and Law No 194 of 22 May 1978 How the italian law regulated the voluntary termination of pregnancy Virginia Matteucci ITALIAN LAW SINCE 1975 BOOK II TITLE X of italian ID: 605572
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "ABORTION IN ITALY" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
ABORTION IN ITALY and Law No. 194 of 22 May 1978
How the italian law regulated the voluntary termination of pregnancy
Virginia MatteucciSlide2
ITALIAN LAW SINCE 1975BOOK
II TITLE X of italian penal code punished CRIMES AGAINST THE INTEGRITY AND HEALTH OF THE RACEIn particular, the article 546 PROHIBITED ALL ABORTIONSSlide3
ARTICLE 546 pcWhoever
provides, with her consent - a woman's abortion, will be punished with reclusion from 2 to 5
years
.
Same
punishment
will
be
applied
to the woman
w
ho
gave
consent
to the
abortion
.Slide4
The only case where
abortion wasn't punishable
ARTICLE 54 pc:
STATE OF NECESSITY
ABORTION
IS POSSIBLE ONLY IF THERE IS
A
CURRENT
and
IMMINENT
DANGER
MEDICALLY
CERTIFIED
of a
SERIOUS
and
IRREPARABLE DAMAGE
for the womanSlide5
N.B. CURRENT
DANGER not potential, but a PRESENT, REAL and TANGIBLE danger SERIOUS
and
IRREPARABLE
DAMAGE
SERIOUS
or
PERMANENT
invalidity
or
incapacity
or A
REAL
THREAT
to the
mother’s
LIFESlide6
TURNING POINT FOR ABORTION IN ITALY
Decision of the Italian Constitutional Court (no. 27 of 18th february 1975) article 546
is
UNCONSTITUTIONALSlide7
WHY?Because
it prohibited all abortions, even if the woman had consented to it to
PROTECT HER PHYSICAL, MENTAL and SOCIAL WELL-BEING
because
of a
serious
danger
but
not
IMMINENT (so
without
the
conditions
to
apply
art 54 - state of
necessity
)Slide8
Constitutional judges said that this
article was in contrast with italian constitutional principlesArt
31
Cost
The Republic
protects
mothers
,
children
and the
young
by
adopting
necessary
provisions
.
Art
32
Cost
The
Republic
safeguards
health
as
a
fundamental
right of the
individual
.Slide9
MOST IMPORTANT PRINCIPLE STATEDBY CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
MOTHER’S HEALTH AND LIFE AND FOETUS’ HEALTH AND LIFE ARE NOT AT THE SAME LEVEL Slide10
WHY?Because
Mother’s health and life are real and actual
facts
.
Foetus
’ life
is
a
chance
more
than
a
fact
,
it’s
not
a concrete,
fulfilled
life
.Slide11
LAW 194/1978
In the wake of the judgment of the Constitutional Court, the Italian Parliament adopted Law No. 194 of 22 May 1978 on the
social
protection
of
motherhood
and the
voluntary
termination
of
pregnancy
.Slide12
The main principle behind this law is
the principle stated by Constitutional Court in 1975:Mother’s life and foetus’ life are compared: woman’s life and health are tangible and
real
facts
,
foetus
’ life
is
a
chance
.Slide13
“VOLUNTARY TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY”: HOW IS IT REGULATED?
Pregnancy and motherhood are considered in three different ways as a source of danger for mother’s health and life,
in relation with the
foetal
developement
:
PREGNANCY
DURING
THE FIRST 90
DAYS
PREGNANCY
AFTER
THE FIRST 90 DAYS
WHEN IT IS POSSIBILE THAT THE FOETUS
MAY BE VIABLE
(=
foetus
is
able
to
survive
outside
the
uterus
)Slide14
VTP DURING THE FIRST 90 DAYS (ART 4 L. 194/78)
In order to practice the VTP during the first 90 days, women whose situation
is
such
that
continuation
of the
pregnancy
,
childbirth
, or
motherhood
would
seriously
compromise
their
physical
or
mental
health
, in
view
of
their
state of
health
,
their
economic
, social, or family
circumstances
, the
circumstances
in
which
conception
occurred
, or the chance
that
the
child
would
be
born
with
abnormalities
or
malformations
,
shall
apply
to a public
counselling
centre or to a
fully
authorized
medicosocial
agency in the
region
, or to a
physician
of
her
choice
.Slide15
MAIN FEAUTURES OF THIS REGULATION:
It has to exist a SERIOUS DANGER FOR THE MOTHER’S PHYSICAL OR MENTAL HEALTH (Serious = reasonable, logical)It’s
not
necessary
that
this
serious
danger
is
related
with a SANITARY FACTOR.
This
danger
could
be
caused
also
by
ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, OR FAMILY CIRCUMSTANCES
.
OR
CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH CONCEPTION OCCURRED
(
violence
, rape,
incest
)
THE
CHANCE
THAT THE CHILD WOULD BE BORN WITH ABNORMALITIES OR MALFORMATIONS.
It’s
not
necessary
that
these
abnormalities
have
been
diagnosed
.
It
is
sufficient
that
there
is
a
reasonable
chance
that
the
foetus
is
going
to
have
some
abnormalities
of
malformations
. Slide16
Why this regulation
during the first 90 days?Foetus’ life is a chance BUT it’s
not
A CERTAIN FACT
.
