/
Governance Trusteeship Governance Trusteeship

Governance Trusteeship - PowerPoint Presentation

lindy-dunigan
lindy-dunigan . @lindy-dunigan
Follow
406 views
Uploaded On 2016-07-31

Governance Trusteeship - PPT Presentation

Leadership Essential Roles for a Great University Workshop Presentation for Lincoln University Board of Trustees March 23 2012 President Patricia McGuire Trinity Washington University Governance ID: 427277

institution board university governance board institution governance university institutional trustees president faculty business governing members body policy interest roles

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Governance Trusteeship" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Governance TrusteeshipLeadershipEssential Roles for a Great University

Workshop Presentation for

Lincoln University Board of Trustees

March 23, 2012

President Patricia McGuire

Trinity Washington UniversitySlide2

GovernanceIn universities, governance is a system for decision-making that recognizes authority, responsibility and accountability among multiple constituencies, including the Board of Trustees, the President and senior executives, the Faculty, the Staff, the Student Body, the Alumnae and Alumni, and in various ways, depending upon the institutional identity, the state or local government officials, or a religious congregation or local ecclesiastical authority, or such other constituencies as may stake a claim on decisions affecting the institution.

Because higher education values inclusive collegiality, we often call the sharing of decision-making authority “shared” governance.

Legal authority is a factor determining the governance structure, but legal authority is not governance itself. Law establishes the framework, but governance describes the system.

2Slide3

TrusteeshipTrusteeship is the responsibility held collectively by that group of individuals who constitute the board of directors (or trustees) to steward the assets of the university effectively; to ensure effective university leadership; to establish the overall mission and strategic goals; to ensure effective policies that reflect compliance with all relevant laws , regulations and accreditation standards; to hold the president and faculty accountable for oversight of the quality and effectiveness of the academic programs; to ensure that adequate plans, personnel and resources are in place to maintain the safety and security of all people on campus.

Trusteeship can only be exercised by the group known as the board; no individual exercises trusteeship alone.

3Slide4

LeadershipLeadership in the university is exercised across multiple roles for many different purposes. The University President is the most visible leader, charged with the responsibility to articulate the vision, steward the mission, organize and direct the talent, use resources wisely and effectively, ensure institutional integrity, enlarge and extend the institutional reputation, while also raising capital, maintaining buildings and grounds, ensuring state-of-the-art technology, keeping the students under control, the faculty relatively content, and the alumni very happy particularly during March Madness.

Provosts, deans, faculty, other executives, staff and students also exercise important leadership roles in their zones of influence.

Trustees also provide significant examples of leadership in their collective action as well as in their personal generosity and attentiveness to the needs of the institution and its personnel.

4Slide5

Wisdom“Management is the capacity to handle multiple problems, neutralize various constituencies, motivate personnel; in a college or university, it means hitting as well the actual budget at break-even. Leadership, on the other hand, is an essentially moral act, not --- as in most management --- an essentially protective act. It is the assertion of a vision, not simply the exercise of a style: the moral courage to assert a vision of the institution in the future and the intellectual energy to persuade the community or the culture of the wisdom and validity of the vision. It is to make the vision practicable, and compelling.”

A. Bartlett

Giamatti

, president of Yale University 1978-1986, in A Free and Ordered Space: The Real World of the University (New York: Norton, 1990)

5Slide6

Middle StatesCharacteristics of Excellence Standard 4

The

institution’s system of governance clearly defines the roles

of institutional constituencies in policy development and decision-making. The governance structure includes an active governing

body with sufficient autonomy to assure

institutional integrity

and to fulfill its responsibilities of policy and

resource

development

, consistent with the mission of the institution.

6Slide7

Middle States Guidance – “Context”

Institutional governance

provides the means through which authority and responsibility

are assigned, delegated, and shared in a climate of mutual support and respect. The Commission on Higher Education expects a climate of shared collegial governance in which all constituencies (such as faculty, administration,

staff, students

and governing board members, as determined by each institution

) involved

in carrying out the institution’s mission and goals participate in

the governance

function in a manner appropriate to that institution

.

Within any system of shared governance, each major constituency

must carry

out its separate but complementary roles and responsibilities. Each

must contribute

to an appropriate degree so that decision-makers and

goal-setters consider

information from all relevant constituencies. While

reflecting institutional mission, perspective, and culture, collegial governance structures should acknowledge also the need for timely decision-making.Whatever the title—board, directors, trustees, governors, or regents—the governing body is ultimately accountable for the academic quality, fiscal and academic integrity, academic planning, assets, and financial health of the institution. It should review institutional assessment results and participate in institutional planning. However, it should not manage, micro manage, or interfere in the day-to-day operation of the institution.In financial affairs, the members of the governing body should confine themselves, as they do in academic matters, to a basic policy-making role, ensuring strong financial management by holding the chief executive officer responsible and accountable for internal operation. Governing body members, regardless of how appointed, have primary responsibility to the accredited institution and should not allow political or other influences to interfere with governing body duties.Members of the governing body act with authority only as a collective entity. Governing body members of higher education institutions normally have no financial interest in the institution. In cases where financial interests may exist, such as remuneration of board members or contractual relationships, the members of the governing body should be able to demonstrate that those interests do not outweigh the greater duty to secure and ensure the academic and fiscal integrity of the institution.

7Slide8

American Council on Education

Conflict of Interest

Guidelines

At every higher education institution, conflicts of interest of trustees, faculty and staff should be addressed in written policy, whether in one policy or separate policies.The policies should require, at a

minimum:

disclosure

of known significant financial interests a faculty member, administrator or trustee has in outside organizations that do or seek to do business with, or may otherwise benefit financially from association with, the institution, where the individual has actual or apparent influence over an institutional decision that may affect the

organization;

review

of disclosures by one or more institutional officials;

and

procedures

to address identified conflicts

.

Trustees

, faculty, administrators and staff should be notified of the requirements of pertinent policy at least annually

.

One

or more persons at the institution should be available to answer questions about the policies.The institution should review and assess its policies and practices in this area from time to time.8Slide9

IssuesTypical governance

, trusteeship and leadership issues in higher education

today

:Establishing Policy v. Directing OperationsBoard MicromanagementBoard-President RelationshipTrustee Relationships with StaffInvestigating Complaints and

Grievances

Whistleblower Policy and Processes

Strategic

Planning Roles and Relationships

Personnel

Decisions

Conflict-of-Interest Policies and Practices

Succession Planning

9Slide10

Roles and Relationships

Board sets the overall mission and strategic plan and adopts policies consistent with those decisions

President and management team implement the plans and policies and make specific decisions for operations

Board may review the president’s annual operating plan but should avoid micro-management of the detailsA wise president keeps the board informed of progress, outlines top-level challenges, and creates an environment in which the board feels informed and consulted without feeling the need to interfere with operationsBoards hire the president; the president hires everyone else.

Boards may hire external advisors: legal counsel, auditors, but the president should be consulted in these decisions.

Board Chair must manage the board, maintain open communication and also ensure the discipline of board members who go outside of the boundaries of good board conduct.

10Slide11

When Good Governance Goes Bad:Roles and Relationships Chapter

Individual trustees encourage ‘back door’ conversations with faculty and staff about routine operational issues (trustees need to distinguish genuine whistleblowing --- and follow the rules for such reporting --- from inappropriate discussions)

Individual trustees fail to understand that they have no standing except when the board meets as a collective entity; there is no individual power of trusteeship

President and board chair do not collaborate to maintain an open, healthy environment of dialogue and communication with trustees

Board Chair loses control of the board, is unwilling or unable to manage meetings, refuses to address out-of-bounds behavioral issues of members

Board makes specific decisions directing curriculum and programs without faculty participation

Board members gossip about institutional and board business externally

Management complains openly about board members

Students become a secondary consideration to business discussions at board meetings

Board allows external

entitites

--- church, state, city, alumni, media --- to have undue influence in decisions that must be the board’s alone for the best interests of the university

11Slide12

Conflicts of Interest: Rules to Live By

Have a written conflict-of-interest policy, and be sure it works. Require annual disclosures in writing.

Review potential conflicts at least annually; assign this responsibility to a logical entity, e.g., Audit Committee, legal counsel

You are not on this board to generate business for your company or your friends; every decision you make as a trustee must be in the best interests of the university. Your “duty of loyalty” must be undivided when you sit as a trustee. Trying to steer business to the institution, suggesting that bid processes be waived, or otherwise suggesting abridgement of fair and open business processes violates the spirit and possibly the letter of the conflict of interest rules.

Alumni, public appointees, parents: See #3!

If you have a conflict, abstain from the discussion and vote on the matter at hand.

12Slide13

When Good Governance Goes Bad: Conflicts of Interest ChapterA trustee has a real estate “deal” that he insists the university president and CFO should explore with his partners --- how should the institution vet potential business opportunities to avoid conflicts while also not missing potentially good business relationships?

A partner in the trustee’s law firm wants her spouse to get a position as an adjunct faculty member in the Business Department, so the trustee calls the head of the department to ask the faculty chair to interview the spouse --- how can the potential employment relationship be managed to avoid conflicts?

A trustee sits on the board of the university’s bank and in that position learns confidential negative information about the business interests of another member of the board of trustees --- what should the trustee do?

The president is invited to join the board of a major foundation that also provides grants to the university --- is this a conflict? Who decides?

A major vendor invites board members to participate in the vendor’s annual golf outing all-expenses-paid --- should the trustees accept?

13Slide14

ResourcesAssociation of Governing Boards www.agb.org

Middle States

www.msche.org

American Council on Education www.acenet.edu

14