PPT-Causal Comparative Research Design

Assoc Prof Dr Şehnaz Şahinkarakaş Introduction to CausalComparative Research A causalcomparative study is a study in which the researcher attempts to determine the cause or reason for preexisting differences in groups of . Jean-Philippe Pellet. Andre . Ellisseeff. Presented by Na Dai. Motivation. Why structure . l. earning?. What are Markov blankets?. Relationship between feature selection and Markov blankets?. Previous work. Reversible Debugging. Ivan . Lanese. Focus research group. Computer Science . and Engineering Department. Univers. ity . of Bologna/INRIA. Bologna, Italy. Joint work with Elena Giachino (FOCUS) and Claudio Antares Mezzina (FBK Trento). Does Bell’s theorem prevent the use of causal explanations in quantum mechanics?. Part I:. Locality, Bell’s version of locality, and its discontents. The greatest mystery in science?. Locality. = “things do not go faster than . Michael Rosenblum. March 16, 2010. Overview. I describe the set of assumptions encoded by a causal directed acyclic graph (DAG). I use an example from page 15 of the book . Causality. by Judea Pearl (2009). . : A Ground-Breaking use of Directed Acyclic Graphs. Bob Stoddard SEMA. Mike Konrad. SEMA. Copyright 2015 Carnegie Mellon University. This . material is based upon work funded and supported by the Department of Defense under Contract No. FA8721-05-C-0003 with Carnegie Mellon University for the operation of the Software Engineering Institute, a federally funded research and development center.. Susan Athey, Stanford GSB. Based on joint work with Guido Imbens, Stefan Wager. References outside CS literature. Imbens and Rubin Causal Inference book (2015): synthesis of literature prior to big data/ML. Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna &. Institute . for Quantum Optics . and Quantum Information, Vienna . Mateus . Araujo. , . Cyril . Branciard, Fabio Costa, Adrian Feix. , Christina . Giarmatzi, Ognyan Oreshkov, Magdalena Zych. theory . Sri Hermawati. The focus of this chapter is on the role of causal processes in decision making.. Newcombs . problem/. the predictors paradox. You are offered a choice between two boxes, B1 and B2. Box . Causes are . difference-makers. .. Effect need not be . universal/deterministic. .. N. ot . everyone who is bitten by a cobra . dies. .. N. ot . everyone who dies is bitten by a . cobra. .. B. ut . cobra bites still cause . The . Post Hoc . Fallacy . – this is sometimes called the . post hoc ergo propter hoc. fallacy. The full phrase means: “after this, therefore because of this” And it is a causal inference fallacy. (304). Tony Cox. May 5, 2016. 1. Download free CAT software from: . http://cox-associates.com/CAT.htm. . Outline. Why CAT? Challenges for causal analytics. Ambiguous C-R associations: theory & practice. Distributed Systems. Lecture 14. Michael Freedman. 2. Linearizability. Eventual. Consistency models. Sequential. Causal. Lamport. clocks: C(a) < C(z) Conclusion: . None. Vector clocks: V(a) < V(z) Conclusion: . Causal arguments are inductive arguments in which the conclusion is a claim that one thing causes another.. For example:. Clogged arteries cause heart attacks. A rough surface produces friction. Exercise during heat causes sweating. Adeetya's Kitchen & Furniture in Pune offers exquisite handmade furniture designs with superior craftsmanship and modern, stylish appeal. https://adeetyas.com/factory-made-furniture-design-in-pune.php