Policy amp REQUIREMENTS FOR CubeSats Dr Cassie Conley James E Johnson January 8 2015 Planetary Protection Basics Basic w orking definition Mitigating the risks associated with microbial and organic crosscontamination ID: 216353
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Planetary Protection Guidelines" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Planetary Protection GuidelinesPolicy & REQUIREMENTS FOR CubeSats
Dr. Cassie Conley, James E. Johnson,
January 8, 2015Slide2
Planetary Protection Basics
Basic working definition - Mitigating the risks associated with microbial and organic cross-contamination,
including:
Preservation of
planetary conditions for future biological and organic constituent explorationConsidered ‘forward contamination’Protecting Earth and its biosphere from potential extraterrestrial sources of contaminationConsidered ‘backward contamination’Human-Assisted Sample Return includes another element:Protecting human crews from exposure to unknown life forms that may be hazardous
2Slide3
Ocean Vent Communities:
110-360oC (230-660oF) water
1000s of meters depth
Sulfur-oxidizing Bacteria
No light input from the surface
Nobody thought worms could live at the bottom of the ocean!
Europa, too?
Life & Water…
3
Bacteria in ice,
but...Slide4
Low temperature environments
Deep subsurface
-10 °C
Life is Everywhere…
4
Up to 10
7
cells/g in 60m depth, with metabolic activity down to -20°C
Cryptoendoliths
Desulforudis
audaxviatorSlide5
…And life is on us…
Up to 10 000 microbes on 1 cm² of skinUp to 100 microbes on 1
mm²
of skin
Can
Earth life grow
on Mars?
Microbes on cheese also grow
in Mars chambers on Earth...
5Slide6
Planetary Protection: Over 50 Years of International Effort
1956, Rome: International Astronautical Federation meets to discuss lunar and planetary contamination
Feb
. 1958: International Council for Science (ICSU) forms committee on Contamination by
ExtraTerrestrial Exploration (CETEX)June 1958: NAS establishes the SSBJuly 1958: Formation of NASAJuly 1958: Formation of UN-COPUOSOct. 1958: Formation of COSPAR by ICSU1959-1962: Publication of guidelines: US, USSR, COSPAR1963
: NASA acquires the first ‘Planetary Quarantine Officer’ – on loan from the Public Health Service
6Slide7
International Framework for Planetary Protection
Planetary protection is an international commitment that is rooted in the United Nations Outer Space Treaty of 1967Treaty ratified by 102 countries (US ratified April 1967)
Article IX, UN Outer Space Treaty
“...parties to the Treaty shall pursue studies of outer space including the Moon and other celestial bodies, and conduct exploration of them so as to avoid their harmful contamination and also adverse changes in the environment of the Earth resulting from the introduction of extraterrestrial matter and, where necessary, shall adopt appropriate measures for this purpose...”COSPAR (Committee on Space Research) policy maintains and promulgates the internationally accepted approach to planetary protection on behalf of Article IX NASA planetary protection requirements are founded upon COSPAR policy
Planetary
Protection FACTS:
Policy applies to both robotic and human missions beyond Earth orbit
Policy revised over time to reflect latest understanding about life and
about solar
system bodiesPolicy applies to Government and non-governmental entities alike
The Moon and most Solar System Objects have no significant operational restrictions
7
Minimize unintended consequences of human exploration...Slide8
NASA’s Implementation of Planetary Protection PolicyNASA’s commitment to Planetary Protection:
Biological Contamination Control for Outbound and Inbound Planetary Spacecraft (NASA Policy Directive: NPD 8020.7G)
Robotic implementation:
Planetary Protection Provisions for Robotic Extraterrestrial Missions
(NASA Procedural Requirements: NPR 8020.12D)Historical implementation from Rangers to Mars Science LaboratoryHuman implementation:Conducted under the Apollo program as “Planetary Quarantine”NASA Policy Instruction (NPI 8020.7) intends to show the path towards requirements for human missions and is in place as of 2014NASA requirements currently being developed…Human-assisted Sample
Return:
Falls
under current robotic implementation measures, with consideration of drafted human mission guidelines where applicable
8Slide9
Planetary Protection Mission Constraints & Categorization
Depend on the nature of the mission
and
on the target planet
Assignment of categories for each specific mission/body is to take into account current scientific knowledge based on recommendations from scientific advisory groups
Examples of specific measures include:
Documentation of spacecraft trajectories, disposal, and spacecraft material inventory
Spacecraft organic archiving and restrictions
Constraints on spacecraft operating procedures
Reduction of spacecraft biological contamination
Restrictions on the handling of returned samples
W. Peet, 1967
9Slide10
Planetary Protection Mission Categories
PLANET MISSION MISSION
PRIORITIES TYPE CATEGORY
A Not of direct interest for understanding the Any I
process of chemical evolution. No protection of such planets is warranted.
B
Of significant interest relative to the process of Any II
chemical evolution, but only a remote chance
that contamination by spacecraft could jeopardize
future exploration. Documentation is required.
C
Of significant interest relative to the process of Flyby, Orbiter III
chemical evolution and/or the origin of life or for
which scientific opinion provides a significant
chance of contamination which could Lander, Probe IV
jeopardize future biological experiments.
Substantial documentation and mitigation is required.
All Any Solar System Body Earth-Return
V
“
restricted
”
or
“
unrestricted
”
10Slide11
Implementing Planetary ProtectionAll missions to Priority
B or C objects require documentation of mission trajectory and disposition of hardwareAll missions must ensure protection of Priority C solar system objects (Mars,
Europa
,
Enceladus, etc.)Reduce risk by considering potential constraints from the earliest stages of mission and hardware designPlanetary protection is a US treaty obligation, and cannot be waived...11Slide12
Overview of Categorization for Robotic and Human Missions
The planetary protection categorization dictates what requirements applyMission categorization is assigned by NASA’s Planetary Protection Officer (PPO) in consultation with
the Planetary Protection Subcommittee of the NAC to ensure requirements comply with policy and are sensibly
based upon the latest scientific knowledge
and use of evaluative and mitigating technologiesFor human and sample return missions – best to keep dialog and collaboration frequent!TENTATIVE CATEGORIES:12
Moon - Category II/V
In a nutshell, this means:
Documentation
Unrestricted
sample return
NEOs &
Phobos
/
Deimos
- Category II/
V
(MOSTLY)
In a nutshell, this means:
For NEOs – classification
depends
upon target NEO
For
Phobos
/
Deimos
– ESA/NASA study underway
Dialog with PPO
!
Mar/
sEuropa/Enceladus
- Category IV/V
In a nutshell, this means:
Documentation
Extensive
PP planning & implementation
Restricted
sample returnSlide13
Category I or II outbound, Category V Unrestricted Return
Genesis
Solar Wind Sample Return
• Returned Sep 8, 2004
Libration point trajectory
Launch July 2001
Flight system-deployedSlide14
Science class should not end in tragedy....
Science class should not end in tragedy....
Science class should not end in tragedy....
Science class should not end in tragedy....
Science class should not
The Basic Rationale for
Planetary Protection Precautions
(as written by Bart Simpson, Dec. 17, 2000, “Skinner’s Sense of Snow”)Slide15
Back-up/ReferenceSlide16
16