Learning Objectives To examine the advantages and disadvantages of codified constitutions To debate whether the UK should adopt a written constitution Traffic Light Question Challenge Define a A codified constitution ID: 626619
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Codified & Uncodified" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Codified & UncodifiedSlide2
Learning ObjectivesTo examine the advantages and disadvantages of codified constitutionsTo debate whether the UK should adopt a written constitutionSlide3
Traffic Light Question ChallengeDefine;a) A codified constitutionb) An uncodified constitution
Give an example of;a) A codified constitution (not USA)b) An uncodified constitution (not UK)How many countries in the world have a codified constitution?
PRAISE SLIPMERITSlide4
Codified ConstitutionDEFINITIONA codified constitution is a constitution in which key constitutional provisions are collected within a single document, it is commonly known as a written constitution.EXAMPLES
Afghanistan, Australia, France, Germany, India, Ireland, North Korea, Russia, South Africa, USA, VietnamUncodified ConstitutionDEFINITIONAn uncodified constitution is a constitution that is made up of rules that are found in a variety of sources, in the absence of a single legal document or written constitution.
EXAMPLESIsrael, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia, UK, Canada, San MarinoSlide5
Codified and Uncodified Constitutions
Authoritative
The constitution is a ‘higher law’. The constitution binds all political institutions, including those that make ordinary law.EntrenchedThis means that it is difficult to amend or abolish. JudiciableBecause the constitution is a ‘higher law’, the judiciary can declare whether a law or action is constitutional or unconstitutional.
Codified ConstitutionsSlide6
Codified and Uncodified Constitutions
Not authoritative
Constitutional laws enjoy the same status as ordinary laws.Not entrenchedThe constitutions can be changed through the normal processes for enacting statue law.Not JudiciableIn the absence of a higher law, judges do not have a legal standard against which they can declare things constitutional or unconstitutional.
Uncodified ConstitutionsSlide7
Advantages and Disadvantages
Read p208-210
Make a list of
Advantages
and
Disadvantages
of a Codified Constitution and an Uncodified Constitution
Codified Constitution
Uncodified ConstitutionSlide8
Codified Constitution
Advantages
Clear Rules
Limited Government
Neutral interpretation
Protecting rights
Education and citizenship
Disadvantages
Rigidity
Judicial tyranny
Legalistic
Political bias
UnnecessarySlide9
Let’s DebateTHE MOTION: This House would adopt a written constitution for the UK.
(British Parliamentary Style Debating)
PROPOSITIONOPPOSITION1st Speaker2nd
Speaker3rd Speaker4th Speaker
30 seconds – 1 minute – 30 seconds = 2 minutes totalSlide10
YES! The UK should adopt a written constitution.
Nowhere can easily be seen as from so many sources.Would remove uncertainty about specific roles e.g. of the monarch.Some say it is outdated, inefficient and undemocratic with most conventions dating back to a pre-modern era. The House of Lords reflects a pre-democratic era with the idea of hereditary power.Tendency for executive dominance (power of executive). E.g. Blair removed session of question time, changed electoral system and composition of Lords. A constitution would constrain their power.No separation of powers – executive exercises great control over legislative process and local/subnational government.
Would protect the independence of the judiciary.Would provide up-to-date statement of rights of people which is more relevant that European Convention.Key laws would be entrenched (i.e firmly established and difficult to amend)Would be easier for the courts to interpret what is lawful behaviour and uphold the constitution. At the moment judicial review is limited as no definitive criteria for determining what is unconstitutional.
Would set out clearer values and structure of the political system.Would prevent any constitutional crises (e.g. over hung parliament in 2010 where no single part had an overall majority).Slide11
NO! The UK should not adopt a written constitution.
Traditional constitution known as the ‘Westminster model’ – claims this is how it is supposed to operate.System has worked well for several hundred years and has provided liberty and stability. Reflects the history and enduring values of the British peopleProvides for strong and effective government. Includes doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty with power centralised in cabinet.There is no widespread demand for or interest in change.Flexibility allows adjustments to meet new demands when required i.e. ‘new wine in old bottles’.
Peoples rights have been protected and a written constitution does not guarantee these rights (e.g. in US, Zimbabwe and Russia).Would be hard to devise a constitution which pleases everyone.Slide12
HomeworkReading and Note Taking, Heywood, p191-195Principles of the constitutionConsolidating your understandingShould the UK adopt a codified
constitution?Flexible or rigid constitution?Further ReadingA codified constitution for Britain (Vernon Bogadnor – Politics Review)