-year recovery period

Slide20

Chapter 7 – Industry specific guidance

Chapter 7.5 – Auto Dealership Industry

Primarily Asset Class 57.0 (5-year §1245)

Bollards & Guardrails: §1250, Land Improvements, or §1245

Floor Pits & Trenches: §1250 – 39-years

Equipment: §1245 – 5-years

Security Systems: §1250 or §1245

Chapter 7.6 – Auto Manufacturing

Asset Class 37.11 – Manufacture of Motor Vehicles (7-year §1245)

Catwalks & Mezzanines: §1250 (building); §1245 (7-years) – only provide access to process machinery or equipment

Electrical Distribution

Gate House: §1250 – 39-years

Guard Shack/Booth: §1245 – 7-years

Loading Dock: §1250 – 39-years

Slide21

Chapter 8.1 – electrical distribution systems

Definitions & Illustration

Connected Load: actual power required by a specific circuit to operate end-use equipment

Demand Load: factored load of entire electrical system design

Functional Allocation Approach: how a building’s EDS is allocated proportionally by demand load (Scott Paper v. Commissioner, 74 T.C. 137

Primary EDS: electrical equipment that receives power from outside the building to the MDPs

Secondary EDS: equipment that takes power from MDPs to panels

Branch Circuits: connections between panels and end-use device

Legal

Backround

Scott Paper: allowed allocation based on design “load”

A.C. Monk: rejected the functional allocation approach (more general uses)

Boddie-Noell: no portion of EDS is allocable to §1245

Illinois Cereal Mills: affirmed the functional allocation approach

Slide22

Chapter 8.1 – electrical distribution systems

Functional Allocation – Illustration

Step 1: determine whether the components of the EDS are inherently permanent structures

Step 2: determine if the EDS serves the operation & maintenance of a building or provides power to tangible personal property

Step 3: allocate the costs proportionally based on electrical demand load of various items served

Must analyze the buildings electrical design plans

Step 4: total the electrical demand load & determine the allocation of the EDS

Slide23

Chapter 8.2 – stand-alone open-air parking structures

Description of Stand-alone open-air parking structures

Parties’ Positions

Taxpayers: if not connected to the building treated as land improvements; if connected to the building agree that they have 39-year recovery period

IRS: fall within the definition of a building as they satisfy the appearance test

Function Test – requires structure to provide shelter or housing, provide working, office, parking, display, or sales space

Appearance Test: requires structure enclosing a space within its walls and usually covered by a roof

Penalty

20% accuracy-related penalty that applies to any substantial understatement of income tax

20% accuracy-related penalty that applies to the portion of any underpayment of tax attributable to negligence or disregard of rules or regulations

Slide24

Outdated Items

Bonus Depreciation

Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017

100% bonus

Acquired properties now eligible

Qualified Improvement Property

Need technical correction to 15-year

Qualified Leasehold Improvements

Qualified Restaurant Property

Qualified Retail Improvements

Slide25

ASCSP & the atg

Minimum Quality Standards Manual (MQS)

Developed by the ASCSP Technical Standards Committee

For use within ASCSP Membership

Modeled after the ATG

Outlines the principal elements of a cost segregation report

Outlines the engineering approaches

Lists key Revenue Procedures

Lists relevant case law & revenue rulings

Additional requirements to stamp or sign report with ASCSP designation

Slide26

QUESTIONS?

Slide27

THANK YOU

Travis Mlodzik, CCSP

Senior Manager, National Tax Office

tmlodzik@eidebailly.com

612.253.6627