PPT-Land Use Exactions, Takings and Impact Fees

Peter M Friedman Holland amp Knight LLP 2017 Municipal Attorneys Spring Seminar Illinois Municipal League Friday March 31 2017 DoubleTree Hotel Bloomington Illinois Impact FeesExactions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I we have hereunto subscribed affixed my our its names and corporate seal by its proper officers this SIGNED by the above named in the presence of Transferor sign here Transferor sign here Witness sign here Consent of Spouse FOR New Supreme Court Guidance on Inverse Condemnation. Introduction. Inverse condemnation generally and overview of presentation.. The Oregon Supreme Court’s recent decisions in . Dunn . v. City of Milwaukie. S. eminar . on . Takings . and . Exactions. John D. Echeverria. Vermont Law School. February 26, 2014. Concord, N.H.. What’s a Taking?. “Nor shall . private property . be taken for public use, without just compensation.”. APA Minnesota State Planning Conference. St. Cloud, Minnesota. September 30, 2011. Jean Coleman, Attorney/Planner. CR Planning, Inc.. jcoleman@crplanning.com. Planners are good guys. Right?. We want the best for our community. John Echeverria. Vermont Law School. May 2011. Two Objectives. Explain the common sense foundation of the common sense “parcel as a whole” rule.. Provide three illustrations of the common sense application of the common sense “parcel as a whole” rule.. h. igher education. Anna . Vignoles. Institute for Education. Change. Impact . on . demand. Pricing. The . future shape of the sector. Impact on demand. Previous fee increases have not impacted on enrolment. 43d Select Conference on Industry Litigation. Damien M. Schiff. Pacific Legal Foundation. Physical taking (categorical). Third-party physical taking (categorical). Deprivation of all economically viable use (categorical). Damien M. Schiff. Pacific Legal Foundation. Takings Tests. Physical taking (categorical). Third-party physical taking (categorical). Deprivation of all economically viable use (categorical). Regulation has gone “too far”. John D. Echeverria. Vermont Law School. 2014 APA National . Planning Conference. April 28, 2014. Atlanta, Georgia. ". I'm still saying the state of Nevada owns that land, and the federal government has been an encroacher. I'm not moving my cattle. We have ... rights. SuperConference. Denominator Problems with . Penn Central . (1978) . and. Mayhew . (1998) . William . W. Wade, Ph. D. .. Energy and Water Economics. 931-490-0060. wade@energyandwatereconomics.com. February 11, 2013. and . Exactions. John D. Echeverria. Vermont Law School. February 26, 2014. Concord, N.H.. What’s a Taking?. “Nor shall . private property . be taken for public use, without just compensation.”. Kevin Burnett, Willdan Financial Services. Scott . McCarty, Town of Queen Creek . GFOAz . Summer Conference. August 9, 2018. Presentation Overview. Review Legislative . History. Town . of Queen Creek’s Story and Lessons Learned. B. Fairbanks . 7/24/2017 . Major Points for Today’s Class. Discussion of the concept of takings and eminent domain . Analyze . and discuss the assigned cases on these topics . Eminent domain. The power of a government to take private property for public use. . SuperConference. Denominator Problems with . Penn Central . (1978) . and. Mayhew . (1998) . William . W. Wade, Ph. D. .. Energy and Water Economics. 931-490-0060. wade@energyandwatereconomics.com. February 11, 2013.