During
the first 90
days
the
termination
of
pregnancy
isn’t
too
dangerous
for the
women
Physically
and
psychologically
less
traumaticSlide17
VTP AFTER THE FIRST 90 DAYS (ART 6 L 194/78)
Voluntary termination of pregnancy may be performed after the first 90 days:
when
the
pregnancy
or
childbirth
is
a
serious
threat
to the
woman’s
LIFE
when
the
pathological
processes
constitute
a
serious
threat
to the
woman's
physical
or
mental
health
,
such
as
those
associated
with
serious
abnormalities
or
malformations
of the
foetus
,
have
been
diagnosed
.Slide18
MAIN FEAUTURES OF THIS REGULATION:
The most important difference between this article and the 4th is that here physicists
have
to
DIAGNOSE
the
pathological
process
that
cause the
SERIOUS THREAT TO THE WOMAN’S
HEALTH
.
The
main
reason
of
this
legislative
provision
is
that
here
the
foetus
is
OLDER
, and the
pregnancy
is
more
likely
to
carry
successfully
to
term
.
The
abortion
is
more
dangerous
for the woman, and the
foetus
has
more
rights
then
in the case of
abortion
during
the first 90
days
.Slide19
VOLUNTARY TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY WHEN IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE FOETUS MAY BE VIABLE
When it is possible that the fetus may be viable, pregnancy may be
terminated
only
in the case
referred
to in item
a)
of
Article
6
, and the
physician
performing
the
termination
shall
take
any
appropriate
action
to
save
the life of the
foetus
.
So
it
is
possible
ONLY IF
the
pregnancy
or
childbirth
is
a
serious
threat
to the
woman’s
LIFE
Physicians
have
to take
any
appropriate
action
to
save
foetus
’ life.Slide20
AND WHAT ABOUT...?PERMISSIONS
The father does not need to give his authorisation for the termination.If the
pregnant
person
is
a
under 18
years
of
age
,
she
must
have
the
consent
of
either
parents
or
guardians
, or the
decision
can be
deferred
to a
judge
.Slide21
THE PROCESSOnce the decision is made to terminate a pregnancy, the
physician must issue a certificate of consent, sign it and ensure the pregnant woman signs it. Except for
urgent
cases
,
there
is
a
seven-day
period
of
reflection
before
the
termination
can be
carried
out.Slide22
THE CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION (art 9 L 194/78)
The possibility for any physician to refuse to performe abortions because of
religious
or
ethical
reasons
. Slide23
Art 9 of L.194/78
Health personnel shall not be required to assist in the procedures referred to pregnancy
terminations
if
they
have
a
conscientious
objection
,
declared
in
advance
.
The
objection
may
be
withdrawn
at
any
time
Conscientious
objection
shall
exempt
health
personnel
from
carrying
out
procedures
and
activities
specifically
and
necessarily
designed
to
carry
out the
termination
of
pregnancy
, and
SHALL NOT EXEMPT THEM
from
providing
care
BEFORE and AFTER the
termination
.
Conscientious
objection
may
not
be
invoked
by
health
personnel
if
their
personal
intervention
is
essential
in
order
to
save
the life of a woman in
imminent
danger
.Slide24
IS THE ITALIAN LAW FLAWLESS?
On paper, Italy’s law on abortion seems flawless – but reality is much different.
The
most
obvious
loophole
is
that
of
conscientious
objection
.
As
a
result
,
while
Law 194
grants
women
the right to a
safe
abortion
,
doctors
are
also
allowed
to
refuse
performing
it
.Slide25
In
several italian regions, conscientious
objectors
are
80 – 85%
of the
medical
personnel
qualified
to
perform
abortions
.Slide26
Council of Europe raps Italy over difficulty in
obtaining abortionsThe Council of Europe started to analyse the italian case from a complaint done by
the CGIL,
Italy's
biggest
trade
union
,
which
said
that
the high
number
of
conscientious
objectors
has
made
abortion
extremely
difficult
for some
women
who
want
to
get
access
to the procedure
.
Women
seeking
an
abortion
are
sometimes
forced
to go
elsewhere
in
Italy
or
abroad
, or bypass the
authorities
to
get
a
termination
.
The
Council
said
that
“
t
hese
situations
may
involve
considerable
risks
for the
health
and
well-being
of the
women
concerned
,
which
is
contrary
to the right to the
protection
of
health
”Slide27
Silvana Agatone, a 62-year-old gynecologist in Rome and the founder
of L.A.I.G.A, an italian organization that provides information on how and where to get an
abortion
40% of the
italian
public hospitals
DON’T PRACTISE
TERMINATIONS OF PREGNANCY,
because
they
don’t
have
non-
objectors
doctors
working
there
.
In
most
cases
, non-
objectors
doctors
are
working
in a negative cultural
climate
A case in Campania:
after
a first
termination
of
pregnancy
a nurse
refused
to
clean
and
sterilize
medical
instruments
to
block
other
abortion
surgeries
.
Objection’s
abuse
that
become
a
real
boycottSlide28
What solutions?
Minister of Health just collect data about the number of abortions Italy
should
make
some
studies
about
the
real
abortions
’
demand
to
see
if
it
is
satisfied
or
not
.
Italy
have
to
save
some
places
for non-
objector
doctors
to be
sure
to
have
medical
personnel
qualified
to
perform
abortions
in
each
public hospital.