PPT-The argument from design: God

Author : liane-varnes | Published Date : 2018-03-16

Michael Lacewing enquiriesalevelphilosophycouk c Michael Lacewing Life Isnt life amazing Organs serve a purpose heart pump blood eye seeing We understand parts

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The argument from design: God" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

The argument from design: God: Transcript


Michael Lacewing enquiriesalevelphilosophycouk c Michael Lacewing Life Isnt life amazing Organs serve a purpose heart pump blood eye seeing We understand parts of an organ in relation to serving this purpose. PHIL/RS 335. A More Recent Addition. The Design Argument is a relatively recent contribution to the philosophical/theological attempt to prove God exists.. Though there are some suggestions of it in Aquinas (5. Kevin Rogers. Arthur Schopenhauer (1788 – 1860). German Philosopher. View of OA:. Sleight of hand trick. Charming joke. Bertrand Russell (1872 – 1970). “It is much easier to be persuaded that ontological arguments are no good than it is to say exactly what is wrong with them”. A Questions. AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding – one side. . Explain in lots of detail. 20 mins. Approx 2 sides. Link back to the question. Make links between your paragraphs – don’t produce a list.. Phil/RS 335. Why be good?. Like the design argument, the moral argument for . God. '. s . existence seems more directly rooted in our everyday experience than the more abstract considerations which generate the ontological and cosmological arguments.. Questions for next week. 1. Read Deuteronomy 30:15-19 and rewrite . Moses’s. statement as a logical argument. . Questions for next week. 2. What logical fallacy does Jesus refer to in Matthew 11:19? . AS. Background to the Argument. A classical theistic proof for the existence of God. Supports the concept of the God of classical theism (. omni. -words). Accepts that the cosmos is contingent upon a prior being to bring it into existence. What is the Cosmological argument?. Cosmological: Referring to the origin and structure of the universe.. The cosmological argument tries to prove that there is a perfect and well ordered universe, and a world in which we live (cosmos), rather than nothingness, because God brought the cosmos into existence. Theists argue that the universe is perfect because it was created by God and is not the result of random chance (the big bang theory).. Argument in its best academic, scholarly, or journalistic sense is not the same as an emotional argument or conflict between people. In general, it seeks to open a subject, not close it; to broaden a subject, not narrow it; and primarily to earn respect for a position, not necessarily defeat one.. If that’s so, what is the argument here?. Every argument starts with a question.. So – what questions does this text inspire? . SOAPS is one way to start thinking about how to argue.. S = What is the subject?. Michael Lacewing. enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk. Descartes’ question. Cosmological arguments usually ask ‘why does anything exist’?. Descartes doubts the existence of everything, and offers his cosmological argument after showing only that he . Cosmological Criticisms. Hume. 1711-1776. Empiricist. All knowledge comes from the senses. Imagination makes a connection between cause and effect. We think we know more about the world . than we really do. ADAPTATION=. Adaptations. = the unique features of an organism which are specializations for their environment &. their way of life. . How Do Organisms Adapt?. AP Language & Composition. The Language of Composition. The Heroes of 2001 Stamp depicts a photograph taken at Ground Zero after the September 11. th. terrorist attacks on the Twin Towers in New York City. Analyze the photograph’s argument, and explain why it IS or IS NOT an effective choice for a stamp for the U.S Postal Service. Why Argue?. Argument is not in itself an end or a purpose of communication. It is rather a means of discourse, a way of developing what we have to say. We can identify four primary aims or purposes that argument helps us accomplish:.

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"The argument from design: God"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents