/
ITU-TQSDG – DUBAI  Methodologies and Tools for Auditing the Quality of Service ITU-TQSDG – DUBAI  Methodologies and Tools for Auditing the Quality of Service

ITU-TQSDG – DUBAI  Methodologies and Tools for Auditing the Quality of Service - PowerPoint Presentation

lindy-dunigan
lindy-dunigan . @lindy-dunigan
Follow
351 views
Uploaded On 2018-09-16

ITU-TQSDG – DUBAI  Methodologies and Tools for Auditing the Quality of Service - PPT Presentation

2 Agenda Technology changes Testing techniques Latest testing methodologies Sharing experience TOOLS AND METHODOLOGIES TOOLS AND METHODOLOGIES Faisal Ghazaleh ITUT QSDG Dubai November 2014 ID: 667154

itu 2014 dubai november 2014 itu november dubai qsdg ghazaleh faisal methodologies testing ftp tools data network experience test

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "ITU-TQSDG – DUBAI  Methodologies and ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

ITU-TQSDG – DUBAI Methodologies and Tools for Auditing the Quality of ServiceSlide2

2

Agenda

Technology changes

Testing techniques

Latest testing methodologies

Sharing experience

[

TOOLS AND METHODOLOGIES] Slide3

[

TOOLS AND METHODOLOGIES]

Faisal Ghazaleh

ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide4

[

TOOLS AND METHODOLOGIES]

Faisal Ghazaleh

ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide5

[

TOOLS AND METHODOLOGIES]

Faisal Ghazaleh

ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide6

Global Wearable Devices Traffic Impact

:51 Percent of Total Mobile Data Traffic Will Be 4G by 2018

Mobile Data Traffic and Offload Traffic, 2018

Data Hungry Application

D

istribution

Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast by Region

MESSAGE: DATA TRAFFIC EXPLOSION

[

TOOLS AND METHODOLOGIES]

Faisal Ghazaleh

ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide7

ANSWER

: UNDERSTAND THE IMPACT OF THE NEED TO FOCUS ON CUSTOMERS

Subscribers

focus on their perceived experience

with offered service (e.g. voice, mobile video, gaming

), and

operators need to cost efficiently manage and control complex 4G

networks

while coping with high traffic growth

The wireless operators’ problem at its core:

4G ecosystem deployments allow very high data

rate apps

efficiently delivered

to a broad range of

devices. This raises subscriber expectations for fixed-line-like service experience (where mobility is not an excuse). This is fundamentally driving the capacity (

QoS

) crunch inside the network. Therefore: operators face a continuous struggle to maintain high

QoE

with continual capacity constraints due to spectrum and cost limits.

Solution:

Customer experience centric network testing and monitoring, and network optimization process automation

Multi RAT

Multi core

IMS**

RCS*/

Mobile Cloud

*IP Multimedia

Subsystem

**Rich

Communication Suite

MESSAGE: User satisfaction vs. operators challenges

Faisal Ghazaleh

ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide8

[

TOOLS AND METHODOLOGIES]

Advance offerings and complicated networks

Kee

p the testing methodology s

imple

Faisal Ghazaleh

ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide9

[

TOOLS AND METHODOLOGIES]

Reproducing the

same environment

requires to test like a customer using same application on the same device in the geographical location of the customer.

Faisal Ghazaleh

ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide10

Moving closer to the

QoE

Moving to the cost efficiency

Moving to the could

Where the T&M is heading

Metrics

Licenses

[

TOOLS AND METHODOLOGIES]

Faisal Ghazaleh

ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide11

KQIs/KPIs consistency across the different operators.

Time to publish the results and make available online.

Accuracy of the results.

Frequency of the test and cost of the benchmarking/auditing.

Varity of the offered services like

VoLTE

, OTT,

VoHSPA

, and video-audio services RCS-e.

Regulator challenges

[

TOOLS AND METHODOLOGIES]

Faisal Ghazaleh

ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide12

SHARING EXPERIENCE: UNFIED SOLUTION and kpis/qkis Slide13

Global practicies by telecom regulators

[

TOOLS AND METHODOLOGIES]

PSTN

Faisal Ghazaleh

ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide14

Global practicies by telecom regulators

[

TOOLS AND METHODOLOGIES]

PSTN

Faisal Ghazaleh

ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide15

ANSWER: TEST THE NETWORKS LIKE A REAL CUSTOMER IS USING

IT: A CUSTOMER CENTRIC TESTING SOLUTION (ODM)

Laptop-based drive test solution

maintains

control and coordination through an On-Device Server

Server resides inside the terminal, managing the supported services (VoLTE, IP Logging, Call Control etc)

Repeatable “control scripts” supported across multiple devices (repeatable testing)

Enables testing of end user terminal QoS settings and IP stack characteristics

Provides framework for future services to be added easily and controlled by a single client (e.g. Blixt implementation)

UE

On-Device

Server

Service B

Call Control

Service A

VoLTE

Service M

IP Logging

TCP/IP (SIP, RTP, etc)

QoS setting per service

QoS

First to test

VoLTE-ViLTE

as a user

via on-device

VoLTE

client , test everything ON Device

MESSAGE: testing philosophy: to be highly

Innovative by designing measurement metrics

suited to the 4G/5G world: ODM solution

Faisal Ghazaleh

ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide16

Use collected device data to benchmark your network performance against competitors.

Benchmark network coverage against competitors to ensure

customers receive top-quality service indoor and outdoor.

BENCHMARK LIKE A USER

Quickly see subscriber experience issues

using handset score that aggregates dropped and

blocked calls, handover failure, downlink/uplink

throughput analyses.

Aggregate handset data analytics. Clearly display the best

and worst performing handsets using six key metrics.

Faisal

Ghazaleh ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide17

SHARING EXPERIENCE: customer agentsSlide18

Monitor a targeted group of end users based on the complains like a users in a certain location/with a certain mobile phone.

Regulators do not have access to the OSS data of the operators.

Interact with the end user right after the event.

Reaching the customer wherever they are across the country.

Regulator challenges

[

TOOLS AND METHODOLOGIES]

Faisal Ghazaleh

ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide19

Engineering targeting – visualized through heat-maps

19

Faisal

Ghazaleh ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014

Global practicies by telecom regulatorsSlide20

20

Indoor / Outdoor

Faisal

Ghazaleh ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide21

Single / Multi probe analysisTest drill down and replay

Cell info on map21

LIGHT drive testing

Faisal

Ghazaleh ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide22

Wide range of service testing in both interactive mode as well as a remote controlled probe

22

Handset functionality

Faisal

Ghazaleh ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide23

SHARING EXPERIENCE: innovatie new kqiSSlide24

Throughput values for DL ABM correlate extremely well to FTP

For ABM, DL and UL throughput and delay are obtained simultaneously

BLIXT™ ABM COMPARED TO FTP (DL EXAMPLE)

FTP intrusiveness= 100%

ABM intrusiveness* = 5%

95%

less resources

LEGEND

Blixt actual PHY (low)

FTP actual PHY (high)

Blixt app layer throughput

FTP app layer throughput

Blixt by Ascom © ASCOM 2014

24Slide25

ABM Accuracy AND LEVEL OF INTRUSIVENESS

Blixt by Ascom © ASCOM 2014

Measurements done in a perfect radio environment

Effective

zone

of ABM

Less

suitable

The accuracy displayed in the table on this slide is a comparison of

the

Blixt

™ result as compared to the

actual

available

bendwidth

in the network under test.

It is not a comparison with FTP!

FTP as a test method is likely to be significantly less accurate than

Blixt

™ under non-ideal conditions.

25Slide26

“Is it not better to use FTP since it is a standard application and better represents the user experience?”

Answer: FTP is clearly not an application commonly used by smartphone users. The objective of testing available bandwidth is to determine this characteristic of the network, and not how well FTP performs in the network on a specific device. This is essentially what the FTP legacy method measures.

“How do we know the results are accurate?”

Answer: Other customers have tested the technology and found it to be accurate, In reality, FTP is less likely to give an accurate result as it is more susceptible to be negatively affected by conditions of the test session not related to the available bandwidth.

“We are happy with our current test methodology, why would we change?”

Answer: With legacy technologies such as 3G, FTP and similar legacy methods may be perfectly adequate since the available bandwidth is modest.

With LTE bandwidth approaching or exceeding 100 Mbps, these legacy methods become at best highly impractical and at worst impossible to use, for a variety of reasons. Please see “

Speedtest

vs

Blixt

™” comparison.

Common Questions Answered

Blixt by Ascom © ASCOM 2014

26Slide27

CONCLUSIONS

PLEASE VISIT OUR WEBSITE:

http

://

www.ascom.com/nt/en/index-nt/about-us-network-testing/nt-about-us-resources.htm/

White papers:

VoLTE

, Video Streaming,

HetNets, Carrieir Aggregation and...watch the space:

eMBMS

testing to come soon

Informa

Webinar: Advanced testing with Ascom in LTE networks

Webinars:

VoLTE

Dr. Irina Cotanis ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide28

QUESTIONS ?Slide29

Thank you

Dr. Irina Cotanis ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014Slide30

CONCLUSIONS

A FULL 24/7

QoE

/QOS CYCLE SOLUTION FOR MOBILE NETWORK AND SERVICES DESIGNED TO MEET CUSTOMERS’ SATISFACTION

Automated data correlation

and presentati

on

Built-in best practices scripted data analytics provide automated root cause analysis

Providing network and customer experience -centric diagnoses for voice (

VoLTE

, OTT,

VoHSPA

), and video-audio services (OTT, RCS-e/

Joyn

)

My competitors’ customers (Benchmark)

My customers, real field agents

My Customer Experience Data

Automated “what,” “why” and engineer- trusted “how” scenarios

Dr. Irina Cotanis ITU-T QSDG, Dubai, November 2